Posted on

STATE NEWS (TX)- ADA Admits Report Comparing State Medicaid Reimbursement Rates with Private Insurance Is Flawed

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: We would like a new set of numbers to better help support our ask for more money, please.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.tdmr.org/ada-report-comparing-state-medicaid-reimbursement-rates-with-private-insurance-is-flawed/

 
 

On June 27, we reported that the Legislature would not be increasing the Medicaid fee schedule for dentists despite the overwhelming need and the record abundance of funds in the state coffers this legislative session.

The reason cited was that Texas HHS (HHSC) would not agree to such an increase because Texas was still paying a higher reimbursement rate than some other states.

The only research we could find on this was a 2020 ADA Health Policy Institute report entitled “Reimbursement Rates for Child and Adult Dental Services in Medicaid by State” which showed this and is included as a PDF in that article.

Success raising rates in other states

A few days after publishing the article, TDMR was contacted by a source in the dental insurance industry who was involved in efforts in other states outside of Texas to raise dental reimbursement rates. There has been success in doing so in a number of states including Louisiana, Georgia, and Kansas over the last year (see below).

They were interested in what happened in Texas.

Complaints on accuracy of ADA report

When the ADA report was mentioned, they said dentists in other states had complained to the ADA about the accuracy of the report because there was no way Kentucky was paying Medicaid dentists almost 105% of private insurance rates.

Because of the complaints, we were told that Marko Vujicic, the chief economist and vice president of the ADA’s Health Policy Institute, admitted the report wasn’t fully accurate.

HPI chief economist admits complaints valid

To back this up, there was an email written on June 28, the day after the publishing of our article, by Dr. Vujicic PHD and circulating around with his permission.

We were forwarded a copy and reproduce the relevant text here:

Re: KY, look, we are pretty open about our shortcomings with MCO data and also transparent on what we compare Medicaid rates to. The data are not perfect, each update we try to do better and rest assured, we are about to get new data in the coming weeks and will address some of the methodology challenges. Do I wish this happened quicker, yes, but we are at the mercy of outside data agencies too. We are not going to get MCO Medicaid data, it is just going to be the FFS Medicaid rates. Again, that is all the data we have. I would love it if MCOs had to disclose their data but they don’t. We will be using dentist charges this go around in the denominator, as that will be a better comparison vs. paid amounts. And I assure you we will look to make things even clearer in the write up.

Feel free to pass this along. I appreciate the feedback, we are not ignoring it, trust me.

Did the ADA’s petard hoist us here in Texas? We simply don’t know.  We don’t have all the rates to compare ourselves and determine their accuracy.  But clearly, an ADA report has authority and we would hope it to be accurate.

Medicaid Gains in Other States

Posted on

STATE NEWS (OR)- Oregon expands free health insurance for low-income residents – regardless of immigration status

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Also not Medicaid. Also 100% state funded. But this journo does a good job of pointing this out.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2023/07/06/oregon-expands-free-health-insurance-for-low-income-oregonians-regardless-of-immigration-status/

The move coincides with debates in other states this year on expanding Medicaid coverage to undocumented immigrants

 
 

Oregon has a program for undocumented immigrants that mirrors Medicaid. (Getty Images)

UPDATED at 6:05 p.m. with more information from the Oregon Health Authority.

Oregon has expanded free health insurance that mirrors Medicaid to all residents who qualify, regardless of their immigration status. 

The move took effect July 1. It marks an expansion of a Medicaid-type program for immigrants last year for residents who don’t qualify for the Oregon Health Plan because of their immigration status. The program, Healthier Oregon, covered those 19-24 and 55 and older who met low-income and other qualifications and was funded by a $100 million allocation by the Legislature in 2021.

The expansion this month to all immigrants who qualify follows a two-year allocation of $460 million for the program in the recently ended legislative session. The Oregon Health Authority said that 40,000 immigrants who had received state-funded emergency health coverage were switched to the program on July 1. 

An authority spokeswoman, Amy Bacher, said the agency estimates that 55,000 people will be covered through the program.

“When it comes to health, we’re all connected,” Dave Baden, interim director of Oregon Health Authority, said in a statement. “Expanded health coverage through the full implementation of Healthier Oregon will keep more people and families healthy, which will reduce health costs and risks for every community.”

Baden said the expansion sets a new standard for other states. It comes amid a debate this spring in some states, including Connecticut, Minnesota and Nevada, about expanding Medicaid to undocumented immigrants, Politico reported. Similar efforts in New York and Maryland failed, however, with Democrats balking about the price tag.

Medicaid is funded largely through the federal government, which pays about two-thirds, with the rest provided by the state. Healthier Oregon receives some federal funding for emergency and pregnancy-related services but the state pays for most of the benefits.

“We don’t get any help from the federal government because the folks who are on it don’t have papers,” Rep. Rob Nosse, D-Portland, told the Capital Chronicle. 

Nosse was among the Democrats in the Legislature who backed the expansion of Healthier Oregon. It’s part of the state’s goal to ensure all Oregonians have health care coverage. 

During the pandemic, nearly 1.5 million Oregonians, or one in three residents, were on Medicaid, which offers free dental, mental and physical health care. That expansion ended in April. The state is now going through a redetermination process and informing those who no longer qualify that they will lose coverage in 60 days.

State officials have informed about 25,000 people they will lose coverage, according to a statement released by the Oregon Health Authority and the Department of Human Services on June 20. It estimated in that release that seven in 10 people will retain their benefits under the Oregon Health Plan, the state’s version of Medicaid.

To qualify for the program, most residents can earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level, or about $20,000 a year for an individual or about $41,500 for a family of four. Oregon also has opened up benefits to those earning up to 200% of the federal poverty level to reduce the so-called churn population who fall off and on Medicaid, depending on their income. That means that individuals earning up to about $29,000 a year or a family of four earning up to $60,000 a year will receive the free coverage. The state estimated that would add about 25,000 more people to the Medicaid program. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Posted on

STATE NEWS (MD)- Maryland Medicaid expands benefits to include community violence prevention, pregnancy care for non-U.S. citizens

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: It ain’t Medicaid. Its 100pct funded by the state.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-hs-maryland-medicaid-expansion-20230705-d2gcmu27tvhu7m4nwxrhiyq2iu-story.html

Maryland Medicaid will start paying for some community violence prevention services, peer recovery support services in certain settings, and pregnancy and postpartum care for people whether or not they’re a U.S. citizen under benefits expansions announced earlier this week.

“These new benefits will help improve the well-being of Maryland Medicaid participants and contribute to the overall health of Maryland communities,” Gov. Wes Moore said in a news release announcing the expansion. “The new benefits mark a significant milestone in Medicaid’s ongoing efforts to ensure accessible and inclusive health care for all Marylanders.”

One part of the expansion, the Healthy Babies initiative, launched Saturday. It aims to reduce the number of maternal deaths in the state, according to the news release.

The program provides health care to people who are pregnant or have recently given birth, live in Maryland, and meet specific income requirements, regardless of whether they are U.S. citizens. If eligible, non-citizens who otherwise meet the requirements will receive the same Medicaid benefits available to other pregnant people, including physical and behavioral health services and dental and prescription drug coverage without copays.

Maryland Medicaid also will cover four months of postpartum care for people eligible for the program. The plan may help pay for pregnancy and postpartum care the patient received three months before they applied to the program.

As of Saturday, Maryland Medicaid also will provide reimbursement for some community violence prevention services, including mentorship, conflict mediation, crisis intervention, referrals to licensed health care professionals or social services providers, patient education and screening services for victims of violence.

Certified peer recovery specialists who work at Federally Qualified Health Centers, opioid treatment programs or community-based substance use disorder programs licensed by the Behavioral Health Administration also may be reimbursed by Medicaid for their services.

“These expanded benefits will work to improve population health, providing individuals with enhanced access to vital health care services and support,” said Ryan Moran, the state’s deputy secretary of health care financing and Medicaid director, in the release. “We encourage Marylanders to reach out and take advantage of these services.”

Posted on

STATE NEWS (NC)- Medicaid tailored plans delayed again by state

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Wonders never cease.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2023/07/12/state-officials-delay-the-rollout-of-specialty-medicaid-plans-again/

 
 

The repeatedly delayed rollout of specialized health care plans for tens of thousands of Medicaid beneficiaries — those with complex, often behavioral health needs — has been postponed indefinitely, the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services announced Tuesday

This marks the third time the state has pushed back the launch of so-called tailored plans for individuals who require more extensive care and support than average Medicaid enrollees. Some of the groups expected to eventually transition to tailored plans include people with intellectual or developmental disabilities, people with substance use disorders and traumatic brain injuries, low-income seniors living in nursing homes and many people with severe mental health issues.

DHHS originally said these groups would be moved to tailored plans in December 2022 before delaying the launch to this April and then again to October. In a news release announcing the latest postponement, the agency said it is “not able to announce a certain go-forward date at this time.”

“The Department has been working collaboratively with the legislature to achieve the necessary tools to administer the Tailored Plans on par with other managed care plans, but they are still a work in progress,” the release said. “Further, uncertainty with the state budget, which will fund transformation costs and rebase for the Medicaid program, creates additional needs for launching Tailored Plans.”

Another issue, the agency suggested, is a lack of readiness among the six behavioral health organizations that will coordinate care for tailored plan enrollees across the state. Those state-supported managed care agencies, known as LME-MCOs, are Alliance Health, Eastpointe, Partners Health Management, Sandhills Center, Trillium Health Resources and Vaya Health. The departmental statement said “progress has been made” in ensuring that those organizations have the “technical capabilities” needed to implement the tailored plans. 

The LME-MCOs  are meant to act as intermediaries, connecting eligible enrollees with health care providers who will be reimbursed through tailored-plan contracts. But some providers have been reluctant to accept this arrangement, making it difficult for the organizations, all of which serve multiple counties, to ensure that eligible beneficiaries have access to care where they live.

‘Continued gaps’

In its announcement on Tuesday, DHHS acknowledged that “gaps remain in provider networks” — echoing comments made by Jay Ludlum, deputy secretary for N.C. Medicaid, during a June 14 symposium in Raleigh organized by the i2i Center for Integrative Health

There are continued gaps in contracting,” he said at the time. “We are seeing that it’s primarily around one system that is not contracting, and I’m not going to mention them by name. We are trying to encourage them to engage in that contracting. I think that that’s really important.”

 
 

Jay Ludlam, deputy secretary of Medicaid for N.C. DHHS, speaks at the Hilton Raleigh North Hills hotel on June 14, 2023. Credit: Jaymie Baxley/NC Health News

While Ludlum did not identify the holdout, Rhett Melton, CEO of Partners Health Management, in March said his organization was having difficulty contracting with Atrium Health. The Charlotte-based provider, which is the country’s eighth-largest hospital system, has about 2,700 acute care beds in North Carolina, nearly 150 of which are for patients with mental health needs.

“Atrium has the health care market, if you will, for us in [our region],” Melton said during a meeting of the Joint House and Senate Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services. “When we don’t have the contract with Atrium, that displaces about 25 percent of our members.”

Atrium, in turn, appeared to take a swipe at the behavioral health organizations in a statement to NC Health News, referencing the ongoing capability challenges described by DHHS.

“Our intent is to be contracted with each of the payors in this space to support this vulnerable patient population and its growing needs,” a spokesperson for the system said in an email Tuesday. “As the state has noted publicly, there are gaps in the technological capabilities and operational readiness of the tailored plans. We look forward to being able to move forward when the department and the plans have resolved these issues.”

‘Key issues outstanding’

Tailored plans have been a work in progress ever since North Carolina switched to a managed-care Medicaid system in 2021. While managed care is not unique to the state, North Carolina’s system differs from the traditional model by including plans tailored to the needs of some of the state’s most expensive patients, many of whom have complicated — often multiple — diagnoses, and who need a lot of support. 

DHHS has said about 150,000 people, or 5 percent of the state’s Medicaid participants, are expected to move to tailored plans when the plans eventually go live, but it is not yet clear if that can happen without Atrium’s participation. It also remains to be seen when the behavioral health organizations will be fully prepared for the plans’ rollout.

Anthony Ward, CEO of Sandhills Center, said his organization “values the integrated, whole-person approach included in the Tailored Plan design.” 

“We are committed to continuing our work with the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services on our preparation for the Tailored Plan launch when announced,” he said in an email to NC Health News. “We share NC DHHS’ focus on minimizing disruption for the members served by the Tailored Plans and have been working actively with community providers currently serving our members, including Primary Care Physicians, to contract with us in advance of the Tailored Plan launch.”

State health and human services Secretary Kody Kinsley echoed Ward’s comments in texts to NC Health News. 

“Our team has worked very hard on this, and we believe in the whole-person vision that is core to the design of the tailored plans,” he said. “However, as I said before the joint oversight committee in March, we have key issues outstanding we need resolved.”

Legislation passed in March made North Carolina the 40th state to expand access to Medicaid. The expansion, which will not officially take effect until a state budget is approved, will provide coverage to about 600,000 people who currently lack health insurance. At the same time, an estimated 300,000 existing beneficiaries are expected to lose coverage through the unwinding of a federal mandate that prevented states from kicking people off the rolls during the COVID-19 pandemic. DHHS has confirmed that many of these individuals will become eligible for Medicaid again under expansion, once that takes effect.

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Posted on

FWA (VA)- Chester woman sentenced by DOJ for Medicaid, healthcare fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Sharon Johnson operated a fraudulent group home, stole resident pension funds and billed for deceased residents for 8 months before reporting them dead. You paid for every penny of this with your W-2s.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.wric.com/news/local-news/chesterfield-county/chester-woman-sentenced-for-medicaid-healthcare-fraud/

 
 

A photo of a Medicaid form. (Photo: MGN)

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, Va. — A Chester woman was sentenced on Thursday, July 7 for several charges relating to healthcare fraud.

58-year-old Sharon Johnson has been sentenced to 51 months in prison for the conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, healthcare fraud and wire fraud, according to the the U.S. Department of Justice .

These charges center around Johnson’s owning and operating of an unlicensed group home under “Sharon Y. Johnson & Associates” (SYJA) for seven years.

This organization claimed to provide personal and home healthcare services, allowing those on Medicaid to remain in-home rather than enter a nursing or group home. All of these services were paid for by the individuals’ Medicaid eligibility.

The unlicensed facility was located within her own home in Chester — a three bedroom home that the DOJ reports regularly housed up to a half-dozen residents.

According to the DOJ, Johnson would bill Medicaid for services she did not provide her patients. She would also submit documents to the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) to allow her access to their pensions.

PREVIOUS: Chester woman received Medicaid, pension payments from unlicensed group home patients in fraud scheme

Furthermore, the DOJ reports that Johnson fraudulently collected a now-deceased patient’s VRS pension payments for at least 8 months after her death before she eventually reported the death. She did this by obtaining “Medical Power of Attorney” over the resident.

Johnson pleaded guilty to these charges in December 2022, and was originally meant to be sentenced in April of this year.

More information on this case can be found on wric.com the Department of Justice’s website.

Posted on

FWA (VA)- Health Connect America Gets Fined $4.6M for Wrongful Billing of Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Health Connect stole $4.6M from your W-2. They did not say thank you. But they do promise to do better. Pinky swear, even. (bogus mental health services claims in multiple states)

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://medcitynews.com/2023/07/mental-health-children-fined-medicaid-improper-billing/

Health Connect America, a mental health company, improperly billed Virginia Medicaid for three different behavioral health services for children, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Western District of Virginia.

 
 

Mental health company Health Connect America will pay more than $4.6 million “to resolve allegations that it billed Virginia Medicaid for services not provided,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Western District of Virginia announced Friday.

Franklin, Tennessee-based Health Connect America
offers mental and behavioral health services to youth, individuals and families. It supports patients battling grief, anger management, family issues and substance use disorder. Health Connect America currently serves patients in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee and Virginia.

Health Connect America allegedly improperly billed Medicaid for three different behavioral health services for children, according to the Attorney’s Office. The first is called Therapeutic Day Treatment, which is a school-based program for kids with a variety of mental health conditions. The mental health company billed Virginia Medicaid for services to students who were absent, as well as during holidays and weather closures.

Another program it improperly billed Virginia Medicaid for is called Intensive In-home Services, a home-based mental health program for children who are “at risk of being removed from their home,” according to the Attorney’s Office. However, Health Connect America allegedly billed Virginia Medicaid for services by an employee who was engaged in a sexual relationship with a minor in Orange County, Virginia. The employee is currently serving a 10-year sentence.

Lastly, the company wrongly billed Virginia Medicaid for Behavioral Therapy Services, a specialized mental health treatment for kids with conditions like autism. Behavioral Therapy Services are required to be provided by specially-trained mental health professionals. However, Health Connect America billed for Behavioral Health Services by providers who were not “properly trained or credentialed” in Southwest Virginia.

The company also “used the name and National Provider Identifier (NPI) number of a properly-trained and credentialed mental health professional located in Northern Virginia who had never seen clients in Southwest Virginia,” the Attorney’s Office said.

Promoted

 
 

PE Investments, Acquisitions Fuel New Stages of Growth for Healthcare and Life Science Companies


In an interview, Nathan Ray, a partner with the healthcare and life practice who oversees M&A/PE related work in that industry for West Monroe, highlighted how his firm works with companies to drive due diligence for clients, and help acquired companies address issues and differentiate during holds.

Stephanie Baum

“Health care providers have a responsibility to submit accurate and honest claims to federal health care programs to ensure that these resources are available for eligible patients,” said Maureen Dixon, special agent in charge at the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), in a news release. “HHS-OIG is committed to safeguarding valuable taxpayer dollars and protecting the integrity of the Medicaid program.”

Health Connect America has agreed to five years of additional oversight and compliance. Compliance measures include unannounced audits and additional reporting requirements if there are situations of theft, fraud, abuse or neglect.

Not complying could lead to “criminal prosecution and contempt of court proceedings that could result in additional monetary sanctions and injunctive relief,” the Attorney’s Office stated.

Health Connect America did not return a request for comment.

Photo credit: Waldemarus, Getty Images

Posted on

PHE (MCOs)- Molina, Elevance Health Medicaid membership grew by over 50% during continuous enrollment

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Follow the money. Then listen to the chicken littles, who don’t realize they are unwitting mouth pieces of the Titans.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/molina-elevance-health-medicaid-membership-grew-by-over-50-during-continuous-enrollment.html

Molina Healthcare had the largest gains in Medicaid enrollment during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a report from KFF published July 6. 

Elevance Health’s Medicaid membership also grew by over 50 percent during continuous coverage requirements, according to the report. 

More than 1 million people have been disenrolled from state Medicaid programs since April, when states were allowed to begin removing ineligible members for the first time since continuous coverage requirements were put in place in 2020. 

Among five major Medicaid managed care companies — Molina Healthcare, Elevance Health, Centene, UnitedHealthcare and CVS Health — Medicaid enrollment increased by 44.1 percent from 2020 to 2023. 

In investor calls, payer executives have said the companies are working to transition Medicaid members who lose coverage to ACA plans and other forms of coverage. 

Here’s how much five major payers’ Medicaid enrollment increased during the pandemic: 

  1. Molina Healthcare: 62.8 percent increase
  2. Elevance Health: 56.1 percent increase
  3. UnitedHealth: 42.5 percent increase 
  4. Centene: 38 percent increase
  5. CVS Health: 17.1 percent increase 

Subscribe to the following topics: molina healthcareelevance healthunitedhealthcentenecvs health

Posted on

TECH- Medicaid security breach affects over 2,600 Arizonans, agency says

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: “Passw0rd”

 
 

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.azfamily.com/2023/06/30/medicaid-security-breach-affects-over-2600-arizonans-agency-says/

 
 

The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System says 2,632 people are affected by the breach.(MGN)

PHOENIX (3TV/CBS 5) — Over 2,600 Arizona Medicaid recipients may have had their personal information stolen after a breach that happened mid-May.

The state’s Medicaid agency, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), said in a statement that it is “aware of a breach of personal information on May 11, 2023 affecting 2,632 individuals in Arizona who are enrolled Medicaid members.” The vulnerability would have allowed bad actors to see sensitive details, including first and last names, addresses and the last four digits of Social Security numbers through the Health-e-Arizona Plus website. Upon learning of the error, the HEAplus system toolbar was turned off.

AHCCCS assures that this type of breach would not happen again, the agency said in the statement, and that starting July 3, it will start to notify those affected by the breach. The agency will send out the notifications through the mail.

If you learn that you’re affected by the breach, you can contact one of the three credit reporting agencies to report a fraud alert, which lets the agencies know that any new requests for credit may be fraudulent. You can also ask the agencies for a security freeze that stops agencies from releasing your information without your express permission (you’ll have to do this using certified mail notifying all three agencies).

Consumers are entitled to one free credit report from each of the three agencies: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. You can learn more at www.annualcreditreport.com or call 1-877-322-8228.

Credit Reporting Agency contact information:

Equifax, 1-888-378-4329 or www.equifax.com/personal or mail to P.O. Box 740241, Atlanta, GA 30374-0241

Experian, 1-888-EXPERIAN (397-3742) or www.experian.com or mail to P.O. Box 9532, Allen, TX, 75013

TransUnion, 1-800-916-8800 or www.transunion.com/annual-credit-report or mail to Fraud Victim Assistance Division, P.O. Box 6790, Fullerton, CA 92834-6790

Other resources:

Report any suspected identity theft to local police and inform AHCCCS of any filed police reports.

Identity Theft Resource Center | www.idtheftcenter.org

1-888-400-5530 (not a toll-free number). Information is available in English and Spanish.

Federal Trade Commission |
www.consumer.ftc.gov/features

1-877-ID-THEFT (1-877-438-4338). Information is available in English and Spanish.

Arizona Attorney General’s Office

For more, www.azag.gov/consumer provides tips on how to guard against identity theft and the misuse of personal information (select Identity Theft from Quick Links menu at top of home page). You may also call 602-542-5025 (Phoenix); 520-628-6504 (Tucson); or toll-free 1-866-742-4911 (outside Maricopa and Pima Counties).

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Posted on

RX- Antipsychotic Medication Use In Medicaid-Insured Children Decreased Substantially Between 2008 And 2016

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Celebrating that now only 55% of Medicaid kids getting a powerful antipsychotic med are missing a relevant diagnosis to validate they need it or suggest are getting their care managed.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01625

Abstract

After the rapid growth of pediatric antipsychotic prescribing in the early 2000s, especially in the Medicaid population, concerns regarding the safety and appropriateness of such prescribing increased. Many states implemented policy and educational initiatives aimed at safer and more judicious antipsychotic use. Antipsychotic use leveled off in the late 2000s, but there have been no recent national estimates of trends in antipsychotic use in children enrolled in Medicaid, and it is unclear how use varied by race and ethnicity. This study observed a sizable decline in antipsychotic use among children ages 2–17 between 2008 and 2016. Although the magnitude of change varied, declines were observed across foster care status, age, sex, and racial and ethnic groups studied. The proportion of children with an antipsychotic prescription who received any diagnosis associated with a pediatric indication that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration increased from 38 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2016, which may indicate a trend toward more judicious prescribing.

TOPICS

 
 

  •  

 
 

  • 1 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicaid Integrity Group. Atypical antipsychotic medications: use in pediatric patients [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2015 Oct [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-medicaid-coordination/fraud-prevention/medicaid-integrity-education/pharmacy-education-materials/downloads/atyp-antipsych-pediatric-factsheet11-14.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 2 Galling B, Roldán A, Nielsen RE, Nielsen J, Gerhard T, Carbon Met al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth exposed to antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(3):247–59. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ray WA, Stein CM, Murray KT, Fuchs DC, Patrick SW, Daugherty Jet al. Association of antipsychotic treatment with risk of unexpected death among children and youths. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(2):162–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Libowitz MR, Nurmi EL. The burden of antipsychotic-induced weight gain and metabolic syndrome in children. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:623681. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jensen KG, Correll CU, Rudå D, Klauber DG, Decara MS, Fagerlund Bet al. Cardiometabolic adverse effects and its predictors in children and adolescents with first-episode psychosis during treatment with quetiapine-extended release versus aripiprazole: 12-week results from the Tolerance and Effect of Antipsychotics in Children and Adolescents with Psychosis (TEA) Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58(11):1062–78. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Crystal S, Mackie T, Fenton MC, Amin S, Neese-Todd S, Olfson Met al. Rapid growth of antipsychotic prescriptions for children who are publicly insured has ceased, but concerns remain. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):974–82. Go to the articleGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Patten SB, Waheed W, Bresee L. A review of pharmacoepidemiologic studies of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57(12):717–21. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Crystal S, Olfson M, Huang C, Pincus H, Gerhard T. Broadened use of atypical antipsychotics: safety, effectiveness, and policy challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):w770–81. Go to the articleGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mackie TI, Hyde J, Palinkas LA, Niemi E, Leslie LK. Fostering psychotropic medication oversight for children in foster care: a national examination of states’ monitoring mechanisms. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017;44(2):243–57. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Spence O, Reeves G, dosReis S. Spillover effects of state Medicaid antipsychotic prior authorization policies in US commercially insured youth. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(9):1064–71. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bushnell GA, Crystal S, Olfson M. Trends in antipsychotic medication use in young privately insured children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;60(7):877–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Edelsohn GA, Karpov I, Parthasarathy M, Hutchison SL, Castelnovo K, Ghuman Jet al. Trends in antipsychotic prescribing in Medicaid-eligible youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(1):59–66. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nunes JC, Naccarato T, Stafford RS. Antipsychotics in the California foster care system: a 10-year analysis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2022;32(7):400–7. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cataife G, Weinberg DA. Racial and ethnic differences in antipsychotic medication use among children enrolled in Medicaid. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(9):946–51. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 To access the appendix, click on the Details tab of the article online.
  • 16 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. DQ Atlas [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov/dq-atlas/welcome
    Google Scholar

  • 17 Nguyen JK, Sanghavi P. A national assessment of legacy versus new generation Medicaid data. Health Serv Res. 2022;57(4):944–56. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Schmid I, Burcu M, Zito JM. Medicaid prior authorization policies for pediatric use of antipsychotic medications. JAMA. 2015;313(9):966–8. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zito JM, Burcu M, McKean S, Warnock R, Kelman J. Pediatric use of antipsychotic medications before and after Medicaid peer review implementation. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(1):100–3. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Foti ME, Harper G, Moon R, Oestreich G, Snow R, Thompson Jet al. Antipsychotic medication use in Medicaid children and adolescents: report and resource guide from a 16-state study [Internet]. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers Center for Education and Research on Mental Health Therapeutics; 2010 Jun [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://ifh.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/MMDLN-Rutgers-AP_MED_USE_IN_CHILDREN…en_Report_and_Resource_Guide_Final.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 21 National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS measures for the safe & judicious use of antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents [Internet]. Washington (DC): NCQA; [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/reports-and-research/national-collaborative-for-innovation-in-quality-measurement/hedis-measures-for-the-safe-judicious-use-of-antipsychotic-medications-in-children-and-adolescents/
    Google Scholar

  • 22 Department of Health and Human Services. 2015 annual report on the quality of care for children in Medicaid and CHIP [Internet]. Washington (DC): HHS; 2016 Feb [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/quality-of-care/downloads/2015-child-sec-rept.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 23 Akincigil A, Mackie TI, Cook S, Hilt RJ, Crystal S. Effectiveness of mandatory peer review to reduce antipsychotic prescriptions for Medicaid-insured children. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(4):596–603. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mackie TI, Cook S, Crystal S, Olfson M, Akincigil A. Antipsychotic use among youth in foster care enrolled in a specialized managed care organization intervention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(1):166–176.e3. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Finnerty M, Neese-Todd S, Bilder S, Olfson M, Crystal S. Best practices: MEDNET: a multistate policy maker–researcher collaboration to improve prescribing practices. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(11):1297–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Findling RL, Drury SS, Jensen PS, Rapoport JL, Bukstein OG, Walter HJet al. Practice parameter for the use of atypical antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents [Internet]. Washington (DC): American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; c 2011 [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/practice_parameters/Atypical_Antipsychotic_Medications_Web.pdf
    Google Scholar

  • 27 Scotto Rosato N, Correll CU, Pappadopulos E, Chait A, Crystal S, Jensen PSet al. Treatment of maladaptive aggression in youth: CERT guidelines II. Treatments and ongoing management. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1577–86. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Penfold RB, Thompson EE, Hilt RJ, Kelleher KJ, Schwartz N, Beck Aet al. Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY) pragmatic trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;99:106184. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Stroup TS, Gerhard T, Crystal S, Huang C, Olfson M. Comparative effectiveness of clozapine and standard antipsychotic treatment in adults with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(2):166–73. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Olfson M, Gerhard T, Huang C, Lieberman JA, Bobo WV, Crystal S. Comparative effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotic medications in early-onset schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(4):845–53. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management [Internet]. London: NICE; 2013 Jan 23 [last updated 2016 Oct 26; cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg155
    Google Scholar

  • 32 Morrison AP, Pyle M, Maughan D, Johns L, Freeman D, Broome MRet al. Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(9):788–800. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cook BL, Carson NJ, Kafali EN, Valentine A, Rueda JD, Coe-Odess Set al. Examining psychotropic medication use among youth in the U.S. by race/ethnicity and psychological impairment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017;45:32–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Heun-Johnson H, Menchine M, Axeen S, Lung K, Claudius I, Wright Tet al. Association between race/ethnicity and disparities in health care use before first-episode psychosis among privately insured young patients. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(3):311–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(21):2458–63. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 DeLuca JS, Novacek DM, Adery LH, Herrera SN, Landa Y, Corcoran CMet al. Equity in mental health services for youth at clinical high risk for psychosis: considering marginalized identities and stressors. Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022;7(2):176–97. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Vanderwerker L, Akincigil A, Olfson M, Gerhard T, Neese-Todd S, Crystal S. Foster care, externalizing disorders, and antipsychotic use among Medicaid-enrolled youths. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(10):1281–4. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tan C, Greiner MV, Nause K, Shahabuddin Z, Beal SJ. Mental health diagnoses, health care utilization, and placement stability on antipsychotic prescribing among foster care youth. Acad Pediatr. 2023;23(3):675–80. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Dosreis S, Yoon Y, Rubin DM, Riddle MA, Noll E, Rothbard A. Antipsychotic treatment among youth in foster care. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1459–66. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Leckman-Westin E, Finnerty M, Scholle SH, Pritam R, Layman D, Kealey Eet al. Differences in Medicaid antipsychotic medication measures among children with SSI, foster care, and income-based aid. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(3):238–46. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lohr WD, Jawad K, Feygin Y, Le J, Creel L, Pasquenza Net al. Antipsychotic medications for low-income preschoolers: long duration and psychotropic medication polypharmacy. Psychiatr Serv. 2022;73(5):510–7. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Olfson M, King M, Schoenbaum M. Treatment of young people with antipsychotic medications in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(9):867–74. Google Scholar
  • 43 Patel H, Barnes J, Osazuwa-Peters N, Bierut LJ. Association of state Medicaid expansion status with rates of suicide among US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2217228. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Sommers BD, Blendon RJ, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Changes in utilization and health among low-income adults after Medicaid expansion or expanded private insurance. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1501–9. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
Posted on

STATE NEWS (NH)- Adults on Medicaid now have dental benefits. Many can’t get appointments.

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: But muh’ network adequacy numbers said I was good! (translation – a pile of LOIs does not a usable network make).

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://newhampshirebulletin.com/2023/07/05/adults-on-medicaid-now-have-dental-benefits-many-cant-get-appointments/

 
 

Less 15 percent of the state’s dentists have agreed to treat adult Medicaid patients as part of the state’s new New Hampshire Smiles Program. Many are not seeing them, however, due to staff shortages and low Medicaid rates. (Getty Images)

Three months after the state agreed to cover basic dental care for adults on Medicaid, less than 15 percent of the state’s 850 dentists and oral surgeons have signed on. And fewer are actually taking patients.

Almost half of those 125 providers in the state’s new New Hampshire Smiles Program have set limits on their participation. Some will take only five patients, and others want more time before taking any. 

Some dental practices are scheduling new patients for as early as August, but others have no openings for months or even years; a North Country practice doesn’t expect to be able to accept new patients, even those with commercial insurance, until 2025. 

In interviews with the Bulletin, providers cited staff shortages of dentists, hygienists, and dental assistants, and Medicaid reimbursement rates that cover just half the cost of many procedures. A myriad of efforts to recruit more dental practitioners to the state has promise, advocates say, but won’t bring a quick fix.

For now, that makes the math unfavorable for the 21,000 adults on Medicaid who the state expects to take advantage of the new program in the first year. Previously, New Hampshire was one of about 10 states that gave adults with Medicaid coverage for only emergencies, such as tooth extraction, but not regular preventative care like cleanings, x-rays, and exams. 

Cari Young, a program manager at Aspire Learning and Living, which serves people with disabilities, said a Concord practice offered her appointments in 2025 for her four clients. When Young said she’d take them, the receptionist put her on hold and never returned to the phone. Other practices have not returned her messages.

“It’s frustrating,” Young said. “They all deserve to have their teeth cleaned at least, even if they don’t have any dental work.”

State officials and oral advocates acknowledged the frustration of people like Young who’ve been unable to find care for their clients. But they are calling the first three months of the program a success.

 
 

Dr. Sarah Finne

The state is seeing an increasing number of claims submitted for reimbursement, from 1,000 in April to 2,000 in June, said Dr. Sarah Finne, dental director for the Department of Health and Human Services. That number does not reflect the number of patients seen, she said, because one patient may have multiple procedures.

Recruiting 125 providers this early in the program is also a success, said Finne and other advocates who’ve worked years to get adults on Medicaid dental coverage.  

Providers may be hesitant knowing they will lose money with low Medicaid rates. Some fear that Medicaid patients’ sometimes transient and complicated lives will lead them to miss precious few openings. And because adult Medicaid patients have never had coverage for preventative care, they are expected to have more acute conditions, such as abscesses, infections, and gum disease, which is why the recruitment of oral surgeons has been a focus.

“This (participation rate) is actually encouraging to me because initially, we weren’t sure they were going to go into it,” said Gail Brown, director of the New Hampshire Oral Health Coalition, which lobbied lawmakers for years to approve the program. “We were concerned they would say, ‘This isn’t for me,’ and go on with life as it is because, especially for the traditional private offices, they’re running their businesses.” 

 
 

Carrie Duran, a single mom from Wolfeboro, has lobbied lawmakers to support paid family leave and preventative dental care for adults with Medicaid. She is eligible for that care but cannot find a dentist in her area offering appointments. (Courtesy of MomsRising)

Carrie Duran, a single mother who has Medicaid, was there when Gov. Chris Sununu signed the dental benefit bill after lobbying for the legislation. Duran then visited dental practices with information about the program to encourage them to participate. 

But she’s been unable to get care for herself.

“I live in Wolfeboro, where dentists are more expensive,” Duran said. “They’re great. I’ve heard nothing but wonderful things about the dentists in our area. But none of them take Medicaid.” 

The directory of providers who’ve joined the New Hampshire Smiles Program lists two practices within 25 miles of Wolfeboro. Neither are taking new Medicaid patients. The next nearest provider is in Bristol, nearly 45 miles away. 

“I’m just sort of waiting until it becomes catastrophic,” Duran said. 

‘We don’t want people to go under’

Anticipating providers’ concerns about treating Medicaid patients, the state and Northeast Delta Dental, which won the $33.5 million contract to manage the program for the state, included two key services and financial incentives.

The contract provides eligible patients free transportation to and from appointments. And the program pays for care managers who help patients sort out the barriers causing them to miss appointments. 

“Both of those items are important because they help really give (Medicaid members) the support they need,” said Finne. “And if a dentist (takes on) one of our members, they don’t have to have that concern in the back of their mind that their patient is going to cancel at the last minute or not show because of other issues that are going on. We’re really trying to address that.”

Northeast Delta Dental is offering providers $1,000 to join the program to help with the administrative costs of getting credentialed, said Tom Raffio, president and CEO.

The insurer has hired DentaQuest to handle administrative tasks like billing, transportation, and care management services. Recognizing that providers lose money on Medicaid services, they increased the state’s minimum reimbursement rate for some more costly procedures. 

 
 

Dr. Jay Maillet

DentaQuest has arranged “hundreds” of trips for patients, said Dr. Jay Maillet, who oversees the New Hampshire program for the company. Family and friends who transport a patient can also get mileage reimbursement.

“We don’t want people to go under on this thing,” said Maillet, who practiced dentistry in the state for nearly five years before joining DentaQuest. “So we listened to providers.” 

‘We need the workforce’

Providers who’ve begun taking Medicaid patients are busy and will remain so until more join the program.

Allure Dentistry and Braces in Manchester is one of the approximately 50 practices that are participating without a limit on how many patients they will see.

“Our phone requests have pretty much tripled,” said office manager Jennifer Williams. They are currently giving new patients August appointments. “This is a corporate company and they are pretty open with trying to open up access as much as possible,” Williams said.

That’s much harder for smaller practices.

 
 

ABLE-NH, which advocates for people with disabilities, created postcards to help Medicaid patients seek care and encourage dentists to treat them. (Courtesy)

One dentist who has long worked with vulnerable populations began getting 80 calls a day when she said in a media interview that she planned to participate in the New Hampshire Smiles Program. “It was disabling our practice,” she said, asking not to be identified for fear the calls would resume if her name was publicly associated with the program again. 

She said she’s reconsidered her intentions to participate for two reasons: Her office is too small to meet the demand, and the financial losses would be too high. 

“Even the crown (reimbursement) fee is barely covering my lab fee, let alone my two hours of chair time, or my assistant, or the building and insurance,” she said. “Do you want to work the next hour at 25 percent of what you make because it’s the right thing?”

Raffio, who hopes to grow the network to 200 to 250 providers, is counting on more dentists to answer yes to that question. 

“It has to be what I call ‘Level Five Leadership,'” he said. “From the heart, you know? In the final analysis, you have to be willing to do a good deed for society because none of us want to get 50 cents on a dollar. I really do think you have to know that you’re doing this for the betterment of society.”

Coos County Family Dental is one of two North Country providers in the program but the only one taking patients. It is struggling to find appointments for a different reason: workforce shortages.

Ken Gordon, CEO of Coos County Family Health Services, which includes the dental clinic in Berlin, said they don’t expect to book new patients, even those with commercial insurance, until 2025. The nonprofit has partnered with Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital in Colebrook to open a second clinic there in September to meet demand. And it’s received a grant to double the size of the Berlin site.

“But there’s still the workforce issues we’ve got to contend with here,” he said. “We have the facility space, but we still need the workforce to join us.”

 
 

Tom Raffio, president and CEO of Northeast Delta Dental, said Solvere Health’s mobile clinic has expanded access to dental care for people on Medicaid. (Courtesy)

Expanding treatment with mobile clinics, teledentistry

While there is recognition the Medicaid reimbursement rate is an obstacle for some providers, it’s the access to dental care that state officials, oral health advocates, and dental training programs are trying the hardest to tackle now.

Those efforts include not only bringing more practitioners to New Hampshire but also expanding access to care in new ways.

Dentists may be eligible for help with student loans if they commit to taking Medicaid patients or practicing in rural areas. NHTI, which has the only hygienist and dental assistant training programs in New Hampshire, is collaborating with the state and advocacy groups to understand where expanded training or support is most needed.

Lisa Scott, chair of the school’s dental education department, said they’ve had about 20 people complete the hygienist program each of the last two years. The number of dental assistants, who can perform fewer procedures than a hygienist and must work under the direct supervision of a dentist, has gone from 16 last year to 12 this year, she said.

The Harvard School of Dental Medicine and College of Dental Medicine at the University of New England are placing students in public health centers, private practices, or rural areas of the state as part of their training. The hope is they’ll stay in the state. 

Sununu signed legislation on June 28 that will lift state licensing laws by allowing out-of-state professionals to practice in the state if their credential requirements are “substantially similar” to New Hampshire’s.

DentaQuest is referring people who cannot get an appointment but need care quickly to teledentistry.com, which will connect a Medicaid patient with a dentist able to consult virtually and prescribe antibiotics and some pain medication.

 
 

Solvere Heath’s mobile clinic provides cleanings, exams, x-rays, fillings, and restorations. (Courtesy)

Solvere Health’s mobile health clinics in Concord and Colebrook have been another new resource for adult Medicaid patients. Care includes diagnostic exams, x-rays, fillings, extractions, restorations, and antibiotics for infection.

Edward Lorch, the company’s CEO, said the state and Northeast Delta Dental have asked to continue those visits as a resource for people unable to find care in a traditional practice. The mobile clinic has done 120 appointments over the course of eight stops, in Concord, Berlin, and Colebrook, said Jackie Skorvanek, chief of staff. The number of patients is a bit less, she said, because some made a return visit.

“We really believe that the mobile unit, because of the comprehensive care, should be seen as a dental home,” Lorch said. “A lot of these rural areas are dental deserts. To think brick-and-mortar buildings are the only solution is a little bit foolhardy.” 

But brick and mortar is a solution Solvere Health is considering. Lorch said once the company better understands where the mobile clinic is most needed and would be most used, it will consider opening a dental office. 

“Workforce is the primary issue, but I think we have the wherewithal fiscally and culturally,” Lorch said.  “I feel really good about New Hampshire.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX