Posted on

OHIO- Gift cards offered as incentive for people on Medicaid to get COVID-19 vaccine

MM Curator summary

 

MCOs now offer $50 gift cards to increase vax rates among Ohio Medicaid members.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Some people visiting Butler County health clinics on Wednesday got a surprise: $50 gift cards for getting the COVID-19 vaccine.

“We’re willing to do whatever we can that’s legal and within reason to get people vaccinated so that this pandemic can be behind us,” said health commissioner Jenny Bailer of the Butler County General Health District.

The incentive is for patients on Medicaid, and it’s part of an effort to get more people vaccinated. According to Ohio’s five managed-care providers, people on Medicaid are vaccinated at lower rates than the rest of the population. Bailer said that this type of benefit isn’t easy to offer, so she was glad that the program was able to get off the ground.

“We’ve kicked around the incentive program in a lot of different ways,” Bailer said “There are a lot of barriers to implementing incentives, so we felt really happy that this one came through for us and we were able to do this with Medicaid.”

Another major motivation for getting the gift card reward to vaccine recipients was the slowdown in people showing up at vaccine clinics. Bailer said earlier this year Butler County was up to 33 different drive-through clinics; when they put out a call on Facebook, about 2,000 cars would show up. Things are much different now.

“Most of the people who really wanted to get vaccinated have gotten vaccinated,” Bailer said. “So now we’re reaching out to those who are a little bit harder to reach, maybe don’t have transportation, maybe they’re a little hesitant and they want to do a little education and think about it first.”

Emily King, a cashier at Dollar Tree, heard about the payout and was happy to have the convenience of a walk-in clinic Wednesday to get her first dose of the vaccine.

“I’ve been needing to get it for quite some time,” King said. “I thought, ‘Well, this is really close to where I live. I might as well get it done.'”

Fifteen-year-old Morgan Sloan was waiting to get the vaccine until she became eligible. She’s said she’s been living with extra caution and still masking and socially distancing herself from others.

“I kind of woke up and my mom said, ‘You’re getting your vaccine today,’ and I said, ‘OK, great, let’s go,'” she said. “I just feel safer being out in public, being around people.”

Kathy Eatmon of CareSource, one of Ohio’s managed care organizations, said in addition to the $50 gift card incentive, people are being assisted in registering for Ohio’s Vax-a-Million drawing. And for added motivation, the $50 gift card isn’t just for the first dose — it can be given for both doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Eatmon said she hopes that word of mouth will help drive more people to show up for the clinics.

“I always tell them to tell a friend,” she said. “If you know a friend who hasn’t received that vaccine, go ahead and tell them to come on out today.”

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wcpo.com/news/coronavirus/covid-vaccine/gift-cards-offered-as-incentive-for-people-on-medicaid-to-get-covid-19-vaccine

 
 

Posted on

Parson says budget cuts are coming next month if deal on Medicaid tax renewal is not reached

MM Curator summary

 
 

The Governor notifies the legislature that there will be program cuts if the provider-tax funding device is not able to be passed.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

By Jeanne Kuang | The Kansas City Star (TNS)

JEFFERSON CITY — Medicaid budget cuts are coming next month unless lawmakers strike a deal to renew a critical medical provider tax that underwrites a major portion of the state’s health coverage program for low-income residents, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson warns.

Lawmakers did not renew the tax, which expires Sept. 30, before they ended their session May 14. At issue was a fight led by Republican Sens. Paul Wieland, of Imperial, and Bob Onder, of Lake St. Louis, to insert language banning Medicaid coverage of certain birth control methods.

The tax collected from hospitals, nursing homes and pharmacies generates roughly $1.6 billion a year. That allows the state to bring in $3 billion in federal funds that is returned to the facilities for treating low-income elderly and disabled residents enrolled in the state’s $12 billion Medicaid program.

“The clock’s ticking on us,” Parson told reporters Monday. “If there’s not some sort of agreement where we have a solution, and it doesn’t happen before July 1, there’s not going to be choices. We’re going to have to start withholding [from the budget] July 1.”

 
 

Gov. Mike Parson signs prescription drug monitoring program bill on Monday, June 8, 2021. (Handout photo/governor’s office)

The $35 billion state budget sitting on Parson’s desk for the fiscal year that starts July 1 includes increased funding for homes for the developmentally disabled, higher Medicaid payments to nursing homes and expanded mental health services.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/parson-says-budget-cuts-are-coming-next-month-if-deal-on-medicaid-tax-renewal-is/article_9dbd8dc2-0cda-557c-8953-57dc73fd4319.html

Posted on

Missouri deems Medicaid expansion lawsuit an ‘attempt to circumvent’ constitutional requirements

MM Curator summary

 
 

MO AG offers arguments in the press ahead of the hearing.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — In response to a lawsuit regarding Missouri’s backtracking on Medicaid expansion, the state’s attorney general alleged that the suit’s interpretation of state law is “an impermissible attempt to circumvent bedrock constitutional requirements.”

Filed June 4, Eric Schmitt argued that the lawsuit, filed by three women who qualify for Medicaid coverage, is “premised on an incorrect statutory interpretation of HB 11 and other appropriations statutes enacted in the 2021 session of the General Assembly.”

Missouri voters initially approved in August a constitutional amendment for the expansion, but Gov. Mike Parson announced in May that the state would not move forward, citing a lack of funding.

The court documents, filed in Cole County, stated that the House bill’s plain text confirms that the funds were not appropriated through HB 11, which covers the Department of Social Services, or any other bill for Medicaid expansion.

“Under Article III, Section 51 of the Constitution, the constitutional amendment purportedly authorizing Medicaid Expansion could not and did not mandate an appropriation,” court documents state. “Rather, the General Assembly retained authority to appropriate, or not appropriate, funds for Medicaid Expansion. Because the General Assembly did not do so, Defendants lack authority to implement Medicaid Expansion and they lack appropriations authority to disburse taxpayer funds for that purpose.”

The voter-approved expansion included language stating that the federal government would reimburse the state for a majority of the expansion costs.

But the state argued that using federal funds to offset some costs associated with Medicaid expansion “does not make up for the lack of appropriations authority under state law to expend any funds, whether state or federal, for the purpose of implementing Medicaid expansion.”

Additionally, the state said that granting the plaintiff’s relief request would “violate the separation of powers provision of the Missouri Constitution.”

Stephanie Doyle, Melinda Hille and Autumn Stultz filed the suit against the Missouri Department of Social Services and its acting director, Jennifer Tidball; MO HealthNet Division and its acting director, Kirk Mathews; and the state’s Family Support Division and its director, Kim Evans.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.kshb.com/news/local-news/missouri-deems-medicaid-expansion-lawsuit-an-attempt-to-circumvent-constitutional-requirements

Posted on

DHS Working To Eliminate Medicaid Waiver Waitlist; Advocates Express Concerns

MM Curator summary

 
 

OK Medicaid has hired a vendor to conduct assessments of members on the 13 year waiting list for I/DD services.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Oklahoma health services officials are making an effort to eliminate the waiting list for services for people with certain types of developmental disabilities, according to Samantha Galloway, department of health services chief of staff. 

Right now, that waiting list is 13 years long. 

The waiting list is for the Home and Community Based Services Medicaid waiver that pays for services to keep someone with a disabling developmental issue living in their home or community. 

Galloway said that DHS is certain they have the support to make a bold move for funding that will support eliminating the waiting list.

“The governor’s office is super supportive, the House is super supportive, the Senate is super supportive, now is the exact right time,” she said. 

There are over 5,800 families on the waiting list. In the next six months, everyone will be contacted by an assessment group to talk about their family’s needs, Galloway said. 

In January, DHS will be presenting an analysis of needs and a cost estimate to lawmakers to come up with a plan to eliminate the waiting list. 

“This really is a game changer for the state of Oklahoma, and we really want to honor the commitment that we’ve said in the legislature for the five years that I’ve been here, that these people are important that we want to give them the dignity and the care that they deserve,” said Mark Lawson, appropriations and budget subcommittee chairman of the health services committee. 

But family advocates want to make sure the effort to eliminate the waiting list doesn’t shortchange families who need lifelong services that this waiver provides.  

“What we don’t want to see happen is short term solutions being offered to families in exchange for eliminating the waiting list,” said Lisa Turner, Arc of Oklahoma executive director and mother of a waiting list applicant. 

Even if immediate needs are met and families are taken off the waiting list, families could still be left in need if they aren’t in line for a life-long solution, she said. 

“Families that have children on the waiting list are living day by day, minute by minute. So, their need today is what they are focusing on, and maybe not focusing on when [the child] graduates from high school, or if [the parents’] health fails and they can no longer care for their child,” Turner said. 

The third-party contract to complete the assessment was awarded to Liberty of Oklahoma. Liberty is in talks now to determine a timeline for the assessment, according to Sue Nayda, Liberty of Oklahoma chief operating officer. 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.news9.com/story/60be9a32848d510bad8c4179/dhs-working-to-eliminate-medicaid-waiver-waitlist-advocates-express-concerns-

Posted on

Fate of Medicaid privatized managed care uncertain after Oklahoma Supreme Court ruling

MM Curator summary

 
 

The OK Supreme Court decision included a dissenting opinion that noted the legislature actually approved the move to managed care with the “guardrails” bill it passed when it thought it had to do managed care.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

The Oklahoma Supreme Court in a recent 6-3 decision invalidated the more than $2 billion in contracts the state’s Medicaid agency, the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, signed with companies.

John Clanton, Tulsa World file

OKLAHOMA CITY — The fate of privatized managed care for Medicaid patients in Oklahoma remains up in the air.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court in a recent 6-3 decision invalidated the more than $2 billion in contracts the state’s Medicaid agency, the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, signed with companies.

The state’s high court, among other things, ruled the agency did not have legislative approval or promulgate rules.

But of note is a dissenting opinion, by Justice James R. Winchester, that said the Legislature’s passage of Senate Bill 131 resolves the legal question because it authorized it.

Justices Dustin Rowe and John Kane IV joined the dissent, saying they would seek plaintiffs to show why the matter is not moot in light of Senate Bill 131 becoming law.

Senate Bill 131 became law without Gov. Kevin Stitt’s signature, who criticized it in his veto message.

“I appreciate the Legislature’s recognition that managed care is the best path forward for our state via the authority of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority retains,” Stitt said in allowing it to become law without his signature. “However, I have concerns that SB 131 will likely increase costs and limit our ability to improve health outcomes comparted to the original plan I proposed and this bill could also make it more difficult to detect waste, fraud and abuse in our Medicaid system.”

The measure put guardrails in place for managed care.

Sen. Greg McCortney, R-Ada, and Rep. Marcus McEntire, R-Duncan, were the authors of the measure. Both opposed the version of managed care put forward by Stitt.

“I believe what the governor will do is probably use Winchester’s dissenting opinion for a springboard for his next move,” McEntire said. “I think the Oklahoma Health Care Authority will most likely go back in and quickly promulgate emergency rules and try to rebid those requests for proposals.”

Winchester is married to Susan Winchester, a former Republican House member Stitt recently named as Secretary of Licensing and Regulation.

“The concern with that is the Oklahoma Health Care Authority still doesn’t have the legislative authority to do that,” McEntire said.

If McEntire is correct, he said the issue will likely wind up back in court. He said he wouldn’t be surprised to see the petitioners, several health care organizations that brought the suit, seeking an injunction to get it stopped.

The Oklahoma Health Care Authority referred questions about the matter to Stitt’s office, which shifted inquiries about it to the agency and a statement Stitt issued earlier.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling will unnecessarily delay Oklahoma’s efforts to improve health outcomes through managed care, which the Legislature confirmed is the right path forward for our state through Senate Bill 131,” Stitt said. “I will continue to work with the Oklahoma Health Care Authority to determine the next steps in the process.”

McCortney said the ball is in Stitt’s court, but his statement implies Senate Bill 131 gives him the authority to implement managed care, which is the furthest thing from what the Legislature intended.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Roger Thompson, R-Okemah, said getting managed care passed through the Legislature would be difficult.

McEntire said he was pleasantly surprised by the ruling.

“I believe this battle is far from over,” McEntire said.

Supporters of managed care believe it will create better health outcomes.

Critics say it will reduce rates for providers and create a shortage limiting access, especially in rural areas.

Plaintiffs in the suit were the Oklahoma State Medical Association; Oklahoma Dental Association; Oklahoma Osteopathic Association; Oklahoma Society of Anesthesiologists; and Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Kevin Corbett, Oklahoma Health Care Authority CEO, and the agency were defendants.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.kpvi.com/news/national_news/fate-of-medicaid-privatized-managed-care-uncertain-after-oklahoma-supreme-court-ruling/article_2ec7c4fb-dcc4-51c3-9bc1-35cbf20af7ec.html

Posted on

Vaya, Cardinal merge to take on Medicaid transformation

MM Curator summary

 
 

The consolidation of North Carolina behavioral health providers continues in advance of the tailored plan launch next year.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Two of North Carolina’s largest managed care organizations recently announced they will consolidate in preparation for the state’s transformation to Medicaid managed care. 

Vaya Health and Cardinal Innovations have already begun transition efforts, with Vaya assuming responsibility for coordinating services and supports for Cardinal Innovations members once consolidated. Together, the organizations will work toward a seamless transition focused on integrated, compassionate care for individuals with mental illness, substance use disorders and/or intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Vaya Health currently manages services for individuals in 22 counties in Western North Carolina. If approved by the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services and county representatives, the consolidation will expand Vaya’s operations to encompass benefits for the individuals and counties served by Cardinal Innovations. The proposed consolidation marks the fourth such endeavor for Vaya, having successfully led previous mergers with New River Behavioral Healthcare in 2007, Foothills Area MH/DD/SA Authority in 2008 and Western Highlands Network in 2013.

Vaya’s experience with transitioning members through consolidation efforts will be especially beneficial as the state’s public health care system is undergoing a significant shift. The first phase of N.C. Medicaid Transformation will launch on July 1, 2021, with five commercial health plans poised to manage integrated health benefits for the majority of Medicaid enrollees. 

 
 

As part of the second phase of transformation to BH and I/DD Tailored Plans, which are expected to launch in July 2022, Vaya and Cardinal Innovations have been preparing to evolve their operations to offer fully integrated care for people with a serious mental illness, a serious emotional disturbance, a severe substance use disorder, an intellectual/developmental disability or a traumatic brain injury.

According to a press release, the consolidation of the two organizations will enable a stronger health plan to serve individuals who receive care through North Carolina’s public health care system. It will also bring needed stability to members in counties served by Cardinal Innovations. 

“We believe that when we work together to meet the needs of our communities, we all benefit,” said Brian Ingraham, Vaya Health President & CEO. “Our number one priority throughout this transition will be to support members, providers and counties and avoid any disruption in care. We remain committed to offering a successful public service option as a Tailored Plan. It is a privilege to have the opportunity to strengthen the public model, support our county partners and serve even more North Carolinians on their journey toward health and wellness.”

“The passion and commitment of Vaya staff in serving our members and communities is beyond compare,” said Rick French, Vaya Health Board Chair. “The Board of Directors is pleased to expand that work to ensure Cardinal Innovations health plan members continue to receive quality services and supports.”

“We believe in our mission to improve the health and wellness of our members and their families,” said Trey Sutten, Cardinal Innovations CEO. “It has become increasingly clear that in order to deliver on that mission, we need to consolidate with a strong organization that has a history of meeting member and community needs and can stabilize the disruption caused by Medicaid Transformation and county realignments. I have known Brian and the Vaya team for years, and know that our members, providers and communities are in the best possible hands.”

Leadership for the two organizations will be working closely with DHHS as well as local and state government representatives to ensure a successful transition. The boards for each organization will establish a joint steering committee to guide the development of a transition plan that puts member, provider and county needs at the forefront of planning efforts. 

Vaya leadership will be visiting with each county to hear their concerns and learn about the unique needs of each community. Consolidation of the two entities under Vaya Health leadership is expected to be completed by June 30, 2022.

 
 

Clipped from: https://smokymountainnews.com/news/item/31531-vaya-cardinal-merge-to-take-on-medicaid-transformation

 
 

Posted on

Kemp’s Medicaid waiver plan marches on despite sharp criticism from federal review

MM Curator summary

 
 

GA is staying strong with its plans to use work requirements to expand Medicaid, with go live in a few weeks.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Georgia officials say they’re still working toward a July 1 launch of the waiver plan to add more people to the state’s Medicaid program, despite a harsh initial assessment by the Biden administration.

This story also appeared in Georgia Health News

The conflict with the feds involves the eligibility requirements that Georgia proposed and that the Trump administration approved. President Joe Biden, who took office in January, and his fellow Democrats have sharply different views on Medicaid than do former President Donald Trump and many Republicans.

Georgia’s waiver says that to get Medicaid coverage, a low-income adult is required to put 80 hours a month into a job, an education program, a volunteer organization or another qualifying activity. It is strongly backed by Gov. Brian Kemp, who has called it “a ‘hand up’ for hard-working Georgians in our state who are more than deserving.”

A February letter from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) criticized Georgia’s policies “that condition health care coverage on meeting work or other community engagement requirements.”

The Kemp administration fired back at the CMS letter, appealing the new federal position. The Georgia letter said the waiver’s possible revocation by the Biden administration would be “an arbitrary and unlawful bait-and-switch,” and would prompt a state challenge in court.

Other states with approved work requirements got similar federal letters. Later, CMS sent letters notifying Arkansas, Michigan, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin of its final decision to withdraw work requirement waiver authorities in those states, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

“None of these work requirements have passed muster in the courts,” said Bill Custer, a health insurance expert at Georgia State University. “The courts have said these violate the original purpose of Medicaid.”

A CMS spokesperson told GHN on Thursday that the agency is still reviewing the Georgia plan.

The Georgia Department of Community Health, which runs Medicaid here, said Wednesday that it is “still progressing toward implementing Georgia Pathways to Coverage,” the Medicaid waiver plan that is expected eventually to cover 50,000 people.

The launch is less than a month away. Kemp health care adviser Ryan Loke told the AJC that the governor’s administration has discussed the waiver issues with federal health officials.

And CMS sent Georgia officials another letter Thursday raising doubts about a key part of a second Georgia waiver: eliminating the health insurance portal healthcare.gov in favor of a privately run set-up.

Using waiver applications, states seek federal permission to make changes in certain health care programs. But as the Georgia situation indicates, getting and keeping federal approval can depend on which presidential administration is in power.

The waiver drama comes as the federal government dangles new incentives for states to pursue a much larger enrollment increase in Medicaid through a standard expansion of the program as called for under the Affordable Care Act, something most states have done already. Georgia is one of 12 states that have decided against that expansion, with Republican political leaders citing the cost involved.

Medicaid expansion is an idea clearly endorsed by the Biden administration. Under a COVID-19 relief law, the federal government has increased incentives for the 12 holdout states to pursue a regular Medicaid expansion.

A standard expansion would give Medicaid eligibility to 480,000 to 600,000 people in the state, according to the consumer group Georgians for a Healthy Future. It’s paid for with 90 percent federal funds, higher than the rest of the Medicaid program, which in Georgia is 67 percent federally funded.

States that expand the program at this point, though, would receive an additional 5 percentage-point increase in their regular federal Medicaid matching rate for two years.

So over that time, even factoring in the costs of implementing expansion, Georgia would net $700 million under the new incentives, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Medicaid currently provides health coverage to low-income and disabled residents, including about 2 million in Georgia.

Will the state fight?

If the feds reject the waiver requirements, the Kemp administration’s choices include dropping the whole plan, or battling the feds over the proposal in the courts, experts say.

Another choice would entail jettisoning the work and other requirements altogether, a move that likely would gain CMS approval. That would mean the waiver would cover many more adults – perhaps as many as 300,000 people, much higher than the 50,000 envisioned under the original waiver plan. That would have a big impact on the state budget, increasing Georgia’s costs.

And yet another alternative – and also costly – would be to fund this coverage without federal funding at all, running it as entirely a state program.

“If the governor is feeling an urgency to act and get Georgians covered, the quickest and easiest way to do that would be through Medicaid expansion,” said Laura Colbert of Georgians for a Healthy Future.

“Any attempt to implement the Pathways waiver without an official thumbs-up from CMS could put Georgia on the hook for 100 percent of the costs. That would add up quickly, likely outstripping the costs of Medicaid expansion while covering many, many fewer Georgians.”

Reinsurance plan will be spared

The Thursday letter from the feds indicated that Georgia’s proposed insurance waiver has one provision that will almost certainly get continued approval

That’s a “reinsurance” program that state officials estimate will cut insurance premiums for individual coverage by an average of 10 percent. Reinsurance aims to stabilize health insurance premiums by capping the cost that insurers incur in covering people with high medical costs.

The reinsurance provision has been embraced by both supporters and opponents of the Affordable Care Act.

But the new CMS letter showed concern over the state plan to replace the healthcare.gov enrollment system with a new online platform that people will use to sign up for insurance coverage. Under the plan, individuals would enroll directly through insurers, local brokers or agents, or through private-sector broker sites.

The Kemp administration says the 1332 Access waiver will help promote competition among insurance companies, reduce premiums and streamline enrollment for coverage.

But the letter from Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, the CMS administrator, said the state platform would be funded “by uncertain and unquantified private sector efforts, not by the state.”

She added that the regular insurance exchange, with enhanced subsidies and an extended enrollment window, is working well nationally and in Georgia. In Georgia, healthcare.gov brought in more than 67,000 new enrollees in the first 10 weeks of the special enrollment period, more than three times the number from the year before.

Laura Harker, senior health policy analyst with the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said Friday that “the state’s proposal to take away the most popular option for selecting a health plan—healthcare.gov—could exacerbate our state’s already high rates of uninsured Georgians and inadequate health care infrastructure. This letter from CMS is a step in the right direction to ensure no one loses access to care. The state plan is not clear on how much the private sector would invest in targeted outreach to get more people enrolled or how to ensure enrollees are not steered toward short-term or non-ACA-compliant plans that cover fewer services.”

The feds are asking Georgia for updated actuarial analysis by July 3 for the Georgia enrollment model, which is scheduled to debut in 2023.

Cody Hall, a spokesman for Kemp, said Friday that the state is reviewing the new CMS letter.

This story available through a news partnership with Georgia Health News.

Clipped from: https://thecurrentga.org/2021/06/04/kemps-medicaid-waiver-plan-marches-on-despite-sharp-criticism-from-federal-review/

Posted on

Great Circle, accused of overbilling Medicaid by nearly $2 million, settles case for less than $10,000

MM Curator summary

 
 

A MO behavioral health provider has successfully fought back $2M of services-not-provided allegations.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 

 
 

Jesse Bogan

WEBSTER GROVES — A highly publicized case that accused Great Circle of overbilling Medicaid for a lot of behavioral health services that may not have happened has taken an abrupt turn in the nonprofit’s favor. Instead of being on the hook for nearly $2 million, Great Circle must pay just $9,253.18, according to a recent settlement agreement that admits no wrongdoing.

“Great Circle’s policy is one of transparency — and that includes full cooperation with all reviews, audits and investigations,” Paula Fleming, Great Circle’s chief executive, said Tuesday in a news release. “We took this issue very seriously and, through collaboration, we were able to reach a conclusion both favorable to Great Circle and acceptable to the state.”

A January letter from the Missouri Medicaid Audit and Compliance Unit to Great Circle said $1,992,157 in “improper billing” had been identified. Great Circle, which has state contracts to provide an array of services for troubled youths across Missouri, many of whom have autism or are in foster care, appealed the audit findings to the Administrative Hearing Commission on Feb. 18, two weeks after a federal raid of its headquarters here.

According to records on file in the appeal, the audit was prompted by “data analysis that suggests possible over-utilization of therapy services.”

“The alleged overpayments are not based on any finding that the services for which (Great Circle) was paid were not actually provided, or any finding that they were not medically necessary,” Elizabeth Blackwell, an attorney for the nonprofit, argued in the original petition.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/great-circle-accused-of-overbilling-medicaid-by-nearly-2-million-settles-case-for-less-than/article_9b1d75a8-550c-5fd8-aab8-2c4db3cf9e14.html

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Three moms sue Missouri over Medicaid expansion

MM Curator summary

 
 

A lawsuit has been filed to force the state to move forward with expansion without funding for it.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Three single moms are suing the state of Missouri after the governor decided not to expand Medicaid. But the lawsuit could impact thousands of Missourians. 

After the General Assembly voted not to fund Medicaid expansion earlier this month, Gov. Mike Parson said there was no way the state could expand. In less than three weeks, the lawsuit will be in front of the judge who will rule if Missouri has to cover those making less than $18,000 a year. 

Lowell Pearson is a public policy attorney in Jefferson City who has focused on Medicaid expansion the past three years. He filed the lawsuit against the state, representing the three mothers. 

Special session could be on horizon for Missouri lawmakers to fund Medicaid program

“The trigger to this was the state withdrawing its state plan amendments,” Pearson said. “They [the three moms] fall into a gap in the system, really. They don’t make enough money to qualify for the old Medicaid program, but they are working people.”

One of the mothers is Stephanie Doyle who has three children and makes $12 an hour working a full-time job. According to the lawsuit, Doyle suffers from severe eczema and needs two medications but cannot afford them without health coverage. 

The lawsuit decision affects not only the three women, but thousands of Missourians. 

“What we’re seeking here is an order from the court that says the state has to enroll everybody who’s eligible. So this isn’t just about the three named plaintiffs; it’s about 275,000 other people as well,” Pearson said. 

Last August, 53% of Missouri voters approved to expand Medicaid. In the budget request to lawmakers in January, Parson asked the General Assembly to fund the expansion. It was expected to cost $1.9 billion, with less than $130 million coming from the state. 

“Every other constitutional right, the government has an obligation to carry out its job to be sure that, that right is enforced,” Pearson said. 

He said the lawsuit does not order the General Assembly to come back and fund expansion, just move to allow those eligible under the new requirements into the program. 

“Whether the money runs out during the course of the fiscal year is something to be addressed down the road. But right now, what we want the court to do is to enroll these people and give them the benefits that they constitution says they’re entitled too,” Pearson said. 

Some lawmakers previously said the ballot question was invalid since it didn’t have a funding mechanism. 

“I don’t think that argument holds water,” Pearson said. “There’s absolutely no requirement in the law that a funding mechanism be included.”

The trial is set for June 18 at the Cole County Courthouse in Jefferson City. 

“There will be a trial, although I don’t expect it to look like a conventional trial on TV,” Pearson said. “I don’t think there will be any witnesses called. Really it will be the lawyers telling the judge why they should win based on those facts.”

Pearson expects a ruling before July 1 but believes the state will file an appeal.

Pearson is joined by Jefferson City attorney Chuck Hatfield in lawsuit against the state. Circuit Judge Jon Beetem is presiding over the case.

The governor’s office said Parson does not comment on pending litigation. 

Clipped from: https://fox4kc.com/news/missouri-news/ttrial-date-set-after-3-moms-sue-missouri-over-medicaid-expansion/

Posted on

Another 10 years for Texas’s 1115 waiver? Experts say it’s unlikely

MM Curator summary

 
 

The TX request for 10 year approval in its resubmission request is likely to be rejected.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission’s (HHSC) inclusion of another 10-year extension in its Medicaid 1115 waiver extension request is unlikely to receive approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to some experts following the waiver. If CMS approves the extension, they are likely to only grant it for 5 years.

HHSC only asked for a five-year extension in its initial waiver extension application in January 2020, but the Trump administration increased the period to ten years in its approval.

 
 

Anne Dunkelberg, associate director of Every Texan, explained how atypical the Trump administration’s 2020 extension increase was:

“That’s one of only three examples ever in the history of Medicaid waivers of a state getting a ten year extension, and all three of them were done in the last several months of the Trump administration.”

Stephen Love, president and CEO of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council, agreed. He said although 10 years would be “fantastic,” a five-year extension is more likely.

Subsections (e) and (f) of Section 1115 of the Social Security Act state that both initial 1115 waiver approvals and subsequent extensions should last three years — five at the maximum. Despite this federal statute, the Trump administration’s CMS released guidance in 2017 stating it could grant extensions of up to 10 years to “routine, successful, non-complex” extension requests.

Dunkelberg said such a lengthy extension is particularly uncommon because 1115 waivers are designed to be temporary demonstration projects. In fact, the Obama Administration’s original approval of Texas’s 1115 waiver application in 2011 was intended to be a bridge for the state to eventually expand Medicaid.

“I am not expecting that the new administration will be taking the 10-year leap, but that’s just a guess. 1115 waivers are supposed to be demonstration projects.”

“…the 10-year extension request is inconsistent with federal statute, and the Texas extension request regarding expenditure authorities is far from ‘non-complex.'”

While the state’s current waiver doesn’t expire until September 2022, federal funding for its Delivery System Reform Incentive Program (DSRIP) will run out at the end of September of this year — placing considerable urgency on a replacement plan for, or renewal of, the waiver.

DSRIP provides critical funding for the state’s uncompensated care pool, hospital reimbursements and services for its Medicaid population. Dunkelberg said uncompensated care funding is the only “immediately pressing issue” concerning the waiver.

“The only thing that was in the Trump Administration’s approval that is now lost until there’s a new agreement is the HHSC request for a brand new, $1.5 billion a year for a brand new uncompensated care pool for local health departments and local mental health authorities.”

The public comment period for HHSC’s new extension request opened on May 28 and will last until June 31. Individuals can submit their feedback on the application draft either via email or U.S. mail, or by attending one of three public meetings organized by HHSC. The lack of a public comment period was CMS’s reasoning for rescinding Texas’s previous waiver extension in April.

Dunkelberg believes some of the feedback during the public comment period will concern the abnormally long length of the extension request. Given the public’s overwhelming support for Medicaid expansion, she also thinks HHSC will receive a large number of calls to expand Medicaid instead of extending the waiver.

“It is significant and meaningful for people in Texas to be able to express that both to HHSC and to the feds, and say, ‘Uncompensated care pools are great when you have the worst uninsured rate in the country, and we don’t have any problem paying better Medicaid rates either.'”

Following HHSC’s public comment period and its submission of the extension request to the federal government, CMS will hold a second, federal public comment period prior to its decision. 

“Under the federal law, there’s a thirty day minimum period that states can take public comment. So that’s comment from people — mostly in Texas, presumably — to the agency, which is supposed to be taken into account by the agency before they submit their request for extension to federal Medicaid. And then there will be another federal public comment period before the feds make their decision about whether or not to approve it.”

The timeline for CMS’s decision on the waiver isn’t set in stone, Dunkelberg explained.

“Typically, on everything that’s related to waivers, there’s usually a whole lot of informal back-and-forth, and question asking, and stuff like that. So how long it takes, in part, depends on how complicated or controversial things are.”

 
 

Clipped from: https://stateofreform.com/featured/2021/06/another-10-years-for-texass-1115-waiver-experts-say-its-unlikely/