Posted on

Settlement reached in Parkview Health Medicaid fraud case

 
 

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The Indiana provider wrote a $3M check to resolve issues with how it over-billed for blood-clotting tests.

 
 

Parkview officials deny any wrongdoing or false reporting, lawsuit says

 
 

Parkview Health(WPTA)

FORT WAYNE, Ind. (Fort Wayne’s NBC) – Parkview Health settled a state lawsuit for $2.9 million over allegations that the healthcare provider overbilled Indiana Medicaid over a four-year period.

Attorney General Todd Rokita’s office said in a news release on Tuesday that the health system submitted improper revenue codes to Medicaid for certain blood-clotting tests at several Parkview locations. They say the overbilling occurred between January 2017 and March 2021.

Officials say Parkview cooperated in fixing the problem once it was brought to their attention, however, the settlement notes that Parkview officials deny any wrongdoing or false reporting.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.fortwaynesnbc.com/2022/09/27/settlement-reached-parkview-health-medicaid-fraud-case/

Posted on

Centene settles Medicaid fraud claims with Texas for $165 million

 
 

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The TX price extracted for Centene PBM ruh-rohs has been set at $165M

 
 

Centene made no admission of liability and maintained its business practices are lawful. 

 
 

Photo: Jose Luis Pelaez/Getty Images

Centene has settled with Texas for $165 million to resolve claims of Medicaid fraud by the Texas attorney general.

Centene made no admission of liability, and maintained that its business practices were lawful. 

Under the terms of the settlement, Centene will pay more than $165.6 million to resolve Attorney General Ken Paxton’s investigation into whether certain of Centene’s business practices violated the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act. The AG alleged that Centene overcharged Medicaid in the prescription drug program.

Paxton announced the finalization of the settlement with Centene and its subsidiaries that provide services to the Texas Medicaid program. Centene, based in St. Louis, Missouri, serves as an intermediary for government-sponsored and privately insured healthcare programs.

WHY THIS MATTERS

This is the latest in a string of settlements for Centene.

In August, the company agreed to pay more than $33 million to resolve claims that it overcharged Apple Health in Washington, the state’s Medicaid program, according to Reuters.

In June, Centene agreed to pay $13.7 million to New Mexico to settle an investigation of inflationary pricing and reporting of pharmacy benefits in the state’s Medicaid program.

THE LARGER TREND

Centene has settled similar claims with 10 other states, including New Hampshire, Ohio and Mississippi, for a total of more than $260 million, according to the Reuters report.

ON THE RECORD 

“Protecting taxpayer funds and the financial integrity of the Texas Medicaid Program is a top priority for my office,” said Attorney General Paxton. “The results we achieved in this case send a clear message to providers that Texas expects transparency from its Medicaid partners as required by Texas law.”   

Clipped from: https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/centene-settles-medicaid-fraud-claims-texas-165-million

Posted on

Medi-Cal providers fear disruption to patient care

 
 

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The protests are in process in the press for the recent mega-procurement in California. Losing community plans are sounding the alarm about the impact of them going away.

 
 

In summary

The state’s new Medi-Cal contracts are part of an overhaul to improve patient care. But some say the new providers aren’t fully prepared to handle more Medi-Cal patients.

More than 1.7 million Medi-Cal patients may get a new insurance provider in the coming months as a result of the state’s first-ever competitive bidding process, but critics and some providers fear the change will cause major disruptions to care.

California’s Department of Health Care Services last month announced its intent to award $14 billion-worth of Medi-Cal contracts to three companies — Health Net, Molina and Anthem Blue Cross — down from nine. The deal is part of the department’s multifaceted effort to overhaul the behemoth program that provides health insurance for a third of all state residents. Medi-Cal is the state’s version of federal Medicaid, which serves low-income residents. 

“We are raising the bar for all of our managed care partners,” state Medicaid Director Jacey Cooper said. “We will be very focused on quality and access to care.”

The new contract includes strict new quality standards for patient outcomes and financial penalties for providers that do not meet the goals. The new benchmarks are “significantly better” than previous standards and competitive bidding is long-overdue, said Kiran Savage-Sangwan, executive director of the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network.

“This is a really big deal. It’s something that we have consistently advocated for the state to do more often and on a specific schedule in order to maintain accountability,” Savage-Sangwan said.

Many patients will keep the same insurance provider, but in four counties — Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento and Kern — the largest incumbent plans were ousted, precipitating a significant transition for nearly half of commercial Medi-Cal patients.

“We are raising the bar for all of our managed care partners. We will be very focused on quality and access to care.”

state Medicaid Director Jacey Cooper

An ‘immeasurable’ disruption

In Los Angeles, Health Net, the largest Medi-Cal managed care plan in the state, lost its coveted contract to Molina. More than 1 million patients, roughly one-third of all Medi-Cal enrollees in the county, have Health Net. The other two-thirds have coverage through the county-operated L.A. Care Health Plan.

Medical providers in L.A. that serve primarily Medi-Cal patients say the decision to offer Molina the county contract could cause “immeasurable” disruption.

“It would be profound,” said Jim Mangia, president and CEO of St. John’s Community Health in south L.A. “You’re talking about completely changing providers and provider networks. It would completely interrupt their systems of care.”

Nearly 25,000 patients at St. John’s — a quarter of the facility’s patient population — have Health Net and would need to switch to Molina, which has far fewer patients and providers. Expecting the company to contract with an equivalent number of doctors and specialists as Health Net in the next year is unreasonable, Mangia said. 

The state expects new contracts to be fully implemented by January 2024 with the transition period starting as soon as Oct. 10. 

“They’re a minor player in the Medi-Cal market. “Can they get 10 times bigger in that many months? I doubt it,” Mangia said. “You’re going to see a tremendous lack of access to specialty care, to hospital care and to primary care.”

“Can they get 10 times bigger in that many months? I doubt it.”

Jim Mangia, president and CEO of St. John’s Community Health

Molina did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Health Net Vice President of Communications and Marketing Darrel Ng said in a statement that the company would defer to providers’ assessment of the ramifications of the contract change.

Health Net appealed the state’s decision in Los Angeles and eight other counties where it lost bids. In the L.A. appeal documents, Health Net alleges that the state’s decision to move to Molina will “jeopardize the stability of Medi-Cal and its provision of services to California’s most vulnerable.”

Some providers, however, were less concerned about the change, predicting that there would not be much of an impact on patients. 

“In theory nothing should change. Technically, Health Net and Molina switching places should have no impact on the consumer,” said David Ryu, chief strategy and advancement officer at Kedren Community Health Center, a primary care and acute psychiatric hospital system in South L.A.

That assessment, however, assumes Health Net will subcontract with Molina, giving them access to their network of providers. Neither Health Net nor Molina have stated whether they will pursue that option.

If Molina retains the contract offer after the appeal process, Medicaid Director Cooper said there will be a 15-month transition period to ensure enrollees are aware of the change and do not experience any interruptions in coverage. 

“We’ve been planning for this transition for months, probably even close to a year at this point,” Cooper said. 

That planning includes hiring staff dedicated to the transition and contracting process and ensuring provider networks overlap significantly enough to prevent patients from losing access to doctors. 

“We will make sure through our readiness process of all managed care plans…that they are ready and able to handle those continuity-of-care requests,” Cooper said.

Mangia predicted, however, that community health centers will be left to handle the most vulnerable and difficult-to-manage patients. A third of St. John’s patients do not have valid phone numbers or addresses, largely due to housing instability. Those patients frequently have complex health needs and providers are only able to find them when they show up at emergency rooms.

“Where are they going to send the letter? The state is going to send them a letter that says ‘You no longer have Health Net. You need to choose a new plan.’ Then people come in, they don’t understand it, they need help filling out the application. That’s a huge responsibility to dump on community health centers,” Mangia said. 

“Every time there’s a change in health care in California, the cost and work of doing it gets pushed on the (health centers).”

Holding plans to higher standards

The state intends to award 28 new contracts across 21 counties to Health Net, Molina and Anthem Blue Cross, but the selections have raised questions about whether the plans can actually meet the new quality standards. Over the past decade, health outcomes and quality metrics have stagnated or gotten worse for Medi-Cal enrollees, and the three winners, which have current contracts across two-thirds of the state, maintain spotty track records. 

Some of the new requirements include:

  • Meeting updated quality benchmarks; 
  • Publishing reports on patient outcomes, appointment access and wait times, and patient satisfaction;
  • Investing up to 7.5% of annual profits into community-based organizations with additional investments required if quality benchmarks are missed;
  • Hiring a chief equity officer and developing a plan to reduce health disparities;
  • Monitoring primary care utilization and identifying patients that may be missing preventive care opportunities.

In 2019, the department updated its quality benchmarks, requiring California Medi-Cal plans to perform better than 50% of all Medicaid plans nationwide. The previous requirement was to do better than 25% of plans nationwide. Enforcement of the benchmarks was suspended due to COVID-19.

“Before we were letting all of our plans fail. Now we’re holding them to the average,” Savage-Sangwan said.

Anthem Blue Cross, which was offered the greatest number of contracts, historically has achieved poor to mediocre outcomes. For example, between June 2020 and July 2021, Anthem failed to meet 59% of its quality benchmarks across the 12 regions where it serves Medi-Cal members. Those metrics include breast cancer screenings, diabetes management and completion of childhood immunizations. 

Health Net had a similar failure rate across seven counties. while Molina failed to meet quality benchmarks 38% of the time across four counties. Ng, of Health Net, said COVID-19 made 2020 “a difficult year for all of us” when it came to meeting quality standards, but the company recognizes the need for improvement and has made a “multi-million-dollar investment in quality over the past several years.”

Anthem and Molina did not respond to requests for comment. The state Department of Health Care Services said three years of quality metrics were analyzed during the bidding process.

Losing bidders have submitted appeals in more than half the counties where bidding took place, claiming competitors overpromised their Medi-Cal services and that the Department of Health Care Services implemented an unfair scoring system. 

One such appeal came from Community Health Group, the largest Medi-Cal provider in San Diego County and one of the highest-performing insurance plans in the state. It lost the initial bid to Health Net and Molina.

“(The decision) was quite shocking,” said chief operating officer Joseph Garcia. “In every measurable metric, we are way ahead.”

In 2019, Community Health Group was the fourth-highest-ranked Medi-Cal insurer in the state, according to state data, beaten only by San Francisco Health Plan and two Kaiser plans, which tend to serve healthier patients. In contrast, Molina’s San Diego plan ranked 16th and Health Net’s ranked 29th.

Garcia said he has “a lot of questions and a lot of concerns” about how the Department of Health Care Services awarded points to bidders. Health Net and Molina were awarded points for proposing community engagement strategies that Community Health Group already implements, he said.

“We’re going to give you more points because you’re going to do something? We should get more points because we’re already doing it and members don’t have to wait,” Garcia said. 

Like in L.A. County, San Diego providers say this decision will cause a major disruption to patient care. Community Health Group serves the largest proportion of Medi-Cal patients — approximately 326,000 — out of the seven Medi-Cal insurers in the county. 

“Good grief. Medi-Cal populations have a complexity of needs. It’s not like we can just transfer them and give them a new card. ” said Zara Marselian, CEO of La Maestra Community Health Centers in San Diego. “We’re going to have to hire more staff.”

“Medi-Cal populations have a complexity of needs. It’s not like we can just transfer them and give them a new card. ”

Zara Marselian, CEO of La Maestra Community Health Centers

Marselian said La Maestra has worked with Community Health Group for nearly three decades and its history as a health center that grew into a Medi-Cal insurance plan gives it insight into what the population needs. 

“They started managed care before the state did managed care,” she said. “They really understand the Medi-Cal population, the challenges, the disparities and the incredible amount of work it takes to help them navigate through all of the systems so they can attain health and well-being.”

We want to hear from you

Want to submit a guest commentary or reaction to an article we wrote? You can find our submission guidelines here. Please contact CalMatters with any commentary questions: commentary@calmatters.org

 
 

Clipped from: https://calmatters.org/health/2022/09/medi-cal-providers/

Posted on

Colorado’s new Medicaid Director focused on partnering with RAEs to prepare for end of PHE

 
 

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Welcome and congrats to Adela Flores-Brennan, who joins the CO program as the new Medicaid Director.

 
 

 
 

Colorado’s Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) announced earlier this month the appointment of Adela Flores-Brennan as State Medicaid Director. She also assumed the leadership role for the Health Policy Office (formerly called the Health Programs Office), which develops and oversees Health First Colorado and CHP+ medical policies and contracts. 

 
 

 
 

Get the latest state-specific policy intelligence for the health care sector delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe

 
 

Flores-Brennan joined the department in May 2022 and previously served as the Executive Director of the Colorado Consumer Health Initiative. She brings over 20 years of experience in Colorado public policy and advocacy to the new role.

Her appointment comes as the department prepares for the end of the Public Health Emergency (PHE), which the Biden administration has signaled will end in January of 2023. The PHE designation allows HCPF to extend continuous coverage, maintenance of effort, and other policies and waivers approved by the federal government. The PHE also provides additional enhanced federal funding that HCPF says has been critical during the economic downturn.

Brennan-Flores says she is focused on mitigating the loss of coverage for members resulting from the end of PHE extended coverage and starting  Medicaid redeterminations.

“It’s going to be really important to partner with our marketplace and other partners like the RAEs [Regional Accountable Entities] to make sure that we have a good landing place for people who are no longer eligible and that we’re doing the best that we can to do our renewals in a timely way so that people can remain covered,” Flores-Brennan said.

Other key priorities for Flores-Brennan are improving vaccination rates for children and BIPOC communities, addressing maternal health equity, and working to ensure equity in behavioral health. 

“We have a lot of health equity priorities moving forward,” she said. “[We are focused on] really working to advance health equity by implementing programs to support health for our members [and] eliminating avoidable differences.”

This month, HCPF created a new Office of Medicaid and CHP+ Behavioral Health Initiatives and Coverage, which will govern behavioral health strategies and projects. Flores-Brennan said she will be working closely with the office’s new Director, Cristen Bates, to support the efforts of the Behavioral Health Administration in transforming the behavioral health system.

She said she looks to leverage her advocacy work in community-based organizations to improve Medicaid access and services, and is excited to engage stakeholders on the work ahead. 

“I really want to take some time to do some thoughtful and intentional engagement with our stakeholders,” Flores-Brennan said. “Especially those with lived experiences. And in doing that, to be responsive to their needs and issues that they’re raising. So I’m hoping that as soon as I can come up for air, I can get out in front of our various stakeholder communities and start meeting with folks … Recognizing that of course, we can’t have that quality of care and access to care without key partnerships with our providers and our MCOs.”

Clipped from: https://stateofreform.com/featured/2022/09/colorados-new-medicaid-director-focused-on-partnering-with-raes-to-prepare-for-end-of-phe/

Posted on

Which states process Medicaid applications the fastest

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: 10 states are processing 80-100% of their Medicaid claims in 7 days or less.

 
 

CMS released data Sept. 1 showing how quickly states processed new applications for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program in the first three months of 2022. 

According to the report, in January through March 2022, more than half of Medicaid applications were processed within 24 hours, and about two-thirds were processed within seven days. 

In 20 states and Washington, D.C.,,more than 60 percent of applications were processed within seven days.

See the full list of how the states stacked up below. 

 

Processed 80-100% of applications within 7 days 

Alabama

Connecticut

District of Columbia

Maryland

Massachusetts

New York

Oklahoma 

Oregon

Rhode Island

Washington

 

Processed 60-80% of applications within 7 days 

Colorado

Delaware

Hawaii 

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Minnesota

New Hampshire 

Tennessee

Vermont

Utah

 
 

Processed 40-60% of applications within 7 days 

Georgia 

Idaho

Iowa

Michigan

Nebraska

New Jersey 

New Mexico

North Carolina

Pennsylvania

South Carolina 

West Virginia

Wisconsin

 
 

Processed 20-40% of applications within 7 days 

Alaska

Arizona

Florida 

Indiana

Montana

Ohio

Texas

Virginia 

Wyoming

 
 

Processed less than 20% of applications within 7 days 

Arkansas

Maine 

Misississippi

Missouri

North Dakota

 
 

State did not report data 

California

Illinois

Nevada

South Dakota

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckerspayer.com/uncategorized/see-which-states-process-medicaid-applications-fastest.html

Posted on

Maryland seeks Medicaid non-emergency medical transportation contractor

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The RFP will move NEMT management from the local health departments to a private sector vendor who will integrate with the MMIS.

 
 

 
 

Nicole Pasia | Sep 13, 2022 | Maryland

The Maryland Department of Health (MDH) released a request for proposals (RFP) this month for a non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) contractor for the state’s Medicaid population. MDH intends to award a single contract award for a maximum period of 7 years.

 
 

 
 

Get the latest state-specific policy intelligence for the health care sector delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe

 
 

The contract will fulfill requirements under the Code of Federal Regulations, which mandates that states provide NEMT to Medicaid-covered services as a last resort when the participant has no other means of transport. 

“The contractor is to assure access to transportation for eligible and qualified participants to and from non-emergency Medicaid covered services rendered by Medicaid providers in the most cost effective and efficient clinically appropriate transportation mode,” the RFP said. 

For the past 2 decades, Maryland has administered NEMT through the local health departments in each of its 23 counties (with the addition of Baltimore City), totaling 24 jurisdictions. MDH pays for NEMT services through pass-through grants. Federal funding also supports the NEMT program, with a 50% match of state funds. 

The RFP lists the progression of transportation types the program would use, based on patients’ clinical needs. These include a shared ride ambulatory vehicle, shared ADA-accessible vehicle, ambulance, interfacility transfer for tertiary care, and air ambulance service transport. 

Over 946,000 NEMT trips occurred in fiscal year 2019, according to the RFP. MDH typically spends $50 million annually on the NEMT program. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted operation numbers (there were about 814,000 trips in FY 2020 and only 104,000 trips in FY 2021, mostly due to the increased use of telemedicine). However, the RFP notes that restrictions on in-person medical appointments have been lifted since July 1st, 2021. 

“Accordingly, for FY 2022 and beyond, it is expected that transports will return to the pre-FY20 levels,” the RFP said. 

The awarded contractor will work with MDH’s Medicaid Modular Transformation (MMT) Project to design and develop the procedures and information technology needed to provide NEMT services. During the first phase of the operations and maintenance (OM) stage, which is estimated to last a maximum of 18 months from the contract start date, the contractor must inaugurate NEMT services in at least 9 of the 24 jurisdictions. During the second phase, covering the 6 months following the completion of the first phase, the contractor must onboard the remaining jurisdictions. 

The NEMT contract is also part of the Maryland Medicaid Enterprise Systems Modular Transformation (MMT) Program Management Office (PMO), which works to redesign and modernize Maryland’s Medicaid Management Information system (MMIS). MMT PMO is a multi-year project expected to be fully implemented in 2029.

“To successfully administer the NEMT … the Contractor must seamlessly integrate with the legacy MMIS,” the RFP said. “To ensure that NEMT aspects are properly accounted for in MMT, the Contractor must have continual representation on MMT workgroups, steering committees, etc. And as the MMIS transitions under MMT, the Contractor must, in lockstep, transition its interfaces and connectivity.”

A pre-proposal conference is scheduled for Sept. 15th at 1 p. Eastern Time. Participants must register via Attachment A of the RFP. Questions about the RFP may be sent through the Non-Emergency Medical Transportation RFP Inquiry Form.

Proposals are due on Nov. 1st at 4 pm Eastern Time via the eMaryland Marketplace Advantage (eMMA). The contract is expected to begin on Feb. 1st, 2023. 

 
 

Clipped from: https://stateofreform.com/news/maryland/2022/09/maryland-seeks-medicaid-non-emergency-medical-transportation-contractor/

Posted on

West Virginia Recognized for Innovations in its Medicaid Program

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Several states (including WV) were recognized by RWJF this week for innovations in their Medicaid program. WV got noticed for its work to improve care for foster kids.

 
 

West Virginia’s Medicaid program, administered by the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources’ (DHHR) Bureau for Medical Services (BMS), has received a 2022 Medicaid Innovation Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Academy for State Health Policy.  The award recognizes states for demonstrating creativity, leadership, and progress in their Medicaid programs. 

West Virginia Medicaid was recognized as the Care Coordination for Vulnerable Populations recipient for providing specialized managed care for youth in foster care by delivering continuity in health care through the most integrated and cost-effective way possible, and ensuring quality across services.

“This award underscores DHHR’s dedication to improving health care services for residents, especially vulnerable children at-risk of out-of-home placements,” said Cindy Beane, BMS Commissioner. “We will continue focusing on enhancing children’s services and remain committed to administering, promoting, and assuring strategies that improve the quality of life for all West Virginians served by the Medicaid program.”

Children in foster care are more likely to have complex health conditions, higher rates of trauma from abuse and neglect, and limited access to health care services. 

“Improved access to medical and behavioral health care for West Virginia’s youth in foster care has been a team effort and priority,” said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary. “I am proud of the hard work and leadership from Commissioner Beane and the collaboration across DHHR’s bureaus to meet this critical need.”

Medicaid is a joint state-federal health insurance program that covers one in five people in the United States, including elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities, and 40% of all children nationwide. 

“Medicaid enables states to develop tailored, creative solutions to local challenges, and when faced with an unprecedented pandemic, Medicaid leaders dug deep to develop innovative approaches to care,” said Tara Oakman, interim managing director at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “While it remains a difficult period for Medicaid programs, all states can learn from successes in other states in improving Medicaid access, care delivery, and equity.”

Further information about Medicaid and related resources in West Virginia can be found on the BMS website

 
 

Clipped from: https://dhhr.wv.gov/News/2022/Pages/West-Virginia-Recognized-for-Innovations-in-its-Medicaid-Program.aspx

Posted on

New poll shows South Dakota voters are leaning toward expanding Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Right now the yeses have it at 62%. Just in time for the PHE wind-down.

 
 

 
 

Medicaid expansion(WITN)

RAPID CITY, S.D. (KEVN) – As the November midterm elections approach, voters are focused on a wide variety of candidates and issues.

However, as one recent poll shows voters could also be looking to expand healthcare access in South Dakota.

A state-wide poll conducted in late August confirmed what officials from the American Cancer Society say they’ve known for a while.

“South Dakotans want to see Medicaid expanded and the majority of voters, 62%, plan to support Amendment D in November,” stated David Benson, Senior State and Local Campaigns Manager for the American Cancer Society.

Amendment D would amend the South Dakota state constitution and provide Medicaid benefits to people ages 18-65 with an income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level.

This would expand access to health care for thousands of South Dakotans.

“Those that may not afford health insurance on their own or they’re not provided health insurance through their provider. So, that is going to help those that are caught in the middle. They either make too much to qualify for Medicaid, traditional Medicaid, and they don’t make enough to get those subsidies to go on the marketplace,” explained Benson.

Benson added there are also financial incentives for states that haven’t expanded their Medicaid yet.

“To keep the tax dollars from going to Washington, to help for healthcare access in states like New York and California. We want to keep those tax dollars here in South Dakota to invest in our healthcare and local economy and Amendment D would do just that,” said Benson.

So why is the American Cancer Society advocating for the expansion of Medicaid?

According to Benson, thousands of South Dakotans are diagnosed with cancer every year, “and having access to healthcare and routine screenings can make the difference between a stage 1 diagnosis or a stage 4 cancer diagnosis. So, what we know from studies, the American Cancer Society has a study that shows newly diagnosed cancer patients have a better survival rate if they live in a state that has expanded Medicaid,” explained Benson.

South Dakota voters have the opportunity to vote on Amendment D this November.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.blackhillsfox.com/2022/09/14/new-poll-shows-south-dakota-voters-are-leaning-toward-expanding-medicaid/

Posted on

Clawback: Feds say NYC Improperly Billed Medicaid for $84.3M

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: A recent audit of NEMT payments has led federal officials to ask for $84M back from NY.

 
 

OIG auditors were unable to determine if an additional $112 million in non-emergency medical transportation claims complied with state and federal requirements.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

The audit examined 4,768,858 payments totaling $269,584,249 (federal share) for NEMT services in 2018 and 2019.

Inspectors found that only 17 of the 100 payments picked in a random sampling complied with state and federal requirements.

Forty-one samples did not comply and auditors could not determine compliance for the remaining 42 samples.

New York officials asked auditors to withdraw the refund request and provide additional documentation for 28 sampled payments.

Federal auditors say New York City should refund $84.3 million to Medicaid after inspectors uncovered widespread noncompliance and sloppy documentation in claims for non-emergency medical transportation.

The audit by the Department of Health and Human Services — Office of the Inspector General also was unable to determine if an additional $112 million in federal funding for NEMT providers complied with state and federal regulations.

The audit examined 4,768,858 payments totaling $269,584,249 (federal share) for NEMT services in 2018 and 2019. Inspectors found that only 17 of the 100 payments picked in a random sampling complied with state and federal requirements. Forty-one samples did not comply and auditors could not determine compliance for the remaining 42 samples.

“On the basis of our sample results, we estimated that New York improperly claimed at least $84,329,893 in Federal Medicaid reimbursement for payments to NEMT providers that did not comply with certain Federal and State requirements,” OIG says. “In addition, we estimated that New York claimed $112,028,279 in Federal Medicaid reimbursement for payments to NEMT providers that may not have complied with certain Federal and State requirements.

Get the latest on healthcare leadership in your inbox.

The auditors recommend that New York City refund $84,329,893 to the federal government for the noncompliant payments and further audit the $112,028,279 in questionable payments and refund any money that was inappropriately billed.  

In a written response to the audit, New York Department of Health Acting Executive Deputy Commissioner Kristen M. Proud did not comment on the specific recommendations but asked auditors to withdraw the refund request and provide additional documentation for 28 sampled payments.

“Because of the enormous number of people transitioning transportation managers, and the state’s moral obligation to ensure that there would be no interruptions in the delivery of medical services, the department directed the new transportation managers to accept the level of transportation previously established for each enrollee,” Proud says in a letter to HHS Regional Inspector General Brenda Tierney.

“Neither State statute nor regulation defines a specific period of time for which the written order specifying the appropriate mode is valid,” Proud writes. “Based on the foregoing information and the details below, the Department requests that the repayment request be withdrawn from the audit report.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/revenue-cycle/clawback-feds-say-nyc-improperly-billed-medicaid-843m

Posted on

TennCare: Update may have disclosed personal information of Medicaid recipients

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: People in one family may have been able to see data about 1 other family. And some of them are related.

 
 

 
 

 
 

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WTVF) — Personal information for about 1,700 Medicaid recipients in Tennessee may have been disclosed during an update to a computer system, officials said.

The update may have led to a limited number of people from one household to be able to view some information about individuals in another household that included some of the same people, a statement from TennCare said. The breach happened when a new application listed the name of a person who was already in another household, the statement said.

TennCare quickly determined the scope of the breach, addressed the issue and notified those impacted.

There’s no indication that any information was misused, but the agency is offering 12 months of free identity theft protection services to those affected as a precaution.

TennCare provides health care insurance to 1.7 million Tennesseans.

Clipped from: https://www.newschannel5.com/news/personal-information-for-about-1-700-medicaid-recipients-in-tennessee-may-have-been-disclosed