Posted on

Centene lays off 3% of workforce

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: This story pins the layoffs on the wind-down. But the really question is: Did plans really staff up to handle the enrollment surge during the PHE? Was it hard to manage all those soft-ball rate cells?

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/centene-layoffs-medicaid-redeterminations-medicare-stars/694872/

An article from

 
 

The layoffs at Centene follow similar workforce reductions at CVS Health earlier this summer.

 
 

Samantha Liss for Healthcare Dive

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Dive Brief:

  • Centene is laying off 2,000 employees — a little over 3% of its workforce — as the health insurer struggles with headwinds from Medicaid redeterminations and Medicare Advantage star ratings.
  • The layoffs were confirmed to Healthcare Dive by a company spokesperson. Centene has recently sold off assets, including AI platform Apixio and UK unit Circle Health Group, to refocus on its core business.
  • Centene is the latest payer to undergo layoffs this year. In August, CVS announced it would lay off 5,000 employees, or 2% of its workforce, amid cost pressures integrating recent multi-billion-dollar acquisitions.

Dive Insight:

Health insurers brought in record profits during the pandemic as individuals delayed non-essential medical services, but some have stumbled this year amid pressures like normalizing utilization, regulatory changes in MA and states resuming Medicaid eligibility checks.

Payers with a heavy government presence like Centene and Molina are particularly exposed to headwinds in Medicare and Medicaid.

Centene, which contracts with 31 states to offer Medicaid coverage, is the largest Medicaid managed care organization in the U.S. Earlier this year, the payer lowered its 2024 earnings guidance due to expectations that Medicaid redeterminations will increase spending and lower premium revenue next year.

States could begin removing Medicaid beneficiaries from their rolls as early as April after resuming eligibility checks for the safety-net health insurance program.

Centene lost 262,700 Medicaid members from redeterminations in the second quarter, dropping its total Medicaid lives to just over 16 million.

Research firm Wolfe Research downgraded Centene in July, citing the impact of redeterminations along with concerns about the payer’s ability to improve its Medicare Advantage star ratings. Morgan Stanley also downgraded Centene in August, expressing similar concerns.

Centene is one of several payers that saw their star ratings, a measure of plan quality and member satisfaction that results in bonuses, fall for 2023, pressuring earnings targets. The St. Louis-based payer has taken a number of steps to improve its stars, including investing in provider enablement and focusing more on medically complex members, which management has said should help.

The CMS will release 2024 star ratings in October.

Health insurers aren’t the only healthcare companies that have turned to layoffs to cut costs in a difficult operating environment. Nonprofit hospital giant CommonSpirit laid off an undisclosed number of employees during its third quarter and 2,000 additional positions in its fourthWalgreens laid off 10% of its corporate workforce in May.

Physician enablement company Clover Health and doctor networking platform Doximity both laid off 10% of their employees earlier this year, while primary care chain Cano Health let 700 employees go over the summer.

Other companies that underwent layoffs this year include Oracle-owned EHR vendor Cerner, telehealth provider Teladoc, Google’s life sciences sister company Verily and testmaker Abbott.

Posted on

Casey Urges Medicaid Agency to Crack Down on Health Insurers Who Harm Patients by Denying Coverage of Medically Necessary Care

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Focus on MCO prior auth behaviors intensifies.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.casey.senate.gov/news/releases/casey-urges-medicaid-agency-to-crack-down-on-health-insurers-who-harm-patients-by-denying-coverage-of-medically-necessary-care

More than 67 million Americans receive Medicaid coverage from a managed care organization (MCO)

In letter, Casey raises concerns about health insurance companies routinely denying coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid MCOs

Washington, D.C. Today, U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, sent a letter to Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure seeking information about the oversight of Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs). In the letter, Chairman Casey raises concerns about health insurance companies routinely denying coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid MCOs—an issue examined in recent watchdog reports that Casey previously requested. The letter seeks information about the steps CMS and states are taking are being taken to protect Medicaid enrollees and prevent MCOs from putting their bottom line ahead of the interests of patients seeking care.

“It is abundantly clear that MCO denials of coverage can negatively affect patients,” wrote Chairman Casey. “The Office of the Inspector General’s findings—coupled with the everyday experiences of my constituents in Pennsylvania—demonstrate more must be done so that older adults, people with disabilities, and children, all receive the care they need and deserve.”

State Medicaid programs pay health insurance companies a fixed annual fee, known as capitated payments, to operate MCOs that provide health insurance to Medicaid enrollees. MCOs have grown to become the dominant delivery system for health care coverage within the Medicaid program. More than 67 million people received full or partial Medicaid coverage from MCOs in 2020, accounting for 84 percent of enrollees.

In 2019, Chairman Casey sent a letter to the Office the Inspector General (OIG) calling for an investigation of whether patients enrolled in MCOs can successfully access the services to which they are entitled. Subsequently, OIG released a series of oversight reports issuing recommendations to MCOs, states, and CMS to address issues including repeated instances of improper service denials and failures to provide enrollees with information needed to file appeals. Today’s letter from Chairman Casey seeks additional information and data from CMS and urges the agency to implement OIG’s recommendations to ensure patients are not being denied care.

Senator Casey has a long record of fighting to protect and expand Medicaid. Earlier this month, Senator Casey introduced the Medicaid for Every Child Act, which would automatically enroll every child in Medicaid from birth until age 18. The bill would guarantee coverage for over 2.6 million children in Pennsylvania, including over 645,000 children in rural counties where health care has historically been more difficult to access.

Read the full letter here or below:

Dear Administrator Brooks-LaSure:

I write concerning recent independent watchdog reports that show health insurance companies routinely deny coverage of medically necessary care for people enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations (MCO). This month, the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) released the last in a series of four reports examining improper MCO coverage denials. Conducted in response to my request, the OIG’s findings—coupled with the everyday experiences of my constituents in Pennsylvania—demonstrate more must be done so that older adults, people with disabilities, and children, all receive the care they need and deserve. Therefore, I am seeking information to ensure appropriate steps are taken to ensure MCOs are not putting their bottom line ahead of the interests of patients seeking care.

Operated by insurance companies, MCOs administer Medicaid benefits on behalf of states in exchange for fixed fees known as “capitated payments” that are based on the number of members enrolled in a given plan. Independent watchdogs have long expressed concern about the MCO model and the potential financial incentive for insurers to reduce costs by limiting payments and denying coverage.  In 2019, I asked OIG to examine whether patients enrolled in MCOs can successfully access the services to which they are entitled, and to review whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was providing sufficient oversight to ensure enrollees receive the care they deserve. MCOs’ footprint has grown tremendously to become what CMS recently described as the “dominant delivery system” for Medicaid, providing full or partial health coverage to more than 67 million Americans, which accounts for 84 percent of Medicaid enrollees.

Following my request, OIG conducted a national evaluation of Medicaid MCOs that it published in July. OIG’s review examined 115 plans, each with at least 10,000 enrollees, that were spread across 37 states and operated by seven companies. OIG found that the MCOs it evaluated denied 12.5 percent of requests for prior authorization during the report’s 12-month review period in 2019. Denial rates varied from state to state, company to company, and plan to plan. For example, OIG found that one insurer operating plans in 13 states had denial rates ranging from 5 percent to 29 percent, and that denial rates for various MCOs in California ranged from 7 percent to 29 percent. OIG also found that 2.7 million people were enrolled in MCOs that denied 25 percent or more of claims. One Illinois plan denied 41 percent of claims, while two other plans—in Georgia, and Texas—denied one-third of claims, according to the OIG report.

OIG wrote that it was “unclear why some MCOs had rates of prior authorization denials that were so much higher than their peers,” but it is abundantly clear that improper coverage denials can negatively affect patients. The denied care included drug therapy, health screening services for children, and inpatient hospital services, according to OIG’s report. In one instance, OIG detailed how an MCO denied in-home skilled nursing care requested for a pediatric patient diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, Down syndrome, and a series of other medical conditions that required gastrostomy tube feeding and enzyme therapy several times a day. In another instance, OIG found that an MCO denied covering the replacement of a broken stairlift for a partially paralyzed 77-year-old enrollee, before overturning its decision more than six weeks later when the denial was appealed. OIG identified several issues contributing to improper denials, including “MCOs allowing inappropriate staff or inadequately trained staff to make decisions about whether to approve prior authorization requests, using incorrect criteria to determine whether to approve requests, and failure to request additional information before issuing decisions.” OIG raised further concern that improper denials disproportionately affect communities of color and low-income communities.

While the OIG’s data suggest that Pennsylvania’s MCOs have comparatively low denial rates compared to other states, Pennsylvanians enrolled in MCOs nonetheless experience difficulties with improper denials. For example, one Philadelphia resident who relies on in-home care to bathe, use the toilet, and go to medical appointments, reported that the stress of fighting their MCO over cuts to covered care in-home care exacerbates their existing physical illnesses. Providers and patient advocates in Pennsylvania cited multiple examples of patients whose health was put at risk when time-sensitive care was delayed by denials that can take weeks, months, and even years, to appeal.

One attorney who frequently represents Medicaid enrollees on behalf of the Pennsylvania Health Law Project (PHLP), a legal aid organization that represents clients across the Commonwealth, observed that clients with declining health often experience “fear or reluctance … to ask for additional services,” due to concern that doing so will limit their existing access to services. In a recent letter to Pennsylvania’s Medicaid agency, PHLP shared data showing multiple examples of people receiving at-home medical care whose service hours were cut when they sought additional care coverage. PHLP’s data also showed MCOs cut in-home personal assistance services that had been previously approved, absent any demonstrable improvement in patients’ health status. PHLP cited 43 patients covered by a single MCO whose personal assistance hours were cut by 25 percent or more over a five-month period, more than half of whom had assistance hours cut by at least 50 percent. One northeastern Pennsylvania resident had their care hours cut from 70 to 35 hours a week despite having had three heart attacks, while still recovering from a car accident. The patient had several other serious health conditions including chronic pain, an unhealed ankle fracture, arthritis in his back, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a hematoma on the brain, nerve damage, dizziness, vision impairment, borderline diabetes, memory loss, and depression.

At Temple University Hospital, where Medicaid is the payer for nearly half of its patients, medical staff raised concern about delays and denials when patients are seeking cancer diagnoses and treatment. Temple reported that MCOs initially deny about 40 percent of imaging tests for cancer patients, even though such measures are the standard of care. Roughly 80 percent of the initial denials by MCOs for imaging are overturned following first-level appeals involving nurses or second-level appeals involving physicians, strongly suggesting the tests should not have been denied in the first place. Temple also reported that more than 10 percent of chemotherapy treatments are initially denied by MCOs. According to the hospital, 85 percent of these denials are overturned following physician-to-physician consultations.

When patients are denied coverage of medically necessary services, they often face tight timelines to file actionable appeals. Assuming such appeals are filed in a timely manner, the process can be complicated and time-consuming, creating barriers that can make it difficult for Medicaid enrollees to seek recourse. In its national evaluation, OIG found that just one in nine MCO denials were appealed, even though 36 percent of those appeals were successful in the first round—indicating that the requested services were medically necessary and should not have been initially denied. Only two percent of the denials that were upheld in the first round of appeals were elevated to a second level of appeal, OIG reported. Moreover, OIG cited multiple examples of MCOs missing required timelines to make coverage decisions, and raised concern about MCOs failing to provide enrollees with proper information about their right to appeal. Such issues have the potential to further impede access to care for those most in need.

OIG warned that capitated payment models “can create an incentive for insurance companies to deny the authorization of services to increase profits,” and its work makes clear that the issues faced by Medicaid enrollees in Pennsylvania and across our Nation must be addressed. I appreciate CMS’s commitment to partner with states to strengthen the monitoring and oversight of MCOs. However, it is concerning that CMS did not provide concrete answers to OIG’s recommendations aimed at addressing issues identified in its report. As such, I request that you respond to the following questions no later than November 16, 2023:

  1. CMS uses robust oversight tools to evaluate Medicare Advantage coverage denials but does not require states to conduct similar oversight of MCOs, which have higher denial rates. Of the 37 states it reviewed, OIG found that 22 did not conduct regular appropriateness reviews of MCO denials, including 13 that did not conduct such reviews at all. An additional 15 states did not analyze MCO denial data. Based on these findings, OIG recommendations called on CMS to (a) require states to regularly review the appropriateness of a sample of MCO prior authorization denials; (b) require states to collect data on MCOs’ prior authorization decisions; and (c) require states to implement automatic external medical reviews of upheld MCO prior authorization denials. Please indicate whether CMS concurs with each of the recommendations, and the specific actions CMS plan to take to carry them out.

 
 

  1. In addition to lower rates of initial denials, OIG found that Medicare Advantage plans were more likely than MCOs to overturn denials at the first stage of the appeals process. OIG suggested that the difference may be due to Medicare Advantage plans having more robust appeals processes in place than MCOs, including the use of external medical reviews. What steps has CMS taken to ensure that MCOs provide more robust appeals processes to Medicaid enrollees, including, but not limited to, external medical reviews?

 
 

  1. An OIG audit released in December 2022 found that a Pennsylvania MCO sent denial letters that failed to inform recipients of their right to a state “fair hearing.” OIG determined the omission was due to the Pennsylvania Medicaid agency removing language that informed enrollees of this right from a notice template that MCOs are required to use. OIG also identified inaccurate appeals information in denial letters sent to enrollees by an MCO operating in Iowa. While the OIG’s audits indicated the issues in both states had been resolved in response to its recommendations, such omissions and misstatements mean that enrollees may not have information necessary to understand their rights and options within the appeals process. Has CMS taken steps to ensure that all Medicaid enrollees are receiving accurate and accessible information about their right to appeal denials?

 
 

  1. States have the authority to take corrective measures and levy fines when MCOs fail to follow requirements set out by the Social Security Act and associated regulations. CMS requires Medicaid programs to report plan-level, state-specific sanctions for MCOs in Managed Care Program Annual Reports (MCPAR), including all administrative penalties, and corrective action plans, it issued. Please provide data from July 1, 2021 onward that each state, territory, and the District of Columbia has reported to CMS in tab D3 of their respective MCPARs.

I appreciate your commitment to ensuring that the Medicaid program, a bedrock for tens of millions of American, remains strong and is subject to appropriate oversight. I look forward to working with you to further strengthen it to ensure patients receive the care they deserve. If you or your staff have questions, please contact Peter Gartrell, chief investigator, at 202-224-5364.

Sincerely,

Robert P. Casey, Jr.

Chairman

Special Committee on Aging

Posted on

Edgewater Systems to pay $1.25M in Medicaid claims settlement

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The counseling firm failed to get sign off from qualified providers on individualized care plans.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.insideindianabusiness.com/articles/edgewater-systems-to-pay-1-25m-in-medicaid-claims-settlement

Tuesday, October 3, 2023 12:30 PM EDT

By Carley Lanich

 
 

(Adobe Stock Photo)

HAMMOND, Ind. – A Gary-based health care provider is expected to pay the state $1.25 million to resolve claims the company fraudulently billed the Indiana Medicaid program for mental health services.

U.S. Attorney Clifford Johnson’s office announced in a press release that state and federal officials reached a settlement with Edgewater Systems for Balanced Living to resolve civil claims brought against the company.

The Indiana Medicaid program — which provides services to low-income, often uninsured Hoosiers — is funded jointly by the state and federal government.

Story Continues Below

Federal officials say Edgewater repeatedly billed Indiana Medicaid for mental health counseling sessions that failed to meet a requirement stating providers must draft an individualized care plan signed by a qualifying physician or health service provider before billing Medicaid.

Officials say the billing occurred between November 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. They also said they believed Edgewater should have been aware of the billing requirement due to past negative audits.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Wayne T. Ault handled the settlement negociation following an investigation initiated by the northern district court and conducted with assistance from the Indiana Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Posted on

Carr: Child Behavioral Health Counselor Convicted of Medicaid Fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: Mr. Lacey’s shenanigans were first noticed by Wellcare. MCO fraud referrals do happen.

 
 

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://law.georgia.gov/press-releases/2023-09-28/carr-child-behavioral-health-counselor-convicted-medicaid-fraud

ATLANTA, GA – Attorney General Chris Carr today announced that Antonio Lacey, 47, a behavioral health counselor in Locust Grove, has been convicted of repeatedly submitting false claims to the Georgia Medicaid program for which he obtained $45,212. A Henry County Superior Court Judge sentenced the defendant to five years, with six months to be served in prison and the remainder on probation.

“Mr. Lacey used his role as a children’s counselor to defraud our state’s Medicaid program,” said Carr. “He placed personal greed above his responsibilities as a provider, and in the process, he broke the trust of Georgia families in need of services. Now he will spend time behind bars for his illegal actions, and we will continue our efforts to protect taxpayer dollars no matter the amount.”

Antonio Lacey Guilty Plea

On Aug. 15, 2023, Lacey pleaded guilty to both counts of the indictment brought by the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division:

  • Medicaid Fraud in violation of O.C.G.A. § 49-4-146.1 (b)(1)
  • False Statements and Writings in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-20

Lacey paid restitution in the amount of $45,212 at the time of his plea.

Case Summary

Lacey was enrolled in Georgia Medicaid as a provider of behavioral health services for children who cannot afford care. In a routine audit of Lacey’s practice, Wellcare, a care management organization working under contract with Georgia Medicaid, reported the lack of documentation and parents’ denial of services to the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH). DCH referred the case to the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division for further investigation. Their findings resulted in a two-count indictment against Lacey for submitting claims for which no services had been provided.

This case was investigated by Medicaid Fraud Division Investigators Ulecia Daniel and Wilner Piquant, along with Investigative Auditor Phoenecia Hunt and Intel Analyst Zwella Boyd. The case was prosecuted by Senior Assistant Attorney General Henry Allen Hibbert.

About the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division

The Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Division receives 75 percent of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $4,718,240 for Federal fiscal year (FY) 2023. The remaining 25 percent, totaling $1,607,601 for FY 2024, is funded by the State of Georgia.

Posted on

FRAUD (WA)- West Richland WA couple accused of $700,000 in Medicaid fraud

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: A husband and wife couple stole a ton of cash. This story even includes a few good ole fashioned stake outs.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/local/crime/article279782849.html

Crime


By Cameron Probert

September 30, 2023 5:00 AM

Richland, WA

A West Richland couple allegedly led a criminal organization that bilked Medicaid for more than $700,000, according to a Washington state investigation.

Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera, 46, and Carlos P. Rivera, 44, allegedly spent three years creating phantom therapy appointments, billing the wrong amounts to insurance companies and charging for appointments that never happened, according to recently filed court documents.

They used the money to pay for their home and at least five luxury cars, including two Ferraris and a Lamborghini.

After a lengthy investigation, the Washington State Attorney General’s Office filed 17 counts against the couple in Benton County Superior Court.

They are accused of leading a criminal organization, five counts of theft, five counts of money laundering and submitting false statements to Medicaid.

Wilkinson-Rivera also faces one count of forgery.

They have both been summoned to court to enter pleas to the charges on Oct. 19.

The couple ran Tri-Cities Marital and Family Therapy from an office building on Stevens Drive in Richland, according to public records.

The investigation also includes a Kennewick location where they operated previously.

Wilkinson-Rivera led a team of counselors, and Rivera ran the business, including billing, according to court documents.

Wilkinson-Rivera has had a lengthy career providing mental health services that began in 2004, according to her profile on Psychology Today. She has served as a bilingual clinician, a vocational rehabilitation counselor, a daycare provider and a hospital case manager.

Department of Health records say she became a licensed mental health counselor in 2015, and, according to the state attorney general, the alleged theft started shortly after.

Fraudulent billing

The state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Division started investigating the couple after getting a tip from a former co-worker, said Special Agent Ses Maiava in an affidavit.

The tipster said Wilkinson-Rivera was double billing for services not rendered. That including billing an entire family for therapy, but only treating one person.

Investigators soon discovered the couple was submitting Medicaid billing claims that misrepresented what they were doing, and raked in $710,000 between January 2016 and June 2019.

That included billing for patients who missed, skipped or canceled appointments, using incorrect billing codes, and submitting claims for hour-long sessions that were, in reality, much shorter.

The alleged fraudulent billing also included people who were never treated by anyone at the Tri-Cities Marital and Family Therapy.

“Sometimes these billings would correspond with family member’s treatments, but other times there would be a claim that was paid without any reason for it to be billed,” Maiava wrote. “I refer to these claims as ‘Phantom Billings.'”

Billing more than 24 hours

After getting the tip, a fiscal expert went through the billing statements that Wilkinson-Rivera had sent in and allegedly found she would have been working for more than 24 hours in a day.

State investigators watched Wilkinson-Rivera go into the office during three separate three-day periods in October 2018, January 2019 and March 2019. Each time, she billed for dozens of hours that she wasn’t working at the building.

During the surveillance in January, agents counted 44 people enter the facility, while Medicaid billing records allegedly showed them treating 133.

The records also showed she allegedly billed a family of five who had a group therapy, as if each member was treated during a separate 60-minute session.

In another case during the January period, a family of five was billed for a therapy session they never attended. In another family, one child received therapy, but then the child’s two siblings were also billed for individual hour-long sessions.

Investigators also searched the therapy office, Wilkinson-Rivera and Rivera’s home and got email and cellphone records.

As they searched the records, they found a number of appointments which were allegedly billed for an hour, but they only spent a half-hour on the phone.

In addition, they allegedly discovered that there were online or phone therapy sessions that were billed as if they were in person. Emails between the couple showed them encouraging or directing employees to use phone sessions to increase billing.

They also found the insurance was billed for appointments that were canceled or missed.

“(Text) messages from Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera to Carlos Rivera show they wanted to make as much money as possible after Cloreese Wilkinson-Rivera complains about working 50 hours and making little money in 2016,” according to court documents.

Phantom sessions

The bulk of the alleged fraud, more than $466,000, were for “phantom sessions.”

One of the examples listed was for a family of five people who were billed $23,000 for sessions that allegedly didn’t happened. One of the parents said she didn’t take her children to appointments during work hours for weekly sessions in the summer.

“The calendar entries show 417 of these sessions were phantom sessions or sessions that did not occur,” according to the affidavit.

In addition to the false bills, the couple also applied for health benefits from Medicaid for each other and each of their children between 2016 and 2019.

Fancy cars and house

The couple is accused of funneling the fraudulent payments into making car and mortgage payments.

While their West Richland home is now valued at more than $1 million, according to the Benton County Assessor’s Office, they paid $270,000 when they bought it in 2014.

According to court documents, they spent $112,000 on mortgage payments and $137,000 in car payments.

Among the car payments, there were five luxury cars they were paying for, including a 2004 Lamborghini Gallardo, a 2001 Ferrari Modena and a 1996 Ferrari.

Each of the cars can sell for between $80,000 and more than $100,000, according to CarFax.

Posted on

MCO (FL) – CareSource and Spark Pediatrics Partner to Serve Florida Medicaid Enrollees

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: CareSource adds another partner to its dance card for the FL market. This time with a focus on children with a need for medical daycare.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20231003356924/en/CareSource-and-Spark-Pediatrics-Partner-to-Serve-Florida-Medicaid-Enrollees

Partnership unites two innovative, mission-driven healthcare companies as ImagineCare

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.–(BUSINESS WIRE)-CareSource, a nationally recognized managed care organization, and Spark Pediatrics, the leading provider of prescribed pediatric extended centers (PPEC or Medical Daycare) in both Florida and nationally, announced today the launch of ImagineCare — a partnership to serve Florida Medicaid enrollees as a Provider Service Network (PSN). ImagineCare is an innovative managed care organization focused on deploying a provider-driven, community-centric, value-based care model for enrollees with medical complexities.

ImagineCare intends to participate in the procurement to serve Floridians who are part of the Statewide Medicaid Managed Care program administered by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. At the heart of the partnership is the mission to address social determinants of health that will directly improve the lives of vulnerable Floridians, including strong alignment with Hope Florida’s Pathways to Prosperity program that connects people to organizations empowered to help with all SDoH needs, leading them on an individualized path to prosperity, economic self-sufficiency and hope.

ImagineCare brings together two mission driven organizations that have a steeped history in delivering best-in-class care for the underserved populations. CareSource is a nationally recognized managed care organization with more than 30 years of Medicaid managed care experience, a nonprofit mission, and an established reputation as a leader in quality and operational excellence. In addition, CareSource is committed to enrollee-centric care and value-based provider partnerships, and — through its subsidiary, The Columbus Organization – has a steeped Florida history of similarly providing community-based services to Floridians.

Together through ImagineCare, CareSource and Spark intend to elevate Florida’s healthcare delivery model through operational ease for providers and a more person- and family-centered approach that empowers all enrollees to improve their everyday activities and lives.

“ImagineCare will clearly further our mission to transform care delivery for the most vulnerable populations in Florida,” said Jeff Soffen, Chief Executive Officer of Spark Pediatrics. “CareSource’s operational excellence and its leadership in focusing on social determinants of health will bring much needed care and innovation for this underserved population. We envision a world where all people, regardless of their medical condition, have access to the care and support they need to thrive, and are excited to bring this partnership to life in service of that mission.”

Further bolstering ImagineCare healthcare delivery is the leadership of The Columbus Organization, a subsidiary of CareSource. Columbus participates in a Florida Medicaid Waiver program, Consumer Directed Care Plus, which provides the opportunity for individuals to improve the quality of their lives by being empowered to make choices about the supports and services that will meet their needs and help them reach their goals.

ImagineCare will combine Spark and Columbus’ capabilities and understanding of the Florida healthcare delivery system with CareSource’s operational proficiency, its history as a recognized healthcare innovator and its industry leadership in expanding access to quality care beyond the four walls of the doctor’s office.

“As a nonprofit organization, we focus first on the people and the communities we serve, not shareholders,” said Erhardt Preitauer, President & CEO of CareSource. “With ImagineCare, we have an opportunity to be an innovative, sustainable partner to the state that will make a lasting difference in the health and well-being of Floridians while driving better quality and outcomes.”

ImagineCare is committed to improving the health of Floridians by leveraging local physician experience to inform decision-making, aligning incentives, using data more effectively and reducing friction between the delivery and the financing of healthcare.

“With ImagineCare, we are investing directly in Florida, in our communities, and in our enrollees,” said Larry Smart, Chief Financial Officer at CareSource. “As a full-time Florida resident for more than 30 years working in our state’s managed care industry, I am thrilled to be a part of this exciting announcement.”

If you are a provider interested in learning more about ImagineCare, please email ProviderInfo@ImagineCareHealth.com.

About ImagineCare

ImagineCare is a joint venture between CareSource and Spark Pediatrics combining both organization’s mission-driven approaches for a lasting difference in the health of enrollees and communities in Florida. Supported by CareSource’s 30+ years of managed health plan experience and Spark Pediatric’s 12 years of Florida experience providing in-home healthcare services and clinic-based therapies, ImagineCare intends to offer Florida Medicaid managed care recipients comprehensive health coverage and provide access to high-quality providers while delivering compassion and care.

About Spark Pediatrics

Spark Pediatrics is the best-in-class provider of care for children with medical complexities. Spark is the country’s largest provider of Prescribed Pediatric Extended Care (“PPEC”) centers, also known as Medical Daycare, an innovative community-based care center that provides a team-based, quality-driven, and empathetic environment for children with medical complexities to receive critical skilled nursing while promoting interpersonal socialization. Each clinic is staffed with pediatric-specialized nurses and complex care therapists supporting Physical, Speech and Occupational Therapy, as well as Applied Behavioral Analysis. Spark Pediatrics currently operates as the largest PPEC operator in Florida and Texas and serves as a strategic partner to hospital systems, health plans, pediatricians, specialists, and community organizations to deliver the best outcomes for children with medical complexities and their families. Spark is backed by Altitude Capital and Town Hall Ventures, both of whom specialize in funding the next generation of innovation for underserved populations.

About CareSource

CareSource is a nonprofit, nationally recognized managed care organization with over 2.3 million enrollees. Since its founding in 1989, CareSource administers one of the largest Medicaid managed care plans in the U.S. The organization offers health insurance, including Medicaid, Health Insurance Marketplace and Medicare products. As a mission-driven organization, CareSource is transforming health care with innovative programs that address the social determinants of health, health equity, prevention and access to care.

CareSource Florida Co. was formed to offer programs and products in the state of Florida.

About The Columbus Organization

A subsidiary of CareSource, The Columbus Organization empowers individuals to realize their meaningful-life goals through nationally recognized care/support coordination, professional clinical staffing, and quality improvement services for the intellectual/developmental disability (I/DD) or behavioral needs community. The Company delivers an unmatched depth of expertise, breadth of resources, diversity of thinking, and dedication to finding the most appropriate, personalized solutions for its customers.

Posted on

PROVIDERS (Financing)- Oklahoma Receives CMS Approval and Advances Medicaid Transformation with SoonerSelect

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: OK tees up the next round of magic money to hospitals by flipping from “supplemental payments” to “directed payments.” Both of course are billed as crucial for “value-based care” (just like DSRIP is…). All 3 are of course just a funds transfer mechanism for hospitals.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://oklahoma.gov/ohca/about/newsroom/2023/october/oklahoma-receives-cms-approval-and-advances-medicaid-transformation-with-soonerselect.html

Oklahoma City, OK – The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has granted approval for Oklahoma’s 1915(b) waiver for delivery system reform and the proposal to increase supplemental payments to hospitals. These approvals mark a significant milestone in the transition from a fee-for-service system to the new comprehensive health delivery system, SoonerSelect.

“The swift approval of these milestones is a testament to the tireless efforts of the OHCA team and our CMS partners,” said Ellen Buettner, OHCA Chief Executive Officer. “This achievement brings us one step closer to our vision of a comprehensive health delivery system designed to improve the quality of care and services to enhance the health and lives of Oklahomans.”

1915(b) waivers provide states with the flexibility to modify their delivery systems by allowing CMS to waive certain federal regulatory requirements. This waiver is the initial phase of collaboration between OHCA and CMS in transitioning to the SoonerSelect program.

The hospital payment proposal outlines the transition from current supplemental payments to directed payments based on average commercial rates under SoonerSelect, which will substantially increase the pool of funds available for participating hospitals.

OHCA, in close coordination with the provider community, contracted entities and CMS, is diligently preparing for a seamless transition with rigorous testing of systems, provider network development and on-site readiness reviews. SoonerSelect will allow OHCA to strengthen the quality of services SoonerCare members receive by leveraging the resources of the contracted entities, investing in enhanced care coordination and addressing social determinants of health, while maintaining program and contractual oversight to ensure SoonerSelect goals are met.

All health and dental plans will be required to provide SoonerSelect members the same health care services currently offered by SoonerCare but may offer additional benefits.

SoonerSelect dental plans are expected to launch Feb. 1, 2024, with medical and children’s specialty plans expected to launch April 1, 2024.

For more information and updates about delivery reform in Oklahoma, visit https://oklahoma.gov/ohca/about/delivery-reform.html.

Posted on

MH/BH- Report Shows Discrepancies in MOUD Utilization Among Medicaid Enrollees

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: About 500,000 Medicaid members who needed meds to help with their substance use disorder did not get it.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/ap/news/report-shows-discrepancies-moud-utilization-among-medicaid-enrollees

About one-third of the 1.5 million Medicaid enrollees with opioid use disorder (OUD) in 2021 did not receive medication for opioid use disorder treatment (commonly known as MOUD), and certain demographic groups were even less likely to receive MOUD, according to a recent report from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General.

“Access to MOUD is crucial to reduce overdose mortality and improve the quality of life of people with opioid use disorder,” the report’s authors wrote. “Medicaid is uniquely positioned to achieve these goals given that the program is estimated to cover almost 40% of nonelderly adults with opioid use disorder.

“Although CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and states have taken several steps in recent years to increase MOUD access in Medicaid, our findings demonstrate that a significant number of enrollees with opioid use disorder may not be receiving this life-saving treatment.”

The findings were based on Medicaid and Medicare claims data to determine the extent to which Medicaid enrollees with OUD received MOUD in 2021. Medicaid enrollment and eligibility data were also examined to determine variances in treatment rates among demographic groups.

In 2021, about two-thirds of Medicaid enrollees with opioid use disorder received MOUD that year, either through Medicaid or, for some dually eligible enrollees, through Medicare. Buprenorphine was the most commonly administered medication (647,832 enrollees), followed by methadone (355,024), and naltrexone (69,001).

Meanwhile, more than 510,000 eligible enrollees with OUD did not receive MOUD through Medicaid or Medicare. Researchers noted that it is possible some of the enrollees in this group may have received medication treatment through self-pay or other sources or it was determined that MOUD was not an appropriate treatment for their circumstances. Still, the authors noted, their findings suggest that more effort is needed to improve access to treatment through Medicaid for all those who are eligible and in need of services.

Demographic Discrepancies

The OIG report showed that people of color and those with a disability and/or blindness were less likely to receive MOUD. Based on data from 15 states with reliable race/ethnicity data, just 53% of Black or African American enrollees with OUD received medication treatment. Other groups, including Asians, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders, and American Indians or Alaska Natives, also had lower-than-average utilization rates.

Meanwhile, 56% of enrollees with a disability and/or blindness received MOUD compared to 67% of those without.

Utilization rates also varied widely by state. For example, while just 37% of Medicaid enrollees with OUD in Illinois received MOUD, the rate was 89% for enrollees in Rhode Island. Ten states were found to have utilization rates below 50%.

Action Items

OIG concluded its report by recommending that CMS should help states—especially those with low rates of MOUD use— identify and reduce barriers to treatment by providing technical assistance, collaborative learning opportunities, webinars, toolkits, and other resources. Efforts should also be made to increase the number of states with valid and complete race and ethnicity data.

The authors also recommended that states and federal partners dedicate resources to educating Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) enrollees about access to MOUD, including in office-based settings.

 
 

Reference

Many Medicaid Enrollees with Opioid Use Disorder Were Treated with Medication; However, Disparities Present Concerns. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General; 2023.

Posted on

EXPANSION (NC) North Carolina Expands Medicaid

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: The Good Guvnr Cooper let the bill he signed months ago become law- including the poison pill branded as “NC Works.”

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/north-carolina-expands-medicaid-3612702/

 
 

On December 1, 2023, North Carolina will become the 40th state to implement Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), extending Medicaid eligibility to more than 600,000 adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL).

North Carolina’s path to Medicaid expansion has spanned more than a decade. Shortly after the 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius U.S. Supreme Court ruling made Medicaid expansion optional, North Carolina’s General Assembly passed Session Law (S.L.) 2013-5 prohibiting North Carolina from effectuating Medicaid expansion without the General Assembly’s approval. Governor Roy Cooper (D) has pursued expansion since he entered office in January 2017, but year after year, the proposal failed to receive sufficient support in the General Assembly.

Over the past two years, several shifts in the federal and State landscape helped reset the terms of the discussion. First, financing for expansion became even more favorable. The 2021 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided an eight quarter, five percentage point increase in the regular federal medical assistance percentage for states that newly adopted Medicaid expansion after March 11, 2021. This is in addition to the enhanced 90% federal matching rate for expansion populations provided in the ACA. For North Carolina, the enhanced funding under ARPA translated into an additional $1.8 billion. The State also developed a new strategy for financing the non-federal share of expansion through the State’s hospitals, avoiding the need for Medicaid expansion to compete with other items in the State’s general funds. North Carolina also has made substantial changes to transform the delivery of healthcare services under Medicaid, including transitioning from a predominantly fee-for-service Medicaid program to Medicaid managed care, a change mandated by the General Assembly. Finally, as evidence has continued to mount on the health and economic benefits of Medicaid expansion, polling has shown strong support for expansion among North Carolina voters. Ultimately, North Carolina Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R), once a staunch opponent of expansion, concluded, “Medicaid expansion if implemented in a reasonable, responsible manner is a positive for state fiscal and healthcare policy.”

On March 23, 2023, North Carolina’s General Assembly passed House Bill 76 authorizing Medicaid expansion (“NC Health Works”), which was signed into law by Governor Cooper as S.L. 2023-7 shortly thereafter. But still, there was a catch: the law made expansion contingent on the passage of the State’s budget.
After months of negotiations, on September 22, 2023, the General Assembly passed the State’s
2023-2025 biennium budget.
That same day, while voicing strong opposition to items in the budget unrelated to expansion, Governor Cooper announced his intention to allow the budget to become law without his signature to permit Medicaid expansion to take effect without further delay.

North Carolina’s expansion will be effective on December 1, 2023, giving the State an important new opportunity to retain coverage gains from the continuous coverage guarantee during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.1 North Carolina is currently processing more than 2.9 million redeterminations after a three-year pause. To date, North Carolina has renewed coverage for 79% of enrollees, the fourth highest rate of renewals among states—a figure that seems poised to grow with Medicaid expansion.

Graphic 1: North Carolina’s Timeline to Medicaid Expansion



Key Features of Legislation

In addition to authorizing expansion, S.L. 2023-7 establishes new Medicaid payments to hospitals, a workforce development program, certificate of need reforms, and funding to support Medicaid eligibility determinations, among other provisions. Concurrently, the budget allocates approximately $700 million of the $1.8 billion that the State expects to receive through the ARPA enhanced match to strengthen North Carolina’s mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) delivery system. Key provisions of both pieces of legislation are described below.

S.L. 2023-7 Enabling Medicaid Expansion

Financing Sources for NC Health Works. Under the ACA, the federal government covers 90% of the cost of coverage for expansion adults, and states are required to cover the remaining 10%, referred to as the non-federal share. Under S.L. 2023-7, expansion will not require any increase in State General Fund spending. The non-federal share of expansion costs will be financed in full using the following sources:

  • A new tax on acute care hospitals;
  • Increased intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) from public hospitals to the State; and
  • Premium taxes assessed on Medicaid managed care plans for expansion enrollees.

Sunset Clause for Expansion. The legislation includes a “sunset provision” that would terminate coverage for the expansion group if: (1) the federal share of expansion costs drops below 90%, or (2) if the 10% non-federal share cannot be fully financed through the sources described above.

Medicaid Work Requirements, Pending Indication of Federal Approval. S.L. 2023-7 requires that “if there is any indication” the federal government will resume authorizing work requirements as a condition of Medicaid eligibility, North Carolina’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) must apply and negotiate for federal approval to implement them. The Biden Administration has taken the position that conditioning Medicaid eligibility on work requirements does not further the objectives of the Medicaid program—a reversal from the Trump Administration.

Workforce Development Program. By December 1, 2024, North Carolina’s Department of Commerce must submit a plan to the legislature for a statewide workforce development program that coordinates workforce development efforts across State agencies, including DHHS. Among other requirements, S.L. 2023-7 requires DHHS to coordinate with the Department of Commerce to develop strategies to connect individuals newly enrolled in Medicaid and other social service programs to the workforce development program, including by linking them to a workforce development case manager. The Department of Commerce and DHHS are required to report to the legislature every five years on Medicaid enrollees’ participation in workforce development programs and relevant outcomes (e.g., wage increases, ineligibility for Medicaid due to employment).

Creation of Healthcare Access and Stabilization Program (HASP). DHHS is required to request federal approval to establish HASP, a state-directed payment program that would increase Medicaid reimbursement to acute care hospitals and critical access hospitals up to levels comparable to reimbursement from private health insurers. Under HASP, the State will make quarterly payments to Medicaid managed care plans covering the difference between Medicaid base rates and a payment level that more closely reflects commercial payment rates. Managed care plans will in turn distribute directed payments to hospitals in their networks. Payments will be financed entirely using funds collected through quarterly assessments on acute care hospitals, IGTs from public hospitals and federal funds. The legislation provides detailed methodology by which DHHS must calculate the hospital assessments and IGTs that will finance the HASP payments.

Certificate of Need Reforms. S.L. 2023-7 includes changes that exempt certain facilities and expenditures, such as licensed home care agencies providing Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment services, increases in chemical dependency treatment and psychiatric beds at existing facilities and purchases of replacement medical equipment, from requiring DHHS’ “certificate of need” review and approval process.

Support for Medicaid Eligibility Determinations. DHHS will provide $4 million in funding to County Departments of Social Services (County DSS) to support eligibility determinations for individuals newly eligible for Medicaid due to expansion. Additionally, S.L. 2023-7 temporarily permits, for up to 12 months, the Federally Facilitated Marketplace to conduct Medicaid eligibility determinations to further reduce administrative burden on County DSS.

New Initiatives Funded Under State Budget by ARPA Enhanced Match

The 2023-2025 fiscal biennium budget also allocates approximately $700 million in funding generated by the ARPA enhanced match to support the State’s mental health and SUD delivery system. These investments include rate increases to mental health and substance use providers, in addition to investments such as:

  • $99 million for community-based behavioral health programs for justice-involved populations.
  • $80 million to support community-based and other specialized treatment options for children and families with significant behavioral health and other complex needs.
  • $10 million for recruitment and retention of behavioral health providers working in outpatient primary care settings in rural, underserved areas of the State.
  • $40 million for sign-on and retention bonuses to members of the behavioral health workforce at state healthcare facilities including psychiatric hospitals, developmental centers, alcohol and drug treatment centers, neuro-medical treatment centers and residential programs for children.

Moving Forward

With expansion and the significant new investments in its healthcare and social service system financed by the ARPA enhanced federal matching funds, North Carolina is undertaking a once-in-a-generation effort to improve the health of its residents. North Carolina joins six other states in implementing Medicaid expansion since 2020: Utah, Idaho and Nebraska in 2020; Oklahoma and Missouri in 2021; and South Dakota thus far in 2023. While these other states have pursued Medicaid expansion through voter support on ballot initiatives, North Carolina’s expansion of Medicaid through the legislative process is notable for its bipartisan support. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that if the remaining ten states2 adopted Medicaid expansion, approximately 3.5 million individuals would newly gain coverage. For these states, the ARPA enhanced match remains available as an additional incentive to implement Medicaid expansion.

1 The 2020 Families First Coronavirus Response Act required states to main continuous coverage of nearly all enrollees as a condition of accessing enhanced federal Medicaid funding during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Over the past several months, states have resumed Medicaid redeterminations.

2 Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Posted on

RX- Renalytix surges 28% on Medicaid news

MM Curator summary

The article below has been highlighted and summarized by our research team. It is provided here for member convenience as part of our Curator service.

 
 

[MM Curator Summary]: CMS prices a lab test and the market moves.

 
 

 
 

Clipped from: https://www.proactiveinvestors.com.au/companies/news/1028482/renalytix-surges-28-medicaid-news-1028482.html

TechHardware & electrical equipment

Written by:

Ian Lyall


Published: 19:05 03 Oct 2023

 
 

Shares of Renalytix PLC (AIM:RENX) surged 28% in early trading after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a price of $950 for the company’s FDA-approved kidneyintelX.dkd test.

The test, which uses artificial intelligence (AI) to predict risks for people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, will be listed on the nationwide Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule starting 1 January, and the price will be locked in for at least three years.

Earlier this year, an American Medical Association (AMA) panel recommended that this advanced test get its own unique code to set it apart from the original KidneyIntelX test. This led to a national pricing review by CMS, confirming the $950 price tag.

Renalytix believes this pricing decision, backed by expert and public reviews, not only validates the value of their KidneyIntelX platform but also makes it easier to expand health insurance coverage for the test in the US. The company also sees this as a strong basis for pricing in international markets.

At 9.05 am, the shares were changing hands for 79.98p, up 17.48p on Monday’s close.

View Price & Profile

Add related topics to MyProactive

Tech
Hardware & electrical equipment
Renalytix PLC

NO INVESTMENT ADVICE

ProactiveInvestors is a publisher. You understand and agree that no content in this record or published on ProactiveInvestors’ website (the “Site”) constitutes a…

FOR OUR FULL DISCLAIMER CLICK HERE

Most read

Mining

Lithium stocks to watch amid market volatility and economic challenges


1 day, 9 hours ago

Finance

Sam Bankman-Fried: What charges does the former king of crypto face?


1 day, 1 hour ago

Industry & services

First Graphene validates “world leading” carbon reducing PureGRAPH in trial


12 hours, 4 minutes ago

Tech

US Treasury takes action against Chinese crypto wallets in fentanyl crackdown


8 hours, 32 minutes ago

Sign up to receive alerts and news direct to your inbox

Sign up for Newsletter