Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Dec 10th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.

In this issue…

Article 1:  Medicaid Access & Coverage to Care in 2017 (MHPA’s Institute for Medicaid Innovation, Oct 2018)

Clay’s summary:  The industry survey from this leading Medicaid health plan association doesn’t disappoint.
Key Excerpts from the Article:  … Key findings from the data were noted in the high-risk care coordination, value-based payment models, women’s health, and behavioral health sections. For instance, results from the survey demonstrate that the majority of Medicaid MCOs in 2017 performed a number of core functions in providing comprehensive, high-risk care coordination. The most commonly performed core functions included developing a plan of care for members, supporting adherence to the plan of care, engaging a care team of professionals to address the needs of the member, and conducting risk assessments….The findings also indicate that Medicaid MCOs are increasingly using value-based payment (VBP) models when providing care for their members. In 2017, half of Medicaid MCOs indicated that they were piloting population-specific VBP models, while over 15 percent were expanding successful pilots. Finally, approximately 10 percent of MCOs surveyed reported that they had extensive VBP arrangements in place in 2017. As barriers to VBP adoption are removed, we anticipate an increase in the number of Medicaid MCOs transitioning from the pilot phase to fully implemented arrangements….
 
 
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Article 2:  Who can be believed in medical research? Charles Barta, Nov 21 2018

Clay’s summary:  An AZ physician provides an overview of bogus medical and health systems theories throughout the years. Including that old chestnut about how expanding Medicaid would reduce ER in Oregon (that one’s a real knee-slapper!)
Key Excerpts from the Article:  … One interesting fact that has not been reported involves the idea that increasing Medicaid would clearly lower inappropriate emergency room visits and the expense these visits cost the public. We would save money…Oregon decided to prove this in 2009. It vastly increased the number of residents eligible for Medicaid. Unfortunately, the state didn’t have the funds to pay for this, so they put a lottery in place. Half the people eligible were given Medicaid while the other half became a “control group.” This was a scientifically perfect, randomized experiment. …The results? Two years later, the covered group had a 40 percent increase in unnecessary ER use. When a social experiment doesn’t work, the usual excuse of “we didn’t fund it enough — we need more money” wasn’t applicable. The next excuse, “The newly enrolled didn’t have time to get used to the system so they didn’t attempt to make (free) appointments with their doctors.” Two years later, a follow-up study was done. Surprise! The increase in unnecessary ER rose dramatically. The only news organization that reported this was NPR….
 
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Article 3:  Our opinion: State budget reforms are needed, Houma Today Editorial Board, Nov 19, 2018

Clay’s summary:  A small town newspaper comes out in favor of income verification and work requirements for Medicaid eligibility. They must be evil, GOP-loving, Trump worshiping [Insert current set of slurs media tells you to append to people with opinions non-leftist).
Key Excerpts from the Article:  … But some of these reforms make a lot of sense. For instance, income verification for Medicaid can limit paying out benefits to those who don’t qualify while making sure those who do qualify get the help they need….A recent state audit claimed that as much as $85 million could have been spent over the past several years on people who didn’t qualify for Medicaid. That’s because Health Department officials check income only once, at the time of the enrollee’s initial application for the program. They don’t check again until 12 months later, when the person applies for renewal of coverage. In the meantime, the person could have gotten a new job or increased income, becoming ineligible for Medicaid….
 
Read full article in packet or at links provided
Posted on

Menges Group 5 Slides Series for November 2018

The Menges Group puts out these great analyses and insights each month. And is kind enough to let us repost them for the MM audience. Check out themengesgroup.com to learn more about the work they do. 

Our November Edition of the 5 Slide Series focuses on the 2018 election results and conveys some of the potential implications of these results regarding Medicaid expansion.

Mid-Term Election Results and Medicaid Expansion Dynamics — November 2018

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Nov 19th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.

In this issue…

Article 1: COUNTERPOINT: Medicaid expansion is unfunded, unsustainable for state of Nebraska

Clay’s summary: Voters didn’t listen to this dude.
Key Excerpts from the Article:  …It is also likely that expansion costs will far exceed projections, just as costs have in nearly every state that has expanded. Iowa spent over $150 million more than expected. Kentucky’s Medicaid program is facing a $296 million budget shortfall due to unpredictable costs (yes, the program itself is that much in debt). Ohio’s Medicaid program costs the state an average of $437 million a month…
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Article 2: Maryland might not have properly vetted some Medicaid enrollees

Clay’s summary: Perhaps there was maybe some payments that could have been somewhat non-compliant with the law but who’s to say, really? It’s a gray area- move along.
Key Excerpts from the Article: Maryland may have allowed residents who did not qualify for Medicaid into the government health program for the poor by failing to consider all of their income, according to a routine audit of the quasi-governmental agency that oversees the Maryland health exchange.
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Article 3: Virginia facing high unexpected Medicaid costs

Clay’s summary: Well at least they decided to expand and spend even more (this is all costs not-related to recent expansion largess).
Key Excerpts from the Article:
State officials said Friday that Virginia has about $460 million in unforeseen Medicaid costs. …The new costs, first reported by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, are unrelated to Virginia’s recent decision to expand Medicaid eligibility to low-income adults under the Affordable Care Act. …Instead, Secretary of Finance Aubrey Layne said much of the new costs stem from faulty forecasts overestimating the benefits of having private health insurers cover a greater number of some of the state’s more costly Medicaid recipients. Another reason for the increase is a higher-than-expected enrollment of children in the state’s Medicaid program, he said…
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Nov 12th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.

 
In this issue…
Article 1:

MACPAC urges Azar to pause, re-evaluate Arkansas’ Medicaid work requirements, Eli Richman, FierceHealthcare, Nov 9, 2018

Clay’s summary:
MACPAC feels left out with all the attention on work requirements, needed to go on record as raising yellow flag.
Key Excerpts from the Article:
In a letter to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar, the independent commission that advises CMS on policy matters said it was “highly concerned” about the statistics and recommended the state pause the program until adjustments can be made… The disenrolled individuals in Arkansas were unable to report work and community engagement activities as required by the policy, but the commission argued that the state’s approach contributed to the challenges. However, MACPAC cited extremely low rates of successful reporting: A whopping 91.6% of the beneficiaries required to report compliance failed to do so in September 2018…. “The low level of reporting is a strong warning signal that the current process may not be structured in a way that provides individuals an opportunity to succeed, with high stakes for beneficiaries who fail,”
Read full article in packet or at links provided
 

Article 2:

Medicaid Expansion Opponent Picked to Lead Medicaid, Steven Porter, Health Leaders Media, Oct 16, 2018

 
Clay’s summary:
The current CMS/Trump administration has repeatedly expressed a clear belief that CMS can leverage Medicaid to alleviate poverty vis a vis work requirements being asked for by states. Lefties keep repeating the same rebuttals (and effectively calling Ms. Verma a liar when she refutes leftist claims that work requirements’ main goal is to reduce Medicaid rolls), and have not offered any other solutions to alleviate poverty. In the lefty mind, CMS really only pays for things and does not have any other function. In a shocking turn of events, the current CMS/Trump administration (duly elected by American voters, despite what tin-foil hat wearing loony left zombies think re RussiaHoax) has appointed someone who has a history of not floating the pay-for-everything Medicaid mainstream. If your head did not explode from this paragraph- quick, go knit another protest hat to deal with the trauma of someone disagreeing with you!
Key Excerpts from the Article:
Mary Mayhew’s rise-out-of-poverty rhetoric around Medicaid policymaking aligns with statements made by Trump administration officials. Mayhew oversaw a shrinking state Medicaid program and opposed Medicaid expansion… One critic, a Democrat, described her as “antagonistic toward Medicaid.” …A former hospital lobbyist who spent most of the past decade as Maine’s health commissioner under Gov. Paul LePage has been tapped to lead Medicaid on the federal level. …Mary Mayhew earned a reputation in Maine as someone who, alongside LePage, championed additional limits on the public benefit programs she oversaw, reducing enrollment in the state’s Medicaid program by 67,000 beneficiaries between 2011 and 2015 then opposing Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act….
Read full article in packet or at links provided

Article 3:

Wisconsin Wins Federal Approval for Medicaid Work Requirements, Steven Porter, Health Leaders Media, Oct 31, 2018

Clay’s summary:
But, but, but- muh lawsuit!!!
Key Excerpts from the Article:
 
The state is the fifth to secure approval for such a program, but a federal judge blocked Kentucky’s waiver last summer, so Wisconsin is the fourth with an active waiver.
The federal government formally approved Wisconsin’s plan Wednesday to impose work requirements on certain Medicaid recipients, signaling that the Trump administration is not backing down from the controversial policy position.
Read full article in packet or at links provided
Posted on

Menges Group 5 Slides Series for August, September, & October 2018

The Menges Group puts out these great analyses and insights each month. And is kind enough to let us repost them for the MM audience. Check out themengesgroup.com to learn more about the work they do. 

The August edition quantifies Medicaid DSH payments, showing the progression of DSH spending in each state from 2013-2017.  The key takeaway is that Medicaid DSH has not dropped at all across the expansion states since 2013, even though this was intended to occur as one of the mechanisms to help offset the Federal costs of Medicaid expansion.

The September edition presents Medicaid data from our Pharmacy Practice, quantifying the differences in cost per prescription between the MCO and FFS settings in two selected high-volume therapeutic classes.  In both drug classes (as occurs with Medicaid prescriptions overall), the MCO setting is achieving large percentage savings relative to FFS.  However, the path taken to achieve these savings is quite different between the two drug classes shown.

October’s edition conveys some of our tabulations working with the recently published NCQA Medicaid health plan quality ratings for Rating Year 2018-2019.  AmeriHealth Caritas and UnitedHealthcare are the two top-rated national chain organizations in terms of their average NCQA rating across the states they serve.  Among the 13 Medicaid MCOs with a rating of 4.5 or above, the plans achieving this excellent quality score on the largest Medicaid membership base are Health Partners Plans in Pennsylvania, Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island, and Priority Health in Michigan.

Medicaid DSH Spending Trends — August 2018

Medicaid MCO Rx Cost Savings at Therapeutic Class Level — September 2018

Medicaid MCO Quality Overview, NCQA Ratings for 2018-2019 — October 2018

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 29th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

Report Asks About Quality Assurance in Medicaid Managed Care for Children, AJMC, Allison Inserro, 2/27/2018

Clay’s summary: Studies like this are strong support for the national Medicaid Quality Rating System (still to be implemented under the Mega Reg as of the time of writing)

Key Passage from the Article

A new report questions what metrics policy makers are using to evaluate whether or not children enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) are receiving quality care, given the public investment these programs receive.

The report, from the nonpartisan Georgetown University Center for Children and Families (CCF), said that state Medicaid agencies and CMS do not use 1 common measurement for measuring quality of care.

Data and transparency about the quality of care for children are scant, the report said. There is no publicly accessible national database with information on how well individual MCOs are serving enrolled children.

For instance, there is no national database regarding the performance of individual MCOs with respect to Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services, which are a guaranteed benefit providing care to children with special needs.

  

Read it here 


Article 2:   

How HEDIS, CMS Star Ratings, CQMs Impact Healthcare Payers, HealthPayer Intelligence, Thomas Beaton, 12/21/2017

Clay’s summary: Good overview for those just beginning to learn about quality rating systems in the space.

Key Passage from the Article

Quality performance metrics such as HEDIS, CMS Star Ratings, and standardized core quality measures (CQMs) can give consumers an objective indication of healthcare payer quality.

Standardized quality measures aggregate how well a payer has performed based on the regularity of services performed, improvements in patient health, and consumer satisfaction.  

Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare payers can leverage quality metrics in order to position and market their health plans as ideal insurance options for beneficiaries.

HEDIS, CMS ratings, and CQMs measure similar healthcare services and consumer-facing operations, but some quality datasets are more specialized, including metrics such as consumer satisfaction rates or chronic disease screening activities.

  

Read it here 

 

 


 

Article 3:   

CMS Scorecard for Medicaid, CHIP Measures Draws Scrutiny From State Directors, AJMC, Allison Inserro

Clay’s summary: So what’s your alternative? That the available data doesn’t support a meaningful dashboard is sort of the point, class…

Key Passage from the Article

CMS Monday released a scorecard that reports quality metrics voluntarily reported by states for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as well as federally reported measures, but the association that represents state Medicaid directors expressed some concerns with the scorecard’s data and what sorts of conclusions may be drawn from them, given the huge variability of state programs, essentially giving it a score of “needs improvement.”

CMS said that it is the “first time” it is publishing state and federal administrative performance metrics; the first 3 areas to be included are state health system performance, state administrative accountability, and federal administrative accountability. Health metrics include things like well-child visits, mental health conditions, children’s preventive dental services, and other chronic health conditions.

  

Read it here 

 


 

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 22nd, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

AHCA Points to Gains in Quality as House Panel Weighs SNF Oversight, Patrick Connole, Provider Magazine, 9/5/2018

Clay’s summary: Big Nursing Home lobby cries Uncle; asks for less regulation, please.

Key Passage from the Article

Ahead of a congressional hearing to scrutinize federal oversight of skilled nursing care, the American Health Care Association (AHCA) on Sept. 5 urged lawmakers to recognize the steady and significant improvement in the quality of care for skilled nursing care center residents instead of considering more regulation of an “already overburdened sector.” 

The statement by Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of AHCA, came before a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing titled “Examining Federal Efforts to Ensure Quality of Care and Resident Safety in Nursing Homes.”

He said while the discussion agenda is focused on whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Office of Inspector General exercise enough oversight to ensure residents are free from abuse and receive proper care, such a debate is missing the point and continues a pattern of disrespecting the nursing care profession.

“At a time when Congress faces public criticism for its failure to work together and accomplish shared goals, this hearing seems like a misguided effort to find more ways to regulate an already overburdened sector,” Parkinson said. Long term care is one of the most regulated industries in the country, “yet we’ve shown some of the most dramatic improvement on both self-reported and government quality measures.”

  

Read it here 


Article 2:   

Quality Improvement Projects Save Children’s Hospitals Millions, Jacqueline LaPointe, RevCycle Intelligence, 6/21/2018

Clay’s summary: Better management of asthma in pediatric populations can pay off. So can avoiding medical errors.

Key Passage from the Article

With their drive to deliver high-value care in mind, Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Ohio and Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital in Connecticut embarked on quality improvements efforts to address specific issues within their organizations that were impacting patient outcomes and cost.

Their quality improvement projects paid off in more ways than one. Nationwide has reported significant improvements in asthma control, resulting in $5.2 million in savings, while Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital has seen patient safety and error reporting increase, catching $3 million in savings for the hospital.

  

Read it here 

 

 


 

Article 3:   

CMS Awards $5.5M to Develop Palliative Care Quality Measures, Kaitlyn Mattson, Home Health Care News, 9/30/2018

Clay’s summary: Efforts to bring palliative care into value-based care are in the early stages.

Key Passage from the Article

The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), in partnership with the National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care and the RAND Corporation, has been awarded a three-year $5.5 million grant from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop patient-reported quality measures for community-based palliative care.

Filling the gaps in quality measurement of palliative care is one of the main sticking points for the three-year grant, according to AAHPM.

One of the many reasons to develop measures is because major gaps were observed in quality measurement for people with serious illness, according to a 2015 report measuring quality indictors for hospice and palliative carefrom AAHPM and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association.

  

Read it here 

 


 

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 15th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

Insurers Are Using AI to Boost Risk Management, Jared Kaltwasser, Healthcare Analytics News, 10/2/2018

Clay’s summary: Pretty blatant press-release dressed up as “news,” but interesting read nonetheless.

Key Passage from the Article

“The growth of value-based care is driving the need for deeper healthcare insights, for key activities such as risk adjustment, quality reporting, care and utilization management,” Apixio CEO Darren Schulte, M.D., told Healthcare Analytics News™.

The company’s pitch looks something like this: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is increasing audits of health plans offering Medicaid Advantage (MA), to ensure correct payments. That means health plans have to keep careful tabs on coding and payments. But unless the health plan owns the clinic, providers don’t share the same financial risks as insurers.

Apixio says about 85-95 percent of MA risk-adjustment payments are based on diagnosis codes from clinics and hospitals. The remaining payments are from chart coding. Diagnosis codes are backed up by patient notes and physician codes, but those records aren’t often reviewed prior to payment by the health plans. Thus, any errors may go undiscovered, which could cause regulatory headaches for health plans — but usually not clinics.

  

Read it here 


Article 2:   

Enhanced Patient Matching Is Critical to Achieving Full Promise of Digital Health Records, Pew Trusts, 10/2/2018

Clay’s summary: Care management only works if you are treating the right patient.. kind of makes me think about how they write “not this one” on the leg that is not to be cut off going into surgery..

Key Passage from the Article

This report focuses on the last problem—patient matching—while also recognizing that many other challenges remain for effective and robust interoperability.

Patient matching helps address interoperability by determining whether records—both those held within a single facility and those in different health care organizations—correctly refer to a specific individual. Unfortunately, patient matching rates vary widely, with health care facilities failing to link records for the same patient as often as half the time. Deficiencies in matching patients to their records can lead to safety problems: For example, if an allergy listed in one record is not documented in another, or if records for two different individuals are incorrectly merged, patient harm can occur. In a 2012 survey conducted by the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME), 1 in 5 hospital chief information officers indicated that patients had been harmed in the previous year due to mismatches.

Failures to effectively match patients can also be costly, leading to repeat tests and delays in care. In an extreme example, the care for an 11-month-old twin was documented in her sister’s record, resulting in the failure of the health system to recoup $43,000 in costs from the insurer.

  …

Read it here 

 


 

Article 3:   

Patient-Centered Medical Home Evidence Increases With Time, Paul Cotton, Health Affairs, 9/10/2018

Clay’s summary: Still losing money in year 7 of your health home? Don’t give up just yet- Health Affairs says they work, so they must work!

Key Passage from the Article

There are clear differences between studies that do and do not find benefits. Positive evaluations assess PCMHs on advanced standards, after up to five years of transformation and with financial incentives to improve quality and efficiency, or—like the HIV study above, the impact with high-cost, high-needs patients. Studies showing little benefit assessed practices with no financial incentives to reward improvement. They also looked at PCMHs using our initial 2008 standards that we updated in 2011, 2014, and 2017. The 2011 updates further emphasize pediatrics, health information technology, and clinician-patient collaboration. We made 2014 updates to emphasize more behavioral health care integration, team-based care, focus on high-need populations care management, and patient and family involvement. We made 2017 updates to streamline our recognition process and better support practices. And we will continue making updates in the future as we continuously listen to stakeholder feedback on how to improve this powerful program. 

PCMHs do, in fact, work. That is why the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which rewards clinicians for value instead of volume, gives PCMHs automatic credit. That is why 27 public-sector initiatives across 23 states and many private insurers use the NCQA PCMH model. That is why key medical boards provide PCMH credit for Maintenance of Certification. And that is why approximately 20 percent of all primary care physicians in the US are in the NCQA-recognized PCMH practices.

  

Read it here 

 


 

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 8th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

National Quality Forum identifies set of quality measures for rural providers, Paige Minemyer, FierceHealthcare, 9/18/2018

Clay’s summary: The specific needs of Rural Americans- finally a focus of pop health?

Key Passage from the Article

The set includes nine measures intended for a hospital setting—such as scores on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (HCAHPS) survey and Cesarean section rates—and 11 for ambulatory care settings, such as medication reconciliation postdischarge and preventive screenings for diabetes, behavioral health issues and tobacco use.

  

Read it here 


Article 2:   

Health Care Quality: It’s Motherhood and Apple Pie. Until You Start To Measure It. Lola Butcher, Managed Care, 9/3/2018

Clay’s summary: You mean the government can’t write a reg to improve quality of care? And actually focuses on minutia that can be counted versus outcomes that matter? Egads! #Resist!

Key Passage from the Article

When he’s using microsurgical techniques to treat unbearable facial pain, neurosurgeon Richard Zimmerman, MD, values precision above all. But as the chair of quality outcomes at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, he has come to accept that the government’s system for measuring health care quality is less than precise.

“If you’re a hematologist–oncologist, the survival rate of cancer patients might be a better indication of quality than how often you document that you have screened for depression,” he says.

But screening a patient for depression—or, more accurately, documenting that you have screened for depression, regardless of whether you actually remembered to do so—leads to higher pay from the Medicare program. Nobody’s paying more for high cancer-survival rates.

Welcome to health care’s pay-for-value movement, in which public and private payers want to reward—and penalize—physicians based on the quality of care they provide.

It’s a good idea with a big problem: Physicians don’t believe in it.

  

Read it here 

 

 


 

Article 3:   

CMS: Better Data Analytics, Quality Measures will Modernize Medicaid

Clay’s summary: Looking forward to seeing the creativity of haters in coming up with a way this is a bad thing.

Key Passage from the Article

Modernizing the Medicaid program environment will require investments in data analytics and a greater reliance on meaningful quality measures, says CMS Administrator Seema Verma in a new blog post. As spending on healthcare in general – and Medicaid in particular – continues to rise, providers and regulators will need to continue to create more effective partnerships around raising quality and cutting costs, Verma stated. “As program costs have continued to rise, we have failed to deliver a level of transparency and accountability for achieving positive outcomes commiserate with our significant investment,” she wrote. “But this is finally beginning to change. Over the last several years, CMS has collaborated with states to improve how we collect and use data to modernize and measure the Medicaid and CHIP program.”

  

Read it here