Great conversation with Patrick Sims, VP of Growth at Drive Health. He and Clay talked about Drive Health and Agentic AI, ACAP, and Medicaid changes versus new technology. Run time: 5 mins
Category: Uncategorized
[LIVE @ ACAP] Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Sean Schreiber
Great conversation with Sean Schreiber, COO of Alliance Health. He and Clay talked about navigating changes, opportunity for innovation versus uncertainty with funding advice, and he gives great advice! Run time: 8 mins
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Joanne Borduas
Great conversation with Joanne Borduas, CEO of Community Health & Wellness Center. She and Clay talked about Medicaid changes, non-Medicaid care, and she gives great advice! Run time: 17 mins
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Nicole McKinney
Great conversation with Dr. Nicole McKinney, CEO of Collaborative Health Network. She and Clay talked about Integrated Whole Person Care and Medicaid changes. Run time: 15 mins
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with George Kraehe
Great conversation with George Kraehe, Director of New Mexico Medicaid Fraud & Elder Abuse Division. He and Clay talked about what success in the division looks like, advice for MFCUs, and agency coordination. Run time: 15 mins
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Antonio Ciaccia
Great conversation with Antonio Ciaccia, CEO at 46brooklyn Research & President of 3 Axis Advisors. He and Clay talked about PBMs, MFN, and 340B. Run time: 25 mins
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Susan Clark
Great conversation with Susan Clark, VP of Interoperability Strategy at Converge Health. She and Clay talked about Data Sharing, Interoperability, and Prior Authorizations. Run time: 31 mins
CMS NEWS – The hidden costs of cutting Medicaid
Alternative Headline: Medicaid Cuts Ripple Widely
[MM Curator Summary]: Medicaid cuts in the new Republican tax and spending bill could cause 10 million to lose insurance, straining clinics, hospitals, and patients while worsening medical debt and long-term economic health.
========================================
With the passage of the big Republican tax and spending bill, the federal government is poised to reduce support for Medicaid and the insurance marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that these cuts could cause 10 million Americans to lose health insurance by 2034.
Lawmakers have justified these cuts as a necessary step to address the bigger budget deficit exacerbated by tax cuts and other spending increases in the big bill. However, that doesn’t capture how these cuts will send costs spilling out around society, to be paid by hospitals, clinics, individuals and then in the end, back to the federal government.
Where do people go if they are uninsured?
Health care is different from other goods, like movie tickets, cocktails, or cars. If people can’t pay for health care, they don’t suddenly stop needing it. So, where do people get their health care if they don’t have health insurance?
One option is federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) – community clinics that provide low-income people comprehensive primary care, dental services, mental health and substance abuse services and specialty care. FQHCs charge a subsidized rate based on ability to pay, with 90% of their patients at or below 200% of the federal poverty line. They are a vital source of care for the uninsured or the underinsured, with over 15,000 sites serving over 31 million patients in 2023.
Sure, slashing the number of people on Medicaid will reduce taxpayer dollars going to the Medicaid program. But FQHCs rely on Medicaid patients as their primary source of revenue, and use grant funding from the federal government to cover the costs of providing care to the uninsured. Cuts to Medicaid coverage, without commensurate increases in federal grants to cover the costs of the uninsured, could threaten the stability and scope of FQHCs. Even with grants amounting to $5.6 billion in 2023, FQHCs operate on razor-thin margins, and declining Medicaid enrollment following the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated their financial strain. So, short of increased grant funding, clinics may have to cut spending per patient, could have a harder time recruiting and retaining medical providers, or reduce the number of services offered to patients. This could result in more uninsured patients resorting to the hospital emergency rooms to close the gap.
Hospitals as insurers of last resort
Due to a variety of factors, hospitals must treat patients regardless of their ability to pay. For example, federal law requires that hospitals provide care to all patients who show up in their emergency departments. In addition, federal law mandates that non-profit hospitals must provide some community benefit via charity care, or "free or discounted health services" to maintain their tax-exempt status. Nonprofit hospitals are an important source of care – nearly half of all hospitals in the U.S. are nonprofit. Medical ethics also compel physicians to be "Good Samaritans" and treat patients regardless of their ability to pay.
Through the tax-exempt status of nonprofit hospitals, taxpayers are effectively subsidizing some of this charity care for the uninsured. But, cutting Medicaid is going to hurt hospitals, too. Half of rural hospitals are already operating at a deficit, and the Medicaid cuts threaten to push an additional 300 hospitals "towards a fiscal cliff". While concern over rural hospital closures led to an additional $50 billion being allocated to a "Rural Health Transformation Program," an analysis by KFF estimates that this only offsets one-third of the lost revenue from the Medicaid cuts.
A paperby economists Craig Garthwaite, Tal Gross, and Matthew Notowidigdo argues that hospitals act as "insurers of last resort." When policy makers cut Medicaid enrollment, hospitals ultimately bear the cost. According to MACPAC (the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission), hospitals provided $22.5 billion worth of uncompensated care to uninsured individuals in 2021, for a total of nearly $40 billion spent on charity care and bad debt (or, around 5 to 6% of hospital expenses). Using hospital financial data, the authors estimate that for each visit from the uninsured, hospitals bear on average $11,000 of uncompensated care costs.
Nonprofit hospitals, both religious and secular alike, report higher uncompensated care costs. When the uninsured population increases, for-profit hospitals report small and insignificant effects on uncompensated care costs. Each additional uninsured person in the country leads to, on average, an additional $800 that hospitals pay in uncompensated care costs.
Medical debt
So far, we’ve found that increasing the uninsured population places financial burdens on two important parts of the social safety net: community health clinics and nonprofit hospitals. But what about the patients themselves?
Even among those with health insurance, expensive medical bills coupled with high deductibles and cost-sharing can lead to medical debt and in some cases, bankruptcy. An analysis from KFF found that 20 million people, or around 8% of adults, have some form of medical debt, with around 6%of adults owing more than $1,000. In total, people in the U.S. hold a whopping $220 billion in medical debt. The incidence of medical debt is higher among the uninsured (11%), low-income people (11%), and those with disabilities (13%).
Being uninsured and having an inpatient hospital stay can spell financial disaster. This study, entitled "The Economic Consequences of Hospital Admissions," finds that having a hospital admission while uninsured increases the probability of bankruptcy by nearly 40%. They estimate that hospital admissions are estimated to be responsible for around 6% of bankruptcies for the uninsured, and even 4% of bankruptcies for the insured.
However, the research consistently shows that getting coverage can save the uninsured from medical ruin. Using the Medicaid expansions from the mid-1990s and early 2000s, another study finds that a 10 percentage point increase in Medicaid eligibility reduces consumer bankruptcies by 8%. The famed Oregon health insurance experiment, which randomly gave people Medicaid coverage, finds similar results. Having health insurance reduces the probability of an unpaid medical bill sent to collections agencies by 25% and reduces the probability of having out-of-pocket medical expenditures by 35%.
Poor health makes us all poorer
Being uninsured is, understandably, bad for your health: the uninsured receive less preventative care, have greater difficulty obtaining prescription drugs and dental care, and are less likely to get the specialty care they need. It’s also bad economically for the uninsured themselves as we’ve shown above. But a more unhealthy populace is bad for the economy itself, too: long-term evidence shows that having insurance coverage as a child improves future productivity as an adult. By the age of 28, those who had Medicaid coverage as a child had higher college enrollment, higher wages, and used fewer government benefits. This paper estimates that the government was able to recoup 58 cents on every dollar spent on childhood Medicaid coverage. Having a sick workforce is just bad for economic growth: workers in poor health work fewer hours, reducing our overall labor productivity.
So, the federal government may save money by tightening Medicaid eligibility, but this will put strain on other parts of the economy. Community health clinics, hospitals, patients, and taxpayers, will all be footing the bill in some ways, and of course the uninsured themselves.
COLOR CODE:
General item, but important. Gets at main point of article= YELLOW
Has a dollar amount or number = GREEN
A specific topic that seems to be different than other topics = BLUE
Medicaid Conversations: Interview with Emily Zalkovsky
Great conversation with Emily Zalkovsky, Texas State Medicaid Director. She and Clay talked about what they’re doing in Women’s Health, Dual Enrollment, and MMIS. Run time: 14 mins
CMS NEWS – Feds greenlight $9 billion in supplemental Medicaid funds as GOP weighs new limits
Alternative Headline: 15 States Gain Medicaid Boost
[MM Curator Summary]: Medicaid providers in 15 states will receive up to $9 billion in supplemental funding through newly approved federal agreements.
========================================
Hospitals, physician groups, and nursing homes across 15 states will receive billions of dollars in extra Medicaid funding this year thanks to federal health care officials signing off on new agreements.
In almost all of the new agreements, states will pay health care providers average commercial prices to treat Medicaid patients — a boon for providers that often decry Medicaid as one of their worst-paying insurers.
The influx of recently approved Medicaid funds, known as state directed payment arrangements, highlights how the industry and state leaders of all political stripes have tapped a lucrative well within Medicaid. And the race is on to get more agreements across the finish line before Congress or the White House intervenes.
COLOR CODE:
General item, but important. Gets at main point of article= YELLOW
Has a dollar amount or number = GREEN
A specific topic that seems to be different than other topics = BLUE
