Posted on

Governor’s health care group has tough time getting past Medicaid barrier (NC)

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Curator summary

 

NC Governor continues to push for expansion, but it may be falling on deaf ears during economic challenges of pandemic as he expects hospitals to help cover increased costs.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.matthewsminthillweekly.com/news/2020/12/governors-health-care-group-has-tough-time-getting-past-medicaid-barrier/

By Julie Havlak
Carolina Journal News Service

Gov. Roy Cooper is still selling Medicaid expansion, but Republican lawmakers aren’t buying. 

The first meeting of the bipartisan N.C. Council for Health Care Coverage, held Dec. 4, fractured into a partisan divide over expanding Medicaid. Cooper spent hours pushing for Medicaid expansion, but Republican lawmakers declared themselves disappointed in his focus. 

Cooper formed the N.C. Council for Health Care Coverage to find solutions for the 17% of adults who are uninsured in North Carolina. The council includes 48 members, including lawmakers, physicians, pastors and businessmen.

Little appears to have changed since Medicaid expansion sank last year’s budget, and it seems likely the issue will haunt the new session in January 2021. 

“To be honest, I was a little disappointed to see that we’re starting with Medicaid expansion, because it has been such a controversial topic,” said Sen. Joyce Krawiec, R-Forsyth. “So I am glad that we’re moving on to other things. We know that in order to increase access, we need to find ways to reduce costs.” 

Cooper wants to expand Medicaid to cover 626,000 people who make less than 138% of the federal poverty level. The federal government picks up 90% of the cost of what Cooper says would be a $4.3 billion price tag in 2021. 

Cooper proposed putting the remaining 10% on hospitals and providers. Whether they are still willing to accept that burden is unclear. Members noted that other states that used a provider tax to pay for expansion also then raised providers’ reimbursement rates. 

“Health-care providers have taken a pretty big hit from COVID,” said Gene Woods, president of Atrium Health. “That’s going to be important to make sure we’re not disrupting access in a different way by mismatching those resources.”

Cooper hasn’t softened his focus on expansion. For two hours, every presentation touted the purported benefits of Medicaid expansion, including covering the working poor, saving rural hospitals and combating the opioid epidemic. 

But Republicans remained unmoved. They changed the conversation once the meeting opened for questions. They argued for ways of reducing the cost of health care, rather than solely focusing on increasing the coverage of those costs. 

Krawiec suggested expanding access to telemedicine and reforming scope of practice and licensure laws to allow providers to practice up to their full abilities. She wants to reform the Certificate of Need laws that choke competition within the state by restricting the supply of medical equipment. 

And she focused on moving ahead with Association Health Plans, which would offer businesses the chance to bargain for health insurance as a larger group. The law allowing the plans is currently tied up in court. 

“It’s just prohibiting a lot of people from getting the coverage they can get,” Krawiec said. “The business community was overwhelming behind it. It’s a great idea to provide coverage for people, especially in low-wage industries.”

Posted on

Feedback on Next Medicaid Managed Care RFP Due December 29 | Department of Health | State of Louisiana

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Curator summary

 

LA is taking input for its Spring 2021 Medicaid managed care RFP.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://ldh.la.gov/index.cfm/newsroom/detail/5912

LDH plans to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) in Spring 2021 to solicit proposals to provide Medicaid managed care services to its more than 1.6 million beneficiaries. To offer your input, visit ldh.la.gov/MCORFP21 and complete the online form, or email your feedback to he*****@**.gov and include “MCO RFP 21” in the subject line. The deadline for all feedback is Tuesday, December 29, 2020.

Posted on

Kentucky Medicaid court case heads to mediation with several hurdles – Louisville Business First

Curator, KY, Managed Care, Roundtable Show

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/news/2020/11/18/medicaid-mediation-starts-at-loggerheads-over-memb.html

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Curator summary

KY MCO lawsuits continue, but with a focus on mediation by early December.

Court documents show that there are hurdles just to get mediation in the case over how the state awarded its Medicaid contracts started.

 

Mediation among the eight organizations at the heart of the controversy surrounding the state’s Medicaid program has started off with conflicting visions for the process.

Court documents filed on Friday show differing views on matters such as timing, how to handle a pending motion in Franklin Circuit Court and disputes over a proposed precondition to the outcome of mediation.

On Nov. 12, Franklin Circuit Court Judge Phillip Shepherd ordered that the two government agencies and six Medicaid companies in the suit try to resolve the matter through mediation and to set a date to do so before Dec. 12.

Under dispute

The two government agencies — the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services and the Finance and Administration Cabinet — filed a joint status report with Medicaid companies: Aetna Better Health of Kentucky Insurance Co., Anthem Kentucky Managed Care Plan Inc. and Molina Healthcare of Kentucky Inc. in which they proposed a mediator: John Van Winkle of Indianapolis-based Van Winkle Baten Dispute Resolution.

They also hope to set a mediation date of no sooner than the week of Nov. 30 and no later than the court-mandated Dec. 12, the report reads. But UnitedHealthcare of Kentucky Ltd. and Humana Health Plan Inc. want to see mediation no later than or on Nov. 26, Thanksgiving, according to a joint status report that also included WellCare Health Insurance Company of Kentucky.

UnitedHealthcare brings one of the most specific demands to the table before the mediation takes place.

“[P]rior to the mediation and included with each party’s mediation statement, each [Medicaid company] must acknowledge a willingness to permit reassignment of its membership,” UnitedHealthcare states.

WellCare and Humana reject the precondition of the Medicaid companies forfeiting members, which is a major sticking point for the lawsuit that preceded the order for mediation. The two government agencies and Aetna, Molina and Anthem reject any preconditions to the mediation talks.

How we got to this point

On Oct. 23, Judge Phillip Shepherd ordered that the state must allow Anthem to remain in the Medicaid program, expanding the number of participant companies from five to six, despite Anthem’s inability to win a contract in two RFP process in the last year.

In court, UnitedHealthcare filed a motion calling for Shepherd to amend his order to release the state from providing a contract to Anthem and to eliminate Molina Healthcare from the program and assign the members of the two companies to United.

With Anthem remaining in the Medicaid program and Molina taking over Passport’s members, UnitedHealthcare contends that there won’t be enough members in the program to make it viable or enough members for the state to meet its contractual obligation to provide enough members to help new Medicaid companies get started.

Posted on

Medicaid managed care companies take protest to court | NC Health News

Curator, Managed Care, North Carolina

 
 

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

 
 

Curator summary

NC managed care now is required to move forward by the legislature by July 2021, though protests/ lawsuits are still pending.

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2020/09/29/medicaid-managed-care-companies-take-protest-to-court-again/

 
 

In the middle of a coronavirus pandemic that has tossed up challenge after challenge, the state Department of Health and Human Services also must tend to another enormous project.

Over the next 10 months, the department has been told by the legislature to complete the transformation of its cumbersome Medicaid system.

In the current system, the state pays for each office visit, test and hospitalization for the seniors and children enrolled in Medicaid. By July 1, North Carolina is expected to launch a managed-care system in which private insurance companies get lump-sum payments from the state to pay providers for their overall care of most of the state’s 2.3 million beneficiaries.

North Carolina lags behind the rest of the country in making this switch and the changeover has been touted by Republican legislators as a potential cost-saver for the state.

As DHHS staff tend to the details of the massive switch of how some 1.6 million Medicaid patients will get health care, companies that lost out on bids for a share of the more than $30 billion the state will dole out over the next five years are stepping up their challenges in court.

In late August, an administrative law judge ruled against Aetna, Optima and My Health By Health Providers, companies that argued DHHS unfairly awarded Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina a contract.

My Health By Health Providers, a consortium of major hospital systems in North Carolina, petitioned a Wake County Superior Court judge this week to reverse that decision.

In the court document filed on Sept. 23, the provider-led entity, or PLE,  argued that the contract awarding process gave a weighted bias to traditional insurance companies over the 12 health systems that have joined together as My Health By Health Providers.

They argue that their owners, which already serve more than 1 million Medicaid beneficiaries each year, are in a better position to provide the managed care, in part, because they are in North Carolina and familiar with the health needs already.

They are troubled that the judge issued a ruling in summary judgment, a step that precluded them from presenting their entire body of evidence in a hearing.

Was the process rigged against PLEs?

Lisa Farrell, executive director of My Health By Health Providers, said her organization was only before the administrative law judge for two hours of arguments.

On Monday, she ticked off a few reasons why she thought the DHHS process was rigged against PLEs from the start. She also explained why My Health By Health Providers is continuing its challenge in Wake County Superior Court instead of trying again when the procurement process opens again.

It’s best to be in on the ground-level, she said.

“One of the considerations as you go forward is members will establish themselves,” Farrell said.

Though My Health By Health Providers was the highest PLE scorer in the bidding process, the state argues that it was looking for a regional plan and the conglomeration of health care systems had pitched a statewide plan. The 2015 law mandating the Medicaid switchover stipulates that PLEs can bid for business in a region, or two contiguous regions, but doesn’t say anything about PLEs bidding for all of the state’s regions.

Farrell argues that My Health By Health Providers’ bid also offered regional options.

While explaining why she thinks PLEs are needed in North Carolina to complement and challenge  the managed care that traditional insurance companies provide, Farrell gave an example of a pediatrician in rural North Carolina treating a child with a complex illness.

The health care systems comprising My Health By Health Providers include Atrium Health, Cape Fear Valley Health, CaroMont Health, Cone Health, Duke Health, Mission Health, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Novant Health, UNC Health, Vidant Health, Wake Forest Baptist Health, and WakeMed Health and Hospitals, some of which are connected to academic research centers.

With that connection, the rural provider could get the patient quickly linked to a health care facility that could provide the more complex care, Farrell argued.

“Providers, because they are providing the care, are really closer to their beneficiaries,” Farrell said.

Conflict of interest contentions

The state’s selections for the coveted managed-care contracts were announced in February 2019. The awards went to four well-established insurance companies: AmeriHealth Caritas, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, UnitedHealthcare and WellCare. Carolina Complete Health, a provider-led group that will be run by Centene, a managed care giant, was the sole provider-led entity selected. The N.C. Medical Society backed that plan.

In challenges that started last year in the state Office of Administrative Hearings, My Health By Health Providers, Aetna and Optima Health, another provider-led group linked to Virginia’s Sentara Healthcare, argued that DHHS employees involved in the contract awarding process had conflicts of interest that caused them to favor BCBSNC over their bids.

The state and BCBSNC have disputed those claims, and on Aug. 25, Tenisha Jacobs, an administrative law judge, sided with them, ruling that the contract had been properly awarded.

DHHS issued a statement several days after the decision.

“The NC Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) is pleased to announce that once again court rulings affirm the integrity and fairness of the Departments’ managed care procurement process,” according to the statement.

Jacobs heralded the possibility of such an outcome in a June 2019 ruling before the companies had presented all their evidence. They had asked her to halt the Medicaid system transformation while their court cases remained unresolved.

Though Jacobs ruled against the request, saying the companies seemed unlikely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the transformation was instead put on hold in late 2019 because of a budget standoff between Gov. Roy Cooper and Republicans leading both General Assembly chambers.

July 2021 launch date

The transformation had been scheduled to begin in February of this year, but the General Assembly closed its 2019 session without a budget that dedicated funding to the project.

This summer, the General Assembly set a new deadline. Lawmakers considered penalizing DHHS if the transformation did not occur by July 1, raising the possibility that the department could be charged millions of dollars for each month after that date that the launch did not occur.

Eventually, the bill that passed did not include penalties.

“North Carolina’s approach to managed care has received national recognition and focuses on improving the health of North Carolinians through an innovative, whole-person centered and well-coordinated system of care that addresses both the medical and non-medical drivers of health,” according to the DHHS statement issued in August after the ruling.

Aetna immediately appealed the August ruling in Wake County Superior Court.

“For the past 18 months, Aetna Better Health has dutifully followed the Office of Administrative Hearings’ (OAH) protest process in our protesting the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services’ (DHHS) awarding of contracts for prepaid health services regarding the state’s Medicaid program on several grounds, including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest between DHHS and certain awarded carriers, changes in the scoring process by DHHS to benefit certain awarded carriers, and DHHS’ attempt to conceal how scores were changed to benefit particular awarded carriers,” Aetna said in a company statement at the time. “After a year and half of protest with little progress, we are left no viable choice procedurally but to pursue our Medicaid protests against DHHS in Superior Court.”

Depositions and 230,000 pages of documents

Dave Richard, deputy DHHS secretary for NC Medicaid, said in an interview last week that while he’s confident in the process used to award the contracts, legal challenges were not unusual.

“I think we’re seeing that across the country that that happens,” Richard said. “No one wants to go through this process. It takes time from people, but we were always prepared that this is a possibility.”

As part of the legal defense, the department produced some 230,000 pages of documents and staff members had to sit through weeks and weeks of depositions.

“The judge ruled in our favor,” Richard said. “We believed she ruled correctly, and we have no reason to believe that there’ll be anything different that happens in the appeal.”

The challengers hope for a different outcome, arguing that they did not get to present all their evidence to the administrative judge.

Could too many lawsuits crash plans?

Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, said the challenges in North Carolina are not unique, but all that litigation eventually might lead states to reconsider managed care systems.

“I appreciate that this is really important stuff, that this is big business, these are contracts that are very, very meaningful,” Salo said in a telephone interview last week. “But having said that, if we keep going on this trajectory, where everybody who doesn’t like the outcome, just resorts to the courts, and sues and has a bid protest, we’re going to end up in a world where states are just going to throw their hands up and say, ‘You know what, it’s easier if we just go back to fee for service.'”

Salo did not speak specifically about the North Carolina cases, but acknowledged that some companies that lose out on contracts might have legitimate concerns that should be litigated.

In Louisiana, contracts worth billions of dollars were thrown out in January after the state’s chief procurement officer determined the health department had mishandled the bidding process.

Two losing bidders helped reveal the problems in challenges filed by Louisiana Healthcare Connections and Aetna Better Health, which banded together to complain of conflicts of interest, a skewed process and improprieties.

“There can be a role for a protest, you know, if something serious has gone wrong, if there was a serious mistake that was made, and sometimes that happens,” Salo said. “You know, it’s important to have an outlet. …There are legitimate protests. And if that’s the case, you should do it.

“What I’m worried about is the trend where it’s just, it’s just a knee jerk reaction of ‘I didn’t like the option. So, I’m escalating to the next step.'”

 
 

Posted on

Health Alliance Plan Acquisition Of Trusted HP – Michigan Approved

MM 1 Sentence Summary- Health Alliance acquires Trusted HP-Michigan 

Health Alliance Plan Acquisition Of Trusted HP – Michigan Approved (highlighted)

Transaction begins Medicaid expansion in metro Detroit for HAP and Henry Ford Health System
News provided by
Sep 19, 2019, 11:15 ET
Henry Ford Health System and Health Alliance Plan (HAP), a nonprofit health plan and operating unit of , announced today that HAP’s acquisition of Trusted HP – Michigan has received all regulatory approvals and the acquisition became effective on .
Wright Lassiter III, president and CEO, Henry Ford Health System
Dr. Michael Genord, Interim President & CEO, HAP
(PRNewsfoto/Health Alliance Plan,Henry Ford)
Henry Ford and HAP announced in June that HAP had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Trusted HP – Michigan, a Medicaid plan based in Detroit, formerly known as Harbor Health Plan, Inc.  The completion of this transaction solidifies HAP’s re-entrance into the state of Michigan’s Medicaid HMO service area known as Region 10, which includes Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties.
“Participation in Michigan’s Region 10 Medicaid service area is a key strategic priority for Henry Ford and HAP given our geographical footprint, and this acquisition positions us for Medicaid growth in our primary service area,” said Wright Lassiter III, President and CEO, Henry Ford Health System.  “HAP and Henry Ford are dedicated to using our joint assets and unique integrated health system programs to improve the quality and access to care for this area’s Medicaid patients, which are among our most vulnerable populations.”
HAP acquired Trusted HP – Michigan from Trusted Health Plan Inc., a Washington, D.C.-based managed care organization.  Previously named Harbor Health Plan and ProCare Health Plan, the plan has been operating as a licensed HMO in Michigan since 2000.  As a result of this transaction, Trusted HP – Michigan’s nearly two dozen employees will become HAP employees.
The terms of the agreement provide for a seamless transition for Trusted HP – Michigan members, who will be able to keep their doctor and continue using their services and current ID cards.  There is no impact to current HAP members as a result of this transaction.  The Trusted brand will remain in place through the end of 2019.  Effective January 1, 2020, all Medicaid members will be under one HAP-branded Medicaid name.
“HAP and Henry Ford Health System are focused on providing Medicaid beneficiaries with a differentiated care model focused on value-based care,” said Dr. Michael Genord, interim president and CEO, HAP.  “We are investing in care coordination programs, including those aimed at social determinants of health, to improve the health and well-being of the members we serve.  And we are thrilled that this now includes Trusted’s Medicaid members, most of whom are in Wayne County.”
HAP serves 570,000 total members across Michigan.  HAP’s subsidiary, HAP Midwest Health Plan, offers Medicaid products under the HAP Empowered name. HAP Empowered is currently available in Region 6, which includes Genesee, Huron, Lapeer, Sanilac, Shiawassee, St. Clair and Tuscola counties. Covered Medicaid programs offered through HAP Empowered include health care coverage for people impacted by the Flint water crisis, MIChild, Healthy Michigan Plan and Children’s Special Health Care Services.
HAP also participates in the MI Health Link Dual Demonstration Project, serving 4,500 members who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid in Wayne and Macomb counties, including some of the most underserved areas of Detroit.
About Henry Ford Health System
Henry Ford Health System is a six-hospital system headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. It is one of the nation’s leading comprehensive, integrated health systems, recognized for clinical excellence and innovation. Henry Ford provides both health insurance and health care delivery, including acute, specialty, primary and preventive care services backed by excellence in research and education. Henry Ford Health System is led by President & CEO Wright Lassiter III. Visit HenryFord.com to learn more.
About Health Alliance Plan
Health Alliance Plan (HAP) is a Michigan-based, nonprofit health plan that provides health coverage to individuals and companies of all sizes. For nearly 60 years, HAP has partnered with leading doctors and hospitals, employers and community organizations to enhance the health and well-being of the lives it touches. HAP offers a product portfolio with six distinct product lines: Group Insured Commercial, Individual, Medicare, Medicaid (using the HAP Empowered name), Self-Funded and Network Leasing. HAP excels in delivering award-winning preventive services, disease management and wellness programs, as well as personalized customer service. For more information, visit www.hap.org.
SOURCE Henry Ford Health System; Health Alliance Plan

Related Links

Posted on

New Hampshire regulators block Partners acquisition over antitrust concerns – Boston Business Journal

MM 1 Sentence Summary- NH attorney general blocks Massachusetts Gen Hospital from acquiring Partners saying it will violate state antitrust laws 

New Hampshire regulators block Partners acquisition over antitrust concerns

Sep 20, 2019, 1:07pm EDT
Partners HealthCare’s plan to further its expansion into New Hampshire ran into a roadblock on Friday, with the Granite State’s attorney general, Gordon MacDonald, saying the acquisition would violate state antitrust laws.
In May 2018, Partners’ flagship Massachusetts General Hospital announced that it planned to acquire Exeter Health Resources in New Hampshire. Plans called for Exeter to merge with Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, which MGH acquired in 2017, forming a new non-profit system for New Hampshire’s Seacoast region.
While the attorney general’s charitable trusts unit has been reviewing the transaction since the hospitals submitted materials in May 2019, the attorney general’s consumer protection and antitrust bureau has been conducting a private review of the transactions for over a year.
Last week, the antitrust division issued a notice of intent to halt the transaction over concerns of antitrust violations. The charitable trusts unit subsequently issued a report Friday objecting to the proposed transaction, noting that if the hospitals resolve concerns with the antitrust division, it can refile its submission to charitable trusts.
“Our most important duty is to protect the public and we will not hesitate to use the enforcement tools available to us to do so,” MacDonald said in a statement. “New Hampshire patients already pay some of the highest prices for health care in the country. Based on our investigation, we have concluded that this transaction implicates our laws protecting free and fair competition and therefore threatens even higher health care costs to be borne by New Hampshire consumers.”
In a release, hospital officials said they expect to continue conversations with the attorney general on the benefits of the transaction to ultimately resolve the concerns.
“We are optimistic that the parties can continue to have an open dialogue with the regulators or government officials about this important affiliation,” said Dr. Peter Slavin, MGH’s president. “We remain fully committed to seeing this transaction through and are confident that the Attorney General’s Office will ultimately determine that our affiliation will pass antitrust review based on the thorough review that the expert economists have completed on this proposal. We look forward to continuing to enhance quality healthcare in the Seacoast Region.”
Posted on

Blue Cross puts merger on hold amid video showing CEO sideswiping tractor trailer on I-85

MM 1 Sentence Summary- BCBS and Cambia Health’s merge has been delayed because of CEO Conway’s legal trouble 

Blue Cross puts merger on hold amid video showing CEO sideswiping tractor trailer on I-85

September 24, 2019 12:57 PM
Video appears to show BCBS CEO driving erratically, hitting tractor-trailer on I-85
A video provided to The News & Observer appears to show an SUV driven by Patrick Conway, president and CEO of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of NC, weaving between lanes for several miles on Interstate 85 before colliding with a tractor-trailer. By Submitted Video
ASHEBORO
North Carolina’s largest health insurer on Tuesday suspended an ongoing merger, making the announcement the same day new details emerged about its CEO’s recent driving charges.
“Blue Cross NC has decided to put its proposed strategic affiliation with Cambia Health Solutions on temporary hold,” the company announced in an email to media shortly after 3 p.m. “Blue Cross NC is committed to focusing on its customers, employees and the North Carolina communities it serves.”
TOP ARTICLES
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina and Cambia, an Oregon-based company, announced their intentions to form a partnership in March. The two companies would together cover around 6 million people and have about $16 billion in combined revenue, the News & Observer previously reported.

Blue Cross is bigger than Cambia, reporting $9.9 billion in revenue last year and covering 3.7 million people. Cambia had revenue of about $6 billion on coverage of around 2.6 million people.
Blue Cross announced the merger being put on hold on the same day that new details emerged about Dr. Patrick Conway, its president and CEO. A video provided to The News & Observer Tuesday appears to show Conway weaving between lanes for several miles on Interstate 85 before sideswiping a tractor-trailer.
Conway, 45, was charged with driving while impaired and misdemeanor child abuse after the June 22 accident. His two daughters were in the car, according to police.

Video of Conway’s car

The video, shot by a motorist on I-85 and sent to police, shows an SUV that appears to match the 2017 Cadillac listed on the report from Archdale police.
An affidavit from the Archdale officer said Conway smelled of alcohol, had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech and was unsteady on his feet. He refused a blood-alcohol test and had his license revoked for 30 days, according to court records.
According to a confidential police report obtained by WRAL, Conway denied wrongdoing and later became “belligerent” at the police station.
The report quotes Conway saying: “’You had a choice. You could have let me go. You don’t know who I am. I am a doctor, a CO of a company. I’ll call Governor Cooper and get you in trouble,’“ WRAL reported.
Cooper “was not involved in this incident in any way,” spokesman Ford Porter told The N&O.
Blue Cross didn’t comment on Tuesday’s reports. Conway’s attorney, Thomas Walker, released a statement to the N&O saying the CEO is “deeply ashamed and embarrassed” about the pain he caused family and co-workers.
“He knows his conduct was unacceptable and not consistent with who he is as a person. He has never had an incident like this before,” Walker said.
“To his credit, he immediately disclosed the incident to the Blue Cross NC Board. He stepped down from his daily duties and voluntarily and successfully completed 30 days of inpatient substance use treatment. He’s committed to continuing to handle this appropriately going forward and will do so.”

Blue Cross response

Last week, state Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey asked for Conway to be replaced by an interim president while his charges are resolved, calling them “alarming.”
He also chided the Blue Cross board for appearing to hide the arrest, saying he expected the insurer’s executive team to be more “accountable, responsible and transparent.”
Conway earned $3.59 million last year, WRAL reported.
In response, board Chairman Frank Holding Jr. said Conway had undergone a professional substance abuse assessment and attended a 30-day inpatient treatment.
“Based on detailed information shared by the facility based on Dr. Conway’s assessment and treatment, the board was satisfied Dr. Conway could continue to provide strong leadership to BlueCross NC,” Holding’s letter said.
Blue Cross “refrained” from talking publicly about Conway’s incident “out of respect for the legal process underway in Randolph County, Dr. Conway’s right to due process, and medical privacy concerns and obligations,” Holding added.

Washington commissioner’s letter

On Tuesday night, Washington’s state insurance commissioner released a letter he sent to Cambia Heath Solutions’ Board of Directors earlier that day.
In the letter, Commissioner Mike Kreidler said his office is reviewing the proposed merger of Cambia with Blue Cross. Cambia was formerly known as The Regence Group, according to its website.
Krieidler said he learned only about Conway’s June arrest on Sept. 19, the day news reports were published about the allegations. He said he learned about the arrest after Cambia CEO Mark Ganz asked for his personal cell phone number “to communicate an urgent message that could not wait until normal business hours.”
Kreidler said Blue Cross should have notified him immediately and had a “legal obligation” to inform him within two business days of “any material changes” to Conway’s biographical affidavit.
“The fact that Dr. Conway was arrested and faces serious allegations and charges is without question a material change,” Kreidler wrote.
“I am deeply troubled by your failure to communicate responsibly and transparently,” he said in the letter to the board of directors. “Both the board and CEO share the responsibility to deal with my office in a straightforward and honest fashion. Secrets are not permissible.
“Your behavior in this matter must, and will, be taken into account as my office considers the Cambia/Regence’s request for a merger,” the letter concluded.
Staff writers Zachery Eanes and Mark Schultz contributed to this story
Paul “Andy” Specht reports on North Carolina leaders and state politics for The News & Observer and PolitiFact. Specht previously covered Raleigh City Hall and town governments around the Triangle. He’s a Raleigh native who graduated from Campbell University in Buies Creek, N.C. Contact him at as*****@**********er.com or (919) 829-4870.


Major Blue Health Insurers Drop Deal to Combine

Move comes after resignation of North Carolina insurer CEO Patrick Conway

By
Anna Wilde Mathews,
Leslie Scism and
Valerie Bauerlein
Oct. 11, 2019 8:51 pm ET
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina and Cambia Health Solutions said they were dropping plans to combine, after the resignation of the North Carolina insurer’s chief executive.
Former Blue Cross of North Carolina CEO Patrick Conway had stepped down amid fallout over an allegedly alcohol-related traffic accident. The two insurers had said they were pausing their deal on Sept. 24, as details of the June incident emerged.
Posted on

Optima Health to take majority stake in Virginia Premier | Virginia Business

MM 1 Sentence Summary- Optima Health Plan takes majority ownership of MCO VA Premier and together they will serve 800k members. 

Optima Health to take majority stake in Virginia Premier (Highlighted)

Published September 26, 2019 by Robert Powell, III
Virginia Beach-based Optima Health Plan will become the majority owner of Richmond-based Virginia Premier, a nonprofit managed-care organization.
Virginia Premier was founded in 1995 by VCU Health System. The Richmond-based health system will retain a 20% ownership stake in Virginia Premier. Together, Optima and Virginia Premier will serve nearly 800,000 members. Optima is a subsidiary of Norfolk-based Sentara Healthcare.
“As provider-led health plans, Optima Health and Virginia Premier share similar cultures, values and a commitment to delivering innovative services that meet the unique needs of the populations we serve,” Dennis A. Matheis, president of Optima Health and executive vice president of Sentara Healthcare, said in a statement. “Together, we will be better positioned to increase access to quality care, achieve greater efficiencies and develop new services to improve our members’ overall experience.”
Optima and Virginia Premier are two of the state’s original Medicaid managed care organizations. Company officials said Virginia Premier and Optima will continue to operate as separate entities, retaining their names and brands. Virginia Premier will maintain an operations center in Richmond and a presence in other areas in the state.
Measure
Measure
Posted on

-Feds reviewing Cuomo’s Fidelis deal : Empire Center for Public Policy

Feds reviewing Cuomo’s Fidelis deal (Highlighted)

by Bill Hammond |  October 03, 2019 | NY Torch
Federal officials are reviewing the state’s expropriation of $2 billion from the sale of Fidelis Care health plan, potentially throwing a wrench into the Cuomo administration’s plans for using the money.
An Aug. 21 letter from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, recently posted on the state Health Department’s website, says the Fidelis transaction is being examined “pursuant to Section 1903(w) of the Social Security Act.”
That section of law is meant to discourage states from using certain tactics to raise revenue for their Medicaid programs. Depending on the outcome of the CMS review, the state could ultimately lose a share of its federal matching aid – which would add to the Medicaid program’s burgeoning budget crunch.
The feds’ review adds a new wrinkle to a deal engineered by Cuomo last year, which was the focus of a front-page expose in today’s New York Times.
Founded as a Catholic-affiliated non-profit health plan, Fidelis agreed in September 2017 to be bought out by for-profit Centene Corp. for a price of $3.75 billion. The state’s Catholic bishops intended to put the proceeds into a charitable foundation, but Governor Cuomo insisted that the money should go to state government instead – on grounds that most of Fidelis’ business had come from government-funded programs such as Medicaid, Child Health Plus and the Essential Plan.
Under pressure from Cuomo, the bishops and Centene agreed to pay the state $2 billion over four years. Cuomo and Legislature placed the money into a newly established “Health Care Transformation Fund,” which the governor could spend at his discretion on a broad range of health-related purposes.
The first use of the funds came in October 2018, which the Health Department announced Medicaid rate increases of 2 percent for hospitals and 1.5 percent for nursing homes – a major victory for influential interest groups that included one of the governor’s biggest campaign donors.
In the Aug. 21 letter, CMS gave approval for the nursing home rate increase but added a note of caution about the revenue source:
During our review of the proposed state plan changes, CMS became aware that the State of New York received considerable revenues related to [the] sale of assets between Fidelis Care (a non-profit insurer associated with Catholic Diocese of New York) and Centene Corporation (a for profit health insurer). Our review of these revenues is still ongoing pursuant section 1903(w) of the Act.
Section 1903(w) restricts the ability of states to finance Medicaid with revenue from health-care sources. The concern is that states will allocate a certain amount of money for Medicaid, use that expenditure to draw federal matching funds, then grab back all or most of their initial expenditure through taxes or “donations” paid by the health-care industry. If the quasi-voluntary payments by Fidelis and Centene are determined to violate this rule, the federal government is supposed to reduce the state’s allocation of federal Medicaid funding by the amount of the improper payments.
The outcome of CMS’s review is hard to predict. What’s clear is that an adverse decision would open a new hole in state finances.
For example: The state has projected that its share of the rate increases for hospitals and nursing homes would be $500 million over four years – but that assumed a roughly dollar-for-dollar match from Washington. If CMS rejects the use of Fidelis funds, and reduces aid accordingly, the state would need to put up another $500 million of its own.
Even without this complication, the Cuomo administration has been struggling to balance Medicaid’s finances. The program ran so far over budget that the state delayed $1.7 billion in payments from March to April, shifting the expense from fiscal year 2019 to fiscal year 2020. Budget reports since then have warned that Medicaid spending continues to exceed expectations, and that the state might have to make program cuts or delay further payments in the future.

Measure
Measure
Posted on

Healthplex Acquired by Affiliates of MCNA Dental



Healthplex Acquired by Affiliates of MCNA Dental (highlighted)

PR NewswireSeptember 17, 2019
UNIONDALE, N.Y., Sept. 17, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — Healthplex, Inc., announced today that, following the receipt of all required regulatory approvals, the company has been acquired by affiliates of MCNA Dental, the largest full-risk Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program dental benefits manager in the country. These combined affiliate companies will serve over 8 million members nationwide.
“The addition of Healthplex to our family of companies allows us to take the next step in our strategy for growth, complementing our national platform and expanding our commercial dental insurance products and other offerings. Healthplex shares in our mission of promoting accessible dental care for all. Our entire organization is enthusiastic about this opportunity to further transform oral health care in our communities by delivering enhanced value for the members, providers, Managed Care Organizations, and state partners we serve,” said Glen Feingold, Chief Operating Officer for MCNA Dental.
MCNA Dental has a proven 27-year track record of facilitating high quality, cost effective oral healthcare services. MCNA serves beneficiaries in Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Iowa, Idaho, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Utah all through direct contracts with the state Medicaid agencies in each state. It was the first dental plan in the nation to receive full URAC Dental Plan Accreditation and has maintained NCQA accreditation in credentialing since 2011.
Founded in 1977 by Dr. Martin Kane and Dr. Stephen Cuchel, Healthplex is a New York-based dental insurance and management company with extensive experience in both government-funded and commercial dental programs. Healthplex has provided best-in-class dental services to government-funded programs through contracts with Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) since 1995. The company currently administers dental benefits for the programs of 33 MCO clients to include Medicaid, Child Health Plus, Medicare, MLTC, FIDA, Essential, and HARP plans. Healthplex also underwrites and administers dental plans for 225 prominent labor unions and municipalities, and 3,000 commercial businesses. The company currently serves 2.4 million members in New York State.
“The Healthplex team is looking forward to combining our regional expertise with MCNA’s national presence while implementing proven best practices, making both companies stronger. I am personally excited to have the opportunity to continue to build upon Healthplex’s 40-year story of growth with a company so closely aligned with our vision and our commitment to service in our community. Healthplex already manages the highest rated dental plans in our markets, and having the energy and enthusiasm of the Feingold family behind us will make Healthplex that much more formidable as a competitor in our existing and expansion markets,” said Christopher Schmidt, President and CEO of Healthplex.
DLA Piper LLP (US) and Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf LLP served as legal adviser to the selling shareholders of Healthplex, Inc., throughout the acquisition process. Akerman LLP and Greenberg Traurig LLP of New York served as legal advisers to the purchasers and MCNA Dental.
Healthplex, New York’s only dental plan founded by dentists, has over 40 years of experience in  administering and insuring dental benefits, specializing in the design of cost-effective dental programs for Medicaid, Child Health Plus (CHP), Medicare, Health Exchanges, Corporations, Unions, Municipalities, Small Business, FIDA, HARP, MLTC, and Essential Plans. The company serves over 2.4 million members, and maintains the largest, most comprehensive dental provider network in New York State. Healthplex is certified by NCQA as a Credentials Verification Organization (CVO). The company is also accredited by NCQA in Utilization Management. Healthplex is committed to providing access to high quality affordable dental care and to improving the oral health of our community.
Contact: Valerie Vignola
Healthplex, Inc.
Phone: 516-542-2264
333 Earle Ovington Blvd., Suite 300
Uniondale, NY 11553
Cision
Measure
Measure