Posted on

Virginia budget increases reimbursements for Medicaid dental care

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: After 17 years of no rate raises, dentists will get a 30% bump next year, adding $116M to the Medicaid spend.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (WVIR) – In the past few years the gap between private insurance and Medicaid has been growing in reimbursement for dentists. The new budget sets aside $116 million in state and federal funding to help fix it.

“The governor is going to sign this on July 1 that will give us a 30% increase in Medicaid reimbursement rates,” Charlottesville Pediatric Dentist Dr. Barrett W. R. Peters said.

Virginia’s new budget increases reimbursement rates by 30%. A change it hasn’t seen in years.

“For the past 17 years, there has not been an increase. The cost of doing dental business has increased about 60% in that period of time. So it’s very expensive to run a practice,” Peters said.

He says this raises benefits patients and providers.

“This reimbursement increase is humongous. It not only helps many patients across the commonwealth, but many children that need help, many adults that need help,” Peters said.

It incentivizes more providers to accept any Virginian who has dental insurance under Medicaid.

“They’re going to find more providers, more people that are willing to participate in a program, because they feel like they can run their business effectively, and take care of the patients that so desperately need this,” Peters said.

Peters encourages insurance companies to take a look at their own plans, so they can prevent toothaches before they even happen.

“So often, in my own practice, I find some basic things are not covered, fluoride twice a year, sealants, just very basic, preventive things, and I think insurance companies really need to work more with providers, and those of us on the ground of how we can best serve you,” Peters said.

This reimbursement increase will go into effect when the new budget does on July 1, 2022.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.nbc29.com/2022/06/26/virginia-budget-increases-reimbursements-medicaid-dental-care/

Posted on

CT- How much would it cost to insure undocumented Connecticut residents? A new report gives an estimate.

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Adding “Medicaid” for non-citizens will cost CT citizens another $83-$121M each year, with no federal match.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

For Patricia Rosas and other undocumented residents without health insurance, going to a doctor is an expensive last resort.

So, in the fall of 2019, after Rosas had been feeling an unfamiliar pain in her side for over a year, friends helped to raise $5,000 simply to get a diagnosis.

“My concern is, what if I didn’t know all those people?” Rosas said. “My story is thousands of people’s stories.”

A new study from the RAND corporation, though, suggests that extending HUSKY health coverage to all residents in Connecticut who are without documentation would cost 3% of the state’s annual Medicaid budget, putting quality health care within reach for more than 21,000 additional people.

A state feasibility study of Medicaid expansion to undocumented residents is also anticipated in coming days.

When Rosas first began feeling the pain in her side, she ignored it. She hoped it would go away, but it grew worse and more frequent.

In 2018, she visited a community health center, where providers couldn’t find the cause. The pain didn’t go away, so she took aspirin when it became unbearable but avoided going to the doctor.

“Every time when you need a doctor, the first thing [you need is] health insurance,” Rosas said. “That’s the first thing they ask.”

When Rosas finally made it to a specialist through the generosity of her friends, the doctor diagnosed her with kidney cancer. Once she received her diagnosis, she was able to get life-saving kidney removal surgery at St. Francis Hospital. She said
she applied for financial assistance through the hospital to help cover the costs.

The RAND study estimates that expanding HUSKY coverage to undocumented immigrants of all ages who qualify based on income would cost Connecticut between $83 and $121 million, which represents about 3% of the state’s $3 billion Medicaid budget for 2023.

In Connecticut, 94% of residents have health insurance, but among the state’s undocumented population, the share of insured residents is only 42%. Under the expansion, that rate could jump to 57% based on estimates of how many would enroll, representing 21,400 people who currently do not qualify for Medicaid because of their immigration status.

The legislature has debated the issue of Medicaid coverage for undocumented residents repeatedly over the last several years.

In June 2021, the legislature passed a bill qualifying children 8 and under who come from families earning up to 201% of the federal poverty level for HUSKY, regardless of immigration status. Children from families earning between 201% and 325% of the federal poverty level also qualify, subject to an asset test.

Earlier this year, a proposal to expand that coverage to all children under the age of 19 failed, not even garnering enough support to pass a legislative committee vote. Legislators ultimately passed a reduced expansion as part of the state budget that granted coverage to children 12 and younger and allowed any child enrolled in the program to keep the insurance through age 19.

The 2021 bill granting coverage to qualifying children 8 and under also called for the state to conduct a feasibility study regarding the extension of HUSKY coverage to children, regardless of immigration status, from ages 9 to 18, and to adults whose households earn up to 200% of the FPL.

A spokesperson with the Office of Health Strategy, the agency tasked with the feasibility study, said it will release its report to the legislature by July 1.

The RAND study examines the cost of implementation for different scenarios, including allowing undocumented residents to enroll in marketplace coverage and receive subsidies.

“What we hope to have really done with this work is to give policymakers a tool with which they can say, ‘OK, I want to implement this policy. How’s this going to affect enrollment? How much is this going to cost the state?’,” said Preethi Rao, a policy researcher with the RAND Corporation and the lead author on the study.

Rao and her co-authors also note that the cost estimates do not account for potential savings the state could realize from expanding eligibility. Hospitals could save anywhere from $63 to $72 million on uncompensated care, which is the loss incurred by providing services to people without insurance who will likely never be able to pay for them.

In 2021, the state also spent approximately $15 million through its emergency Medicaid program, which covers emergency care to people with qualifying incomes, regardless of immigration status. Presumably, the study explains, this cost would decrease “substantially” if more people had coverage.

According to the study, six states — California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Washington — and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid, or a similar program, to children up to 18 and pregnant people, regardless of immigration status. In California and Illinois, certain portions of the undocumented population over the age of 18 can also enroll.

Rosas feels lucky to have had the kidney removal surgery, but not having insurance still weighs on her. She’s supposed to have annual follow-up visits with a doctor but has already skipped one because she didn’t know how to pay for it.

Every time she feels pain, she can’t stop asking herself, “If something like that happened to me again, what am I going to do?”

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-news-connecticut-medicaid-undocumented-cost-health-20220629-auwsmqfpifcmzhit67rzyrhe4u-story.html

Posted on

Kentucky Psychiatrist Sentenced for Health Care Fraud Related to Referrals for Drug Testing at Greensburg Lab

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Varanise Booker admitted to a kickback scam that netted her a little over $24k.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

PITTSBURGH – A resident of Louisville, Kentucky, was sentenced in federal court yesterday for one count of health care fraud, United States Attorney Cindy K. Chung announced.

United States District Judge David S. Cercone sentenced Varanise C. Booker, 67, to 36 months of probation and ordered that she pay restitution totaling $24,217.26 to the Kentucky Medicaid program.

During the defendant’s plea hearing on October 5, 2021, Booker admitted that she was a licensed psychiatrist who operated a medical practice, Family and Children Behavioral Health Services, in Louisville, Kentucky. Between approximately October 2011 and August 2013, the defendant further admitted that she referred patients for drug testing and related services performed by Universal Oral Fluid Labs (“UOFL”), a clinical drug testing and drug screening laboratory located in Greensburg, Pennsylvania. The court was further advised that the defendant engaged in health care fraud by causing UOFL to bill the Kentucky Medicaid program for testing based on referrals that were outside the ordinary course of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose. Specifically, the defendant acknowledged that she did not document a legitimate justification for ordering certain drug tests and services, failed to document the results of certain drug tests and services performed by UOFL in her medical files, and failed to address the results of certain drug tests and services in the treatment of her patients. The defendant further admitted that she caused UOFL to pay her a certain portion of the reimbursements the laboratory received from Kentucky Medicaid in connection with her referral of unlawful drug tests and related services. As a result, the defendant caused losses to Kentucky Medicaid in excess of $20,000.

Assistant United States Attorney Eric G. Olshan prosecuted this case on behalf of the government.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation, and Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General Medicaid Fraud Control Section conducted the investigation that led to the prosecution of Booker.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdpa/pr/kentucky-psychiatrist-sentenced-health-care-fraud-related-referrals-drug-testing

Posted on

KY- Pilot program at Nulu farmer’s market provides free produce to pregnant women on Medicaid

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: KY launched a new program that gets pregnant mommas $24 a week worth of healthier food for a year.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Updated: 9:43 AM EDT Jun 21, 2022

 
 

A new program funded by the federal government aims to provide fresh produce for free to expecting mothers on Medicaid.With two growing kids, Sidney Ross knows the importance of having fresh fruits and veggies at her home. “Microgreens, which I really love microgreens, we got sweet potatoes and radishes today,” Ross said.This expectant mother is getting the produce she needs for her growing family thanks to a new program at the Phoenix Hill NuLu Farmer’s Market. The pilot program called the Fresh RX for mom allows pregnant women on Medicaid to get free produce worth up to $24 a week for 12 weeks. “I think the program is really awesome because it gives everybody an opportunity to receive healthy good vs unhealthy stuff,” Ross told WLKY.”The RX kind of emphasizes a prescription for healthy fruits and vegetables for pregnancy,” said Susan Borders, a Dietician with the program.It’s funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture through the Community Farm Alliance of Kentucky. “Pregnancy is a particularly vulnerable time for nutrition, good nutrition is very important,” Borders said.The sign-up process, which you can do in person at the market, takes less than 10 minutes. Each woman is given tokens to pay the farmers, who benefit also because their product gets sold. Michelle Lesher is a former nurse and dietician turned farmer who takes pride in what she grows.”When food is more ripe and ready to eat and picked, it’s going to have higher nutrition and it’s going to taste better,” Lesher said.But what puts a smile on her face even more is who her vegetables and fruit help. It’s why she wants this program to be as successful as possible.”Maybe there are some moms out there a little intimidated about eating more veggies, maybe intimidated by coming to farmer’s markets in general, so I would just encourage you to make this be the little push,” Lesher said.A push that Ross says she plans on giving to other mothers she knows.”I have already let people know and I’ve even invited people to let them know I’ll be there at this time, so meet me there that way I can take advantage of it,” Ross said.If you fit the criteria or you may know someone that does, go to the Phoenix Hill NuLu Farmer’s Market at 1007 E. Jefferson St. They are open only on Tuesdays from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

LOUISVILLE, Ky. —

A new program funded by the federal government aims to provide fresh produce for free to expecting mothers on Medicaid.

With two growing kids, Sidney Ross knows the importance of having fresh fruits and veggies at her home.

Advertisement

“Microgreens, which I really love microgreens, we got sweet potatoes and radishes today,” Ross said.

This expectant mother is getting the produce she needs for her growing family thanks to a new program at the Phoenix Hill NuLu Farmer’s Market.

The pilot program called the Fresh RX for mom allows pregnant women on Medicaid to get free produce worth up to $24 a week for 12 weeks.

“I think the program is really awesome because it gives everybody an opportunity to receive healthy good vs unhealthy stuff,” Ross told WLKY.

“The RX kind of emphasizes a prescription for healthy fruits and vegetables for pregnancy,” said Susan Borders, a Dietician with the program.

Recommended

Survivors dig by hand after Afghanistan quake killing 1,000

It’s funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture through the Community Farm Alliance of Kentucky.

“Pregnancy is a particularly vulnerable time for nutrition, good nutrition is very important,” Borders said.

The sign-up process, which you can do in person at the market, takes less than 10 minutes.

Each woman is given tokens to pay the farmers, who benefit also because their product gets sold. Michelle Lesher is a former nurse and dietician turned farmer who takes pride in what she grows.

“When food is more ripe and ready to eat and picked, it’s going to have higher nutrition and it’s going to taste better,” Lesher said.

But what puts a smile on her face even more is who her vegetables and fruit help. It’s why she wants this program to be as successful as possible.

“Maybe there are some moms out there a little intimidated about eating more veggies, maybe intimidated by coming to farmer’s markets in general, so I would just encourage you to make this be the little push,” Lesher said.

A push that Ross says she plans on giving to other mothers she knows.

“I have already let people know and I’ve even invited people to let them know I’ll be there at this time, so meet me there that way I can take advantage of it,” Ross said.

If you fit the criteria or you may know someone that does, go to the Phoenix Hill NuLu Farmer’s Market at 1007 E. Jefferson St. They are open only on Tuesdays from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wlky.com/article/pilot-program-at-nulu-farmers-market-provides-free-produce-to-pregnant-women-on-medicaid/40302471#

Posted on

LA- Nursing home magnate Bob Dean arrested on counts of cruelty to the infirm, Medicaid fraud

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: The case centers arounds decisions around evacuating residents during Huricane Ida.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Dean arrested in Tangipahoa Parish after evacuating 800+ nursing home residents to warehouse

 
 

 
 

The Louisiana Attorney General’s Office has arrested notorious nursing home magnate Bob Dean on counts of cruelty to persons with infirmities and other charges, nearly a year after Dean bungled the evacuation of hundreds of seniors ahead of Hurricane Ida last August.

 
 

Prosecutors arrested Dean after he turned himself in Wednesday on eight felony counts of cruelty to persons with infirmities, five felony counts of Medicaid fraud and two felony counts of obstruction of justice. Dean was booked in the Tangipahoa Parish Prison after a judge set a $350,000 bail, according to court filings and his lawyer. 

The Wednesday arrest was the cap on a 10-month long criminal investigation into Dean’s actions during Ida last year. Before the storm struck, Dean moved more than 800 elderly and frail residents from his seven nursing homes to a Tangipahoa Parish warehouse, which state inspectors shut down after observing residents calling for help that never came as trash piled up and air conditioning went out. Dean kicked inspectors off-site after the storm. 

More than a dozen residents died after that evacuation, though coroners have classified only five as “storm-related. Shortly after, the AG’s office opened its probe, and families of nursing home residents filed a slew of lawsuits against Dean.

The state also shuttered Dean’s nursing homes, while federal officials revoked his ability to receive money through Medicaid. Dean has filed appeals on both of those actions.

Dean “refused to move his residents out of the warehouse following Hurricane Ida, billed Medicaid for dates his residents were not receiving proper care and engaged in conduct intended to intimidate or obstruct public health officials and law enforcement,” the AG’s office said in a statement.

Dean’s bond requires mental health evaluation, ankle monitor

Dean’s attorney, John McLindon, said Wednesday that the Attorney General’s office contacted him earlier this week about the arrest and that Dean and his wife flew back to Louisiana on Tuesday. Dean moved to Georgia last year. 

McLindon said that Dean’s actions during the evacuation were not criminal. He said Dean was out of the state when Hurricane Ida hit, and that flights heading back to Louisiana were canceled. 

“When you hear the charge cruelty to the infirm — understand, Bob Dean was not there,” McLindon said. “He was out of state desperately trying to get back.”

McLindon asked Tangipahoa District Judge Jeff Johnson for permission for Dean to leave Louisiana and travel back to Georgia once he meets bail obligations, and that Johnson agreed. Dean was expected to bond out Wednesday afternoon. 

Top stories in Baton Rouge in your inbox

Twice daily we’ll send you the day’s biggest headlines. Sign up today.

e-mail address *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff’s Office Chief Jimmy Travis said Dean’s $350,000 bond includes conditions that he must wear an ankle monitor, surrender his passports and firearms and receive a mental health evaluation. Travis said Dean was also ordered not to leave Georgia except for medical appointments and to return to Louisiana for court. All of Dean’s court appearances must also be in-person, unless he’s confined to a medical facility.

McLindon said Dean is facing significant health problems; in other lawsuits Dean is facing, his attorneys have said he has dementia and other memory problems. Those health problems could “absolutely” become part of Dean’s criminal defense, McLindon said.

Dean is also facing criminal counts in other states. After an incident earlier this year where Dean shot his thumb off, police in Georgia charged him with reckless conduct, firing a weapon near a public road and firing a weapon on another person’s property. Dean is also under a criminal investigation in Oregon after cattle from his ranch had to be rescued from a snowstorm.

‘Cruelty to infirm’ carries stiff penalties 

In Louisiana, “cruelty to the infirmed” counts can be even more serious than negligent homicide. If Dean were convicted on any of those eight counts, he could face up to 10 years in prison for each, five years longer than the maximum penalty for negligent homicide. 

It’s rare for nursing home owners to face criminal charges, said attorney Jim Cobb, who represented the owners of St. Rita’s Nursing Home in St. Bernard Parish after 35 of their residents drowned in Hurricane Katrina’s floodwaters. A jury acquitted them in 2007 on dozens of counts of negligent homicide and cruelty to the infirm.

Cobb said that despite his victory in the St. Rita’s case, jurors are often predisposed to side with the elderly in cruelty cases. And he said the videos and photos of Dean’s residents crying out for help during the Hurricane Ida evacuation are powerful evidence against him.

Dean could try to make the case that some of his nursing homes were under mandatory evacuation orders and that staff did the best they could, Cobb said. Dean owned Maison DeVille and South Lafourche Nursing and Rehab in parishes that issued such mandatory orders for the storm. 

Meanwhile, prosecutors will need to try to prove that Dean’s mistreatment of his nursing home residents was intentional, he said.

Dean’s mental state could also have major bearing over the outcome of the case, Cobb said. He said the courts will try to determine whether Dean has diminished mental capacity and whether he’s capable of helping his lawyers to defend himself.

“He may pull a Junior on ‘The Sopranos’ and pretend he’s demented while avoiding criminal prosecution,” Cobb said.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/article_fc0bcd7a-f256-11ec-94d2-dbb30a30f961.html

Posted on

Dept. of Justice: DOJ announces Mallinckrodt to pay $230 million agreement in underpayment of Medicaid drug rebates lawsuit

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: The Questcor rebate scandal is winding down as states start to get their payout checks.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) announced today that Wisconsin has joined with 49 other states, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and the federal government to settle allegations of fraud against Mallinckrodt ARD, LLC (formerly known as Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), a U.S. subsidiary of the Irish pharmaceutical company Mallinckrodt plc (collectively Mallinckrodt), which sells and markets pharmaceutical products throughout the nation. The total value of the agreement is $233,707,865.18, plus interest, to be paid over a period of seven years. Of this amount, Wisconsin will receive $1,391,803.20, plus applicable interest.

“When companies break the rules of the Medicaid system, the Wisconsin Department of Justice works to hold them accountable and get restitution for taxpayers,” said AG Kaul. “Thank you to the team in our Medicaid Fraud Control and Elder Abuse Unit whose work ensured that Medicaid dollars will be recouped.”

The agreement resolves allegations that from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2020, Mallinckrodt knowingly underpaid Medicaid rebates due for its drug H.P. Acthar Gel (Acthar). The government alleges that Mallinckrodt’s conduct violated the Federal False Claims Act, the Wisconsin False Claims Act, Wis. Stat. § 20.931 (repealed 2015), the Wisconsin Medical Assistance Act, Wis. Stat. § 49.49(4m), and resulted in the submission of false claims to the Wisconsin Medicaid program.

Under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, when a manufacturer increases the price of a drug faster than the rate of inflation, it must pay the Medicaid program a per-unit rebate of the difference between the drug’s current price and the price of the drug if its price had gone up at the general rate of inflation since 1990 or the year the drug first came to market, whichever is later.

However, the government alleges that Mallinckrodt and its predecessor Questcor began paying rebates for Acthar in 2013 as if Acthar was a “new drug” just approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), rather than a drug that was first introduced to market in 1952. Allegedly, this practice meant the companies ignored all pre-2013 price increases when calculating and paying Medicaid rebates for Acthar from 2013 until 2020. In particular, the government alleges that Acthar’s price had already risen to over $28,000 per vial by 2013; therefore, ignoring all pre-2013 price increases for Medicaid rebate purposes significantly lowered Medicaid rebate payments for Acthar. Under the settlement agreement, Mallinckrodt admitted that Acthar was not a new drug as of 2013 but rather was approved by the FDA and marketed prior to 1990. Mallinckrodt agreed to correct Acthar’s base date AMP and that it will not change the date in the future.

As part of the settlement, Wisconsin will receive $1,391,803.20 in restitution and other recoveries. This settlement results from a whistleblower lawsuit originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The federal government, twenty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico intervened in the civil action in 2020. The settlement, which is based on Mallinckrodt’s financial condition, required final approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, which approved the settlement on March 2, 2022.

The Wisconsin Medicaid Fraud Control and Elder Abuse Unit, within the Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Legal Services, receives 75 percent of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $1,617,392 for the fiscal year 2022. The remaining 25 percent, totaling $539,126 for fiscal year 2022 is funded by the State of Wisconsin.

A team from the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units participated in the litigation and conducted settlement negotiations on behalf of the states. The team included representatives from the Offices of the Attorneys General for the states of California, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New York, Texas, and Wisconsin. Wisconsin Assistant Attorney General Katie M. Wilson served as the co-team lead for the states.

The requirements of 2017 Wisconsin Act 369 do not apply because this resolution is part of a bankruptcy proceeding and is not a “compromise or discontinuance of a civil action.”

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wispolitics.com/2022/dept-of-justice-doj-announces-mallinckrodt-to-pay-230-million-agreement-in-underpayment-of-medicaid-drug-rebates-lawsuit/

Posted on

NC- Lawmakers: House unlikely to take up Medicaid legislation

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: less than a week until the session ends, and the NC house hasn’t even brought it up in committee.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Two area state representatives doubt the state House will act on expanding Medicaid coverage during the short session of the General Assembly that is expected to end July 1.

The state Senate overwhelming voted earlier this month to expand Medicaid in the state but state Rep. Howard Hunter, D-Hertford, and Rep. Bobby Hanig, R-Currituck, both said Monday they don’t know if the House will follow suit.

The Senate voted to expand Medicaid on a bipartisan 44-2 vote with only two Republicans voting no. One of the no votes came from state Sen. Norman Sanderson, R-Pamlico.

Sanderson will represent Pasquotank, Perquimans and Chowan and five other counties in the next legislature after defeating state Sen. Bob Steinburg, R-Chowan, in the GOP primary in May for the newly configured District 1 seat. Steinburg voted for the Medicaid expansion bill.

Sanderson did not return either phone or text messages seeking comment about his vote.

The federal government would cover 90% of the cost of Medicaid expansion, with the other 10% being covered by an assessment levied on state hospitals.

If Medicaid expansion is approved it would likely cover an additional 500,000 to 600,000 people, many of them workers with one or two low-paying jobs who make incomes that hover just around the poverty line.

Republicans hold a 69-51 majority in the House and Hunter is not sure if there is enough GOP support to move the legislation forward. Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has long favored expanding Medicaid.

Hunter favors expansion and is confident that the entire House Democratic caucus also supports the Senate bill. Hunter said having the federal government pay for 90% of the cost makes it affordable for the state. North Carolina is one of 13 states that has not expanded Medicaid.

Hunter, however, said no House committee has held hearings on the legislation since it passed June 1.

“I’m behind Medicaid expansion 100 percent,” Hunter said. “It will be a great benefit to any rural area in the state. I doubt it will be taken up (by the House) in the short session. If it hasn’t been heard in committee by now, I doubt we will hear it. I don’t think there is enough support on the Republican side.”

Hanig said he likes some parts of the Senate Medicaid bill but is opposed to other parts that he “just can’t get behind.”

“It needs work and I think those negotiations will continue this week,” Hanig said. “We are still in discussions whether to take it up in the House. Still lots of room for improvement in the bill. We feel we have another solution and we will continue those negotiations.”

Hanig did not elaborate Monday on what parts he supports and opposes, saying he did not have the legislation in front of him.

“I don’t have it in front of me and it would be hard to speak to it without having it in front of me,” Hanig said.

A spokesperson for Sentara Albemarle Medical Center said it supports Medicaid expansion saying the hospital has been advocating for expansion for many years.

“Expanding Medicaid would support our mission to improve health every day by increasing access to preventive and routine care,” said spokesperson Randi Camaiore. “It would enhance opportunities for our community members, many who are hardworking individuals like famers, veterans, clergy and service industry workers before they need of emergency care or have higher acuity health needs. Medicaid expansion can improve the health of North Carolinians by increasing early detection for cancer, heart disease and other life-threatening illnesses.”

Hunter and Hanig are also not sure if the House will take up the controversial Parents Bill of Rights legislation that passed the GOP-controlled Senate almost entirely along party lines. Hunter opposes the legislation while Hanig supports it.

Some of the language in the legislation states that gender identity and sexual orientation may not be a part of the official curriculum until after third grade.

The legislation would also establish a parent’s right to request information about what their child is being taught in school, including lessons and textbooks and other information about how their child and their school are operating.

Hanig supports the bill because he said that parents have a right to know what their children are being taught in school.

“I feel that parents know what is best for their children,” Hanig said.

The GOP-controlled Senate passed the bill 28-18 with all Republicans and one Democrat supporting the measure. Because Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has promised to veto the measure, the GOP-controlled House would need the support of at least three Democrats to have enough votes to override a veto.

Hanig said he wasn’t sure if the House would vote on the bill in the short session while noting a lack of Democratic support so far for the legislation. He said GOP leaders may focus on other issues, including getting the state budget finalized, in the final days of the short session.

“The amount of effort it would take to get it passed and then have it vetoed just doesn’t do us any good,” Hanig said. “I believe the current sentiment is to get the budget passed. We want to concentrate on what we can get across the finish line (in the short session).”

The Senate-approved Parents Bill of Rights legislation must first pass through several House committees, including the Rules Committee of which Hunter is a member.

“It hasn’t come before us,” Hunter said. “If it comes up it will probably be a party-line vote.”

Clipped from: https://www.dailyadvance.com/news/local/lawmakers-house-unlikely-to-take-up-medicaid-legislation/article_8163b311-734c-5d0f-8eb7-72003a0b21d5.html

Posted on

Ohio Announces Three-Stage Medicaid Managed Care Transformation Roll-Out

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Ohio has announced a schedule to restart all its paused reforms.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

In May 2022, the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) announced that it would implement its Medicaid transformation initiatives in a three-stage rollout from July 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022. The first to go live is OhioRISE (Resilience through Integrated Systems and Excellence), a coordinated managed care program for children with complex behavioral health needs. In October, ODM will launch its centralized provider credentialing; and its single pharmacy benefit manager (SPBM). During the last three months of 2022, ODM will launch the seven Next Generation managed care organizations (MCOs).  ODM said the goal is to ensure member continuity of . . .

Clipped from: https://openminds.com/market-intelligence/news/ohio-medicaid-staggers-launch-dates-for-medicaid-managed-care-transformation-initiatives/

Posted on

Montana lawmakers probe new Medicaid director on privatization

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: Montana’s new Medicaid Director gets grilled on managed care out of the gate.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

The newly hired official tasked with running Montana’s Medicaid program got a grilling on Wednesday in his first public appearance before lawmakers, some of whom expressed concerns about the state potentially privatizing the system that handles health coverage for hundreds of thousands of low-income Montanans.

Montana is one of 11 states with an entirely government-run Medicaid system, which helps administer a range of healthcare benefits to more than 280,000 Montana adults and children. After a brief, tumultuous experience in the 1990s with what a 2008 legislative report called a “problem-plagued managed care contract,” the state has operated under a fee-for-service model in which providers are reimbursed for services they administer to patients who are covered by Medicaid.

Mike Randol, who previously oversaw Medicaid programs in Iowa and Kansas and started with the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Service in late May, told lawmakers on an interim health budget committee that his background in managed care is not necessarily a forecast for Montana’s Medicaid future.

“I have not had conversations with anyone relative to transitioning Montana to managed care,” Randol said in response to a question from Rep. Mary Caferro, D-Helena. “The only conversations I’ve had relative to managed care is sharing with [DPHHS] Director [Adam] Meier during my interview process my experience with managed care, as well as my experience with the fee-for-service.”

Republican and Democratic lawmakers returned to the topic of managed care several times over the course of Randol’s introduction to the committee, which lasted roughly twenty minutes. 

“I’ve gotten so many calls on this because people are very worried about Montana moving to privatization of our Medicaid program,” Caferro told Randol. Whether his plan includes managed care or not, she said, “what are your first steps and priorities for Montana’s Medicaid program?”

“My first priority for the program is to ensure we continue providing the services,” Randol replied, referencing provider shortages and geographic challenges that often make it hard for Montanans to access health care. “I’ve never been to Montana before, but it’s an extremely frontier, rural state, I can see.”

Senator Bob Keenan, R-Bigfork, also posed questions about Randol’s philosophy on managed care and what “opportunities” the new director might see “for managed care versus fee for service.” 

“It really is unique for each state,” Randol said. “If you’ve seen one Medicaid program, you’ve seen one Medicaid program … And it really is incumbent upon the state to determine what works best for that population. How can you provide those services to those vulnerable members in your Medicaid program? And that’s ultimately what we need to do.”

“My first priority for the program is to ensure we continue providing the services,”

newly hired Montana Medicaid Director Mike Randol

Since the state expanded adult Medicaid in 2015 under the Affordable Care Act, the number of uninsured people in Montana has dropped by more than 35%. Advocates often cite that statistic as an indication of the program’s importance for Montana residents under the current model. In contrast, many advocates still have a bad taste in their mouth left over from the state’s experience with managed care in the 1990s.

“On the managed care discussion, I would just say, as everyone across the state knows, it doesn’t give us a warm, fuzzy feeling,” said Mary Windecker, executive director of the Behavioral Health Alliance of Montana, during Wednesday’s meeting with lawmakers. “I’m not a fan of managed care and privatization at all.”

But Windecker and other providers also say the state’s current fee-for-service model, specifically reimbursement rates that fail to cover the cost of providing services, hinder the development of a robust network of health care professionals who opt to serve Medicaid patients. Meier, the state health department’s director, underscored that point on Wednesday to emphasize the fallibility of both funding models. 

“We’re in fee-for-service right now and I have providers banging down my door who are unhappy with rates,” Meier said. The success of a managed care program, he added, comes down to the fine-print details in contracts with the outside companies.

At other points in Wednesday’s meeting, Meier acknowledged that Montana’s current reimbursement rates are inadequate for retaining health care providers who serve Medicaid patients. Citing takeaways from an ongoing study of provider rates, Meier said it would cost Montana roughly $31.5 million to bring rates up to benchmark standards seen in other states, nearly a quarter more than what the state is currently spending on reimbursement. 

Randol told lawmakers that continuing to focus on the provider rate study is among his top priorities in the coming months. He also pointed to the anticipated end to the federal government’s COVID-19 pandemic public health emergency, which will allow states to remove ineligible people from their Medicaid programs for the first time since early 2020.

“We want to make sure that those that are eligible remain eligible and on the program, but those that are not, that we go through the redetermination process and ensure that we only keep those that are eligible,” Randol said.

The interim budget committee is scheduled to meet again in September. Another interim committee that oversees policies relating to DPHHS, the Children, Families, Health and Human Services Interim Committee, is scheduled to meet on June 27. According to the preliminary agenda, Randol is not scheduled to reappear.

 
 

Clipped from: https://montanafreepress.org/2022/06/15/montana-lawmakers-probe-new-medicaid-director-on-privatization-future-priorities/

Posted on

Georgia seeks input on new Medicaid contracts

MM Curator summary

[MM Curator Summary]: And so it begins.

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

Georgia is seeking input from individuals and organizations about what it should look for when it awards new multibillion-dollar contracts for the state’s Medicaid program.

The Georgia Department of Community Health’s request for information is the first step in the process of awarding the new health care contracts, which are expected to take effect by July 1, 2024.

Georgia’s Medicaid program contracts with private health insurers to provide health care services to around 1.7 million Georgians, most of them low-income children and pregnant women. The contracts are worth more than $4 billion annually.

Georgia is looking at five priority areas when deciding on the new contract holders: health-care quality, equity, access and outcomes, value, and coverage and services.

The request asks individuals, organizations, and companies to share feedback about the current program’s strengths and weaknesses and suggestions for improving outcomes, respecting linguistic and cultural needs, serving rural Georgia, and many other topics.

Responses are due by 2 p.m. June 24. Individuals and organizations should email responses to CMO.RFP@dch.ga.gov.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.mainstreetnews.com/barrow/georgia-seeks-input-on-new-medicaid-contracts/article_af17ff93-d454-5034-a330-e335ef0f9e56.html