Tag: Colorado

Alternative Headline: Colorado Medicaid Costs Surge, Major Cuts Loom Under Federal “BBB” Law

[MM Curator Summary]: Colorado faces rising Medicaid costs, a tight budget, and looming federal cuts under the “BBB” law that could exceed $2B annually by 2028.

====================================

As Colorado cheerfully expanded Medicaid following massive financial incentives created by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, legislators forgot the simple wisdom of the former chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisors, Herb Stein, “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.”

Our new report from the Common Sense Institute, “Colorado Health Policy at a Crossroads: Growth, Costs, and Consequences,” highlights how health care spending has become the single largest budget item in the Colorado state budget — approximately 20% of total general fund spending — and how 182 new health-care bills enacted since 2019 are costing the state more than $850 million a year (of which just over a third is covered by federal funding) in addition to costing the private sector more than $270 million annually in fees and lost TABOR refunds.

While Colorado’s share of the population that is enrolled in Medicaid is lower than the national average at about 20%, our spending per enrollee at $11,263 per year is about $400 higher than average.

At the end of the recent regular legislative session, the legislature’s Joint Budget Committee had to reduce next year’s state spending $1.2 billion to keep the roughly $17 billion budget balanced, with rising Medicaid costs being a key driver of the shortfall. The combination of disabled enrollees and those over 65 with full Medicaid benefits represent less than 10% of the Medicaid population but about 50% of the cost.

The legislature found a way to absorb the Medicaid-driven budget shortfall without cutting Medicaid but they will not be able to continue doing so. Difficult choices will need to be made.

And all of that is before the impact of The Big Beautiful Bill Act (“BBB”), which will significantly cut federal funding to states’ Medicaid programs while also increasing states’ Medicaid operating costs. These effects phase in beginning in 2028, so the legislature has a window to handle the inevitable massive budgetary crunch from these changes. Aspects of the BBB’s final impact remain uncertain but it’s likely that the final cost to the state — again, between lower federal revenues and higher operating costs — will exceed $1 billion a year and could exceed $2 billion a year.

There are four ways to address the exploding cost of Medicaid within the state budget: restrict Medicaid eligibility and remove people from the program; reduce the range of treatments that qualify for Medicaid reimbursement to providers; reduce the reimbursement rate, i.e., the amount that the program pays a doctor, nurse, or clinic to provide a particular service; cut spending on other items to absorb some of the increased cost of Medicaid.

The BBB’s work and work-reporting requirements will do some of the work in the first category but not nearly enough to offset other cost increases. As noted, 50% of the program’s cost comes from 10% of the Medicaid population; those who lose benefits due to work (or paperwork) requirements — younger able-bodied people — are not in that part of the population and will not reduce costs significantly. Politically, reducing costs among that 10% of the population will be challenging.

As our report notes, the massive list of health-care bills passed by the state legislature in the past six years reads like a wish-list for those who believe in government-run health care, with little apparent thought about cost. Obamacare essentially bribed states to expand Medicaid by offering a $9 match for every $1 of federal spending in the pool of expansion enrollees. If that number is reduced, especially alongside the BBB phased-in reduction of hospital provider fees which begins in three years, today’s Medicaid finance problems will seem like the good old days.

Legislators ignored Stein’s Law at their peril — and, for Colorado taxpayers, at ours.

https://www.coloradopolitics.com/opinion/colorado-ran-up-the-tab-on-medicaid-podium/article_7c7e9702-1bac-4e34-a5f8-976f9da89145.html

COLOR CODE: 

General item, but important. Gets at main point of article= YELLOW

Has a dollar amount or number = GREEN

A specific topic that seems to be different than other topics = BLUE

Alternative Headline: Medicaid Cuts Threaten CO Hospitals

[MM Curator Summary]: The proposed $600 million Medicaid cut in a Republican tax bill could shut down six rural Colorado hospitals and strain community health services statewide.

========================================

Six rural Colorado hospitals could close in the coming years if Congress adopts the more than $600 million in Medicaid cuts currently included in the Republican tax bill, according to projections commissioned by Senate Democrats.

The listed hospitals are spread across the state, including three on the Western Slope, one in the San Luis Valley and two on the Eastern Plains. The report is based on one version of an evolving bill, so the final result could cause financial distress for fewer, or more, Colorado hospitals than anticipated.

Other types of providers, including community mental health centers and safety net clinics in Colorado, also expect to cut services or close locations, though groups representing the clinics don’t foresee providers going under entirely. The Senate report didn’t examine effects on provider types other than hospitals.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump, as passed by the House of Representatives, would add work requirements to Medicaid, increase the cost of health insurance on the individual marketplace and penalize states that cover undocumented immigrants, among other provisions.

A proposed amendment would also reduce states’ ability to draw down more federal funds by taxing health care providers, but its chances in the full Senate aren’t clear.

Continue reading on The Denver Post

Copyright 2025 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

https://www.denver7.com/news/local-news/medicaid-cuts-in-trump-tax-bill-could-close-6-rural-hospitals-in-colorado-report-warns

COLOR CODE: 

General item, but important. Gets at main point of article= YELLOW

Has a dollar amount or number = GREEN

A specific topic that seems to be different than other topics = BLUE

Alternative Headline:  UCHealth Wins Medicaid Fee Case

[MM Curator Summary]: A court sided with UCHealth in a dispute that may reallocate tens of millions in Medicaid funding and jeopardize rural hospitals’ finances.

==============================

UCHealth, Colorado’s largest health care provider, has prevailed for now in an exceptionally complicated fight with the state Medicaid agency over hospital provider fee money — a dispute that could see as much as $50 million a year shift away from public hospitals and move to private hospitals, according to state officials.

The fight has to do with whether two UCHealth hospitals that once were public, Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins and Memorial Hospital in Colorado Springs, should still be considered public. UCHealth, a private nonprofit, has for years managed the hospitals under its banner pursuant to long-term lease agreements.

But the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing continued to classify the two hospitals as public for the purposes of the hospital provider fee — a mechanism the state uses to draw down a boatload of federal money, much of which it sends back to hospitals.

Under the system, hospitals pay a fee based on their amounts of inpatient and outpatient care. The state combines that pool of money with the matching federal funds and then redistributes it, focusing especially on helping hospitals that treat a lot of Medicaid patients.

The end result of the system is that the hospital industry in Colorado as a whole comes out ahead, as do the vast majority of individual hospitals. Because Medicaid typically pays hospitals less than what it costs to provide a service, the money is vitally important for stabilizing some hospitals’ bottom lines and discouraging them from charging even more to privately insured patients to cover the shortfall.

A half-billion dollar system

In the most recent fiscal year, Colorado hospitals paid roughly $1.3 billion in fees and got back about $1.8 billion in payments, netting the industry a $500 million win. But some hospitals end up getting back less than they put in.

How this reallocation works depends in part on how a hospital is categorized — whether it is grouped with state government-owned hospitals, private hospitals or other public hospitals. The state had classified Poudre and Memorial as “non-state government owned,” but UCHealth disagreed and sued in state court to reclassify the hospitals as private.

Last month, a district court judge in Denver agreed, writing, “Because the court holds the hospitals are the sole owners and operators of Memorial and PVH (Poudre Valley Hospital), the court also holds Memorial and PVH were incorrectly categorized.”

The state is considering whether to appeal the judge’s ruling.

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, left, points to the COVID-19 vaccine in a small vial as he watches as Gina Harper, a clinical pharmacy coordinator, reconstitutes a dose of the vaccine before it is administered to the first patients in Colorado at UC Health Poudre Valley Hospital on December 14, 2020 in Fort Collins, Colorado. (Pool photo by Helen H. Richardson/The Denver Post)

The lawsuit focused narrowly on technical arguments about federal law and rules. But the context is this: Both Memorial and Poudre don’t currently benefit a lot from the provider fee system. Last fiscal year, Memorial netted less than $1 million, while Poudre paid in about $12 million more than it got back.

UCHealth spokesperson Kelli Christensen wrote in an email that recategorizing the hospitals “could result in higher payments,” but she added that it’s not certain, given the complexities of the system.

UCHealth is Colorado’s largest provider of services to Medicaid patients, and Memorial and Poudre treat more Medicaid patients than any other hospital in their respective regions, Christensen noted.

“Following federal law and correctly classifying hospitals is important to ensure proper payments to hospitals that care for Medicaid patients,” she wrote. “An incorrect classification can result in underpayments — and this hurts both the hospital and Medicaid patients.”

State warns of consequences

State officials say the court ruling could hurt other hospitals that treat a lot of Medicaid patients, namely the others categorized as non-state government owned public hospitals. This list includes Denver Health and a slew of small, rural hospitals operated by local hospital districts.

Nancy Dolson, the special financing division director for the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, said pulling Memorial’s and Poudre’s contributions out of that pool and moving them over to the pool for private hospitals could shift $25 million to $50 million annually away from publicly owned hospitals.

“We need to really recognize the impact and harm that, in some circumstances, could be more than significant to our rural hospitals and Denver Health if this decision would prevail,” Kim Bimestefer, the executive director of the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, said in an interview.

79% of hospitals benefit

Of the 85 acute care hospitals listed in the most recent annual report for the Colorado Healthcare Affordability and Sustainability Enterprise — the entity within the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing that collects and redistributes the fees — 67 received a net benefit last year.

The biggest beneficiaries were also some of the state’s biggest providers of services to Medicaid members — Denver Health and UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital.

At the other end, there were 18 hospitals that received back less than they put into the system, with HCA HealthONE Sky Ridge at the bottom. The hospital paid in $24 million more than it got back.

Provider fee under fire

The hospital provider fee could be up for big changes at the federal level.

A proposal by Republicans in the U.S. Senate, part of the under-construction version of the giant tax and spending bill, would cut how much states can charge in provider fees, thus also limiting how much matching federal dollars they could draw down. (The version of the bill that passed the U.S. House would have frozen existing fee rates in place.)

The nonpartisan Senate parliamentarian has ruled the provision out-of-order for how lawmakers have proposed passing the bill. But supporters in the Senate of the plan to cut fees, which is vital to GOP lawmakers’ goals for cutting federal spending to offset tax breaks, have vowed to press forward and find a way to include the provision — or a similar one — in the bill.

In the first year of the Senate proposal, the state estimates it would see $115 million less collected in provider fees and a subsequent $180 million hit to what it gets in federal funds. By the time the full weight of the Senate proposal is in effect in 2030, Colorado estimates it could see an annual loss of more than $550 million in provider fees collected and as much as a $2.5 billion hit to federal funding.

If that happened, it would not only impact the payments to hospitals but it would also impact Colorado’s ability to continue providing coverage to people under the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. The federal government currently pays 90% of the costs for people in the expansion group, and Colorado uses money from the provider fee system to pay the remaining 10%.

Joshua Ewing, the Colorado Hospital Association’s vice president of rural health, said at a roundtable discussion earlier this month with Gov. Jared Polis and U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen that both the cuts to hospitals and the impact on Medicaid members would be disproportionately felt in rural Colorado.

“I’m deeply concerned for rural communities in Colorado, our rural hospitals and the people of Colorado,” he said.

Type of Story: News

Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/06/27/uchealth-hospital-provider-fees-medicaid/

COLOR CODE: 

General item, but important. Gets at main point of article= YELLOW

Has a dollar amount or number = GREEN

A specific topic that seems to be different than other topics = BLUE