Category: Medicaid News and Analysis
Menges Group 5 Slides Series for November 2018
The Menges Group puts out these great analyses and insights each month. And is kind enough to let us repost them for the MM audience. Check out themengesgroup.com to learn more about the work they do.
Our November Edition of the 5 Slide Series focuses on the 2018 election results and conveys some of the potential implications of these results regarding Medicaid expansion.
Mid-Term Election Results and Medicaid Expansion Dynamics — November 2018
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Nov 19th, 2018
Article 1: COUNTERPOINT: Medicaid expansion is unfunded, unsustainable for state of Nebraska
Article 2: Maryland might not have properly vetted some Medicaid enrollees
Article 3: Virginia facing high unexpected Medicaid costs
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Nov 12th, 2018
MACPAC urges Azar to pause, re-evaluate Arkansas’ Medicaid work requirements, Eli Richman, FierceHealthcare, Nov 9, 2018
Medicaid Expansion Opponent Picked to Lead Medicaid, Steven Porter, Health Leaders Media, Oct 16, 2018
Wisconsin Wins Federal Approval for Medicaid Work Requirements, Steven Porter, Health Leaders Media, Oct 31, 2018
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: Nov 5th, 2018 (Midterms Edition)
Let’s just go nuts reading about all the places Medicaid expansion is on the ballot while we wait for the results to come in tonight. We will get back to our normal 3 article summary for the MMMRs next week..
If you haven’t — Vote!
Menges Group 5 Slides Series for August, September, & October 2018
The Menges Group puts out these great analyses and insights each month. And is kind enough to let us repost them for the MM audience. Check out themengesgroup.com to learn more about the work they do.
The August edition quantifies Medicaid DSH payments, showing the progression of DSH spending in each state from 2013-2017. The key takeaway is that Medicaid DSH has not dropped at all across the expansion states since 2013, even though this was intended to occur as one of the mechanisms to help offset the Federal costs of Medicaid expansion.
The September edition presents Medicaid data from our Pharmacy Practice, quantifying the differences in cost per prescription between the MCO and FFS settings in two selected high-volume therapeutic classes. In both drug classes (as occurs with Medicaid prescriptions overall), the MCO setting is achieving large percentage savings relative to FFS. However, the path taken to achieve these savings is quite different between the two drug classes shown.
October’s edition conveys some of our tabulations working with the recently published NCQA Medicaid health plan quality ratings for Rating Year 2018-2019. AmeriHealth Caritas and UnitedHealthcare are the two top-rated national chain organizations in terms of their average NCQA rating across the states they serve. Among the 13 Medicaid MCOs with a rating of 4.5 or above, the plans achieving this excellent quality score on the largest Medicaid membership base are Health Partners Plans in Pennsylvania, Neighborhood Health Plan of Rhode Island, and Priority Health in Michigan.
Medicaid DSH Spending Trends — August 2018
Medicaid MCO Rx Cost Savings at Therapeutic Class Level — September 2018
Medicaid MCO Quality Overview, NCQA Ratings for 2018-2019 — October 2018
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 29th, 2018
Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.
Article 1:
Report Asks About Quality Assurance in Medicaid Managed Care for Children, AJMC, Allison Inserro, 2/27/2018
Clay’s summary: Studies like this are strong support for the national Medicaid Quality Rating System (still to be implemented under the Mega Reg as of the time of writing)
Key Passage from the Article
A new report questions what metrics policy makers are using to evaluate whether or not children enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) are receiving quality care, given the public investment these programs receive.
The report, from the nonpartisan Georgetown University Center for Children and Families (CCF), said that state Medicaid agencies and CMS do not use 1 common measurement for measuring quality of care.
Data and transparency about the quality of care for children are scant, the report said. There is no publicly accessible national database with information on how well individual MCOs are serving enrolled children.
For instance, there is no national database regarding the performance of individual MCOs with respect to Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) services, which are a guaranteed benefit providing care to children with special needs.
…
Article 2:
How HEDIS, CMS Star Ratings, CQMs Impact Healthcare Payers, HealthPayer Intelligence, Thomas Beaton, 12/21/2017
Clay’s summary: Good overview for those just beginning to learn about quality rating systems in the space.
Key Passage from the Article
Quality performance metrics such as HEDIS, CMS Star Ratings, and standardized core quality measures (CQMs) can give consumers an objective indication of healthcare payer quality.
Standardized quality measures aggregate how well a payer has performed based on the regularity of services performed, improvements in patient health, and consumer satisfaction.
Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare payers can leverage quality metrics in order to position and market their health plans as ideal insurance options for beneficiaries.
HEDIS, CMS ratings, and CQMs measure similar healthcare services and consumer-facing operations, but some quality datasets are more specialized, including metrics such as consumer satisfaction rates or chronic disease screening activities.
…
Article 3:
CMS Scorecard for Medicaid, CHIP Measures Draws Scrutiny From State Directors, AJMC, Allison Inserro
Clay’s summary: So what’s your alternative? That the available data doesn’t support a meaningful dashboard is sort of the point, class…
Key Passage from the Article
CMS Monday released a scorecard that reports quality metrics voluntarily reported by states for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as well as federally reported measures, but the association that represents state Medicaid directors expressed some concerns with the scorecard’s data and what sorts of conclusions may be drawn from them, given the huge variability of state programs, essentially giving it a score of “needs improvement.”
CMS said that it is the “first time” it is publishing state and federal administrative performance metrics; the first 3 areas to be included are state health system performance, state administrative accountability, and federal administrative accountability. Health metrics include things like well-child visits, mental health conditions, children’s preventive dental services, and other chronic health conditions.
…
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 22nd, 2018
Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.
Article 1:
AHCA Points to Gains in Quality as House Panel Weighs SNF Oversight, Patrick Connole, Provider Magazine, 9/5/2018
Clay’s summary: Big Nursing Home lobby cries Uncle; asks for less regulation, please.
Key Passage from the Article
Ahead of a congressional hearing to scrutinize federal oversight of skilled nursing care, the American Health Care Association (AHCA) on Sept. 5 urged lawmakers to recognize the steady and significant improvement in the quality of care for skilled nursing care center residents instead of considering more regulation of an “already overburdened sector.”
The statement by Mark Parkinson, president and chief executive officer of AHCA, came before a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing titled “Examining Federal Efforts to Ensure Quality of Care and Resident Safety in Nursing Homes.”
He said while the discussion agenda is focused on whether the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and Office of Inspector General exercise enough oversight to ensure residents are free from abuse and receive proper care, such a debate is missing the point and continues a pattern of disrespecting the nursing care profession.
“At a time when Congress faces public criticism for its failure to work together and accomplish shared goals, this hearing seems like a misguided effort to find more ways to regulate an already overburdened sector,” Parkinson said. Long term care is one of the most regulated industries in the country, “yet we’ve shown some of the most dramatic improvement on both self-reported and government quality measures.”
…
Article 2:
Quality Improvement Projects Save Children’s Hospitals Millions, Jacqueline LaPointe, RevCycle Intelligence, 6/21/2018
Clay’s summary: Better management of asthma in pediatric populations can pay off. So can avoiding medical errors.
Key Passage from the Article
With their drive to deliver high-value care in mind, Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Ohio and Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital in Connecticut embarked on quality improvements efforts to address specific issues within their organizations that were impacting patient outcomes and cost.
Their quality improvement projects paid off in more ways than one. Nationwide has reported significant improvements in asthma control, resulting in $5.2 million in savings, while Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital has seen patient safety and error reporting increase, catching $3 million in savings for the hospital.
…
Article 3:
CMS Awards $5.5M to Develop Palliative Care Quality Measures, Kaitlyn Mattson, Home Health Care News, 9/30/2018
Clay’s summary: Efforts to bring palliative care into value-based care are in the early stages.
Key Passage from the Article
The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), in partnership with the National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care and the RAND Corporation, has been awarded a three-year $5.5 million grant from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop patient-reported quality measures for community-based palliative care.
Filling the gaps in quality measurement of palliative care is one of the main sticking points for the three-year grant, according to AAHPM.
One of the many reasons to develop measures is because major gaps were observed in quality measurement for people with serious illness, according to a 2015 report measuring quality indictors for hospice and palliative carefrom AAHPM and the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association.
…
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 15th, 2018
Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.
Article 1:
Insurers Are Using AI to Boost Risk Management, Jared Kaltwasser, Healthcare Analytics News, 10/2/2018
Clay’s summary: Pretty blatant press-release dressed up as “news,” but interesting read nonetheless.
Key Passage from the Article
“The growth of value-based care is driving the need for deeper healthcare insights, for key activities such as risk adjustment, quality reporting, care and utilization management,” Apixio CEO Darren Schulte, M.D., told Healthcare Analytics News™.
The company’s pitch looks something like this: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is increasing audits of health plans offering Medicaid Advantage (MA), to ensure correct payments. That means health plans have to keep careful tabs on coding and payments. But unless the health plan owns the clinic, providers don’t share the same financial risks as insurers.
Apixio says about 85-95 percent of MA risk-adjustment payments are based on diagnosis codes from clinics and hospitals. The remaining payments are from chart coding. Diagnosis codes are backed up by patient notes and physician codes, but those records aren’t often reviewed prior to payment by the health plans. Thus, any errors may go undiscovered, which could cause regulatory headaches for health plans — but usually not clinics.
…
Article 2:
Enhanced Patient Matching Is Critical to Achieving Full Promise of Digital Health Records, Pew Trusts, 10/2/2018
Clay’s summary: Care management only works if you are treating the right patient.. kind of makes me think about how they write “not this one” on the leg that is not to be cut off going into surgery..
Key Passage from the Article
This report focuses on the last problem—patient matching—while also recognizing that many other challenges remain for effective and robust interoperability.
Patient matching helps address interoperability by determining whether records—both those held within a single facility and those in different health care organizations—correctly refer to a specific individual. Unfortunately, patient matching rates vary widely, with health care facilities failing to link records for the same patient as often as half the time. Deficiencies in matching patients to their records can lead to safety problems: For example, if an allergy listed in one record is not documented in another, or if records for two different individuals are incorrectly merged, patient harm can occur. In a 2012 survey conducted by the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME), 1 in 5 hospital chief information officers indicated that patients had been harmed in the previous year due to mismatches.
Failures to effectively match patients can also be costly, leading to repeat tests and delays in care. In an extreme example, the care for an 11-month-old twin was documented in her sister’s record, resulting in the failure of the health system to recoup $43,000 in costs from the insurer.
…
Article 3:
Patient-Centered Medical Home Evidence Increases With Time, Paul Cotton, Health Affairs, 9/10/2018
Clay’s summary: Still losing money in year 7 of your health home? Don’t give up just yet- Health Affairs says they work, so they must work!
Key Passage from the Article
There are clear differences between studies that do and do not find benefits. Positive evaluations assess PCMHs on advanced standards, after up to five years of transformation and with financial incentives to improve quality and efficiency, or—like the HIV study above, the impact with high-cost, high-needs patients. Studies showing little benefit assessed practices with no financial incentives to reward improvement. They also looked at PCMHs using our initial 2008 standards that we updated in 2011, 2014, and 2017. The 2011 updates further emphasize pediatrics, health information technology, and clinician-patient collaboration. We made 2014 updates to emphasize more behavioral health care integration, team-based care, focus on high-need populations care management, and patient and family involvement. We made 2017 updates to streamline our recognition process and better support practices. And we will continue making updates in the future as we continuously listen to stakeholder feedback on how to improve this powerful program.
PCMHs do, in fact, work. That is why the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), which rewards clinicians for value instead of volume, gives PCMHs automatic credit. That is why 27 public-sector initiatives across 23 states and many private insurers use the NCQA PCMH model. That is why key medical boards provide PCMH credit for Maintenance of Certification. And that is why approximately 20 percent of all primary care physicians in the US are in the NCQA-recognized PCMH practices.
…
Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: October 8th, 2018
Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal.
Article 1:
National Quality Forum identifies set of quality measures for rural providers, Paige Minemyer, FierceHealthcare, 9/18/2018
Clay’s summary: The specific needs of Rural Americans- finally a focus of pop health?
Key Passage from the Article
The set includes nine measures intended for a hospital setting—such as scores on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (HCAHPS) survey and Cesarean section rates—and 11 for ambulatory care settings, such as medication reconciliation postdischarge and preventive screenings for diabetes, behavioral health issues and tobacco use.
…
Article 2:
Health Care Quality: It’s Motherhood and Apple Pie. Until You Start To Measure It. Lola Butcher, Managed Care, 9/3/2018
Clay’s summary: You mean the government can’t write a reg to improve quality of care? And actually focuses on minutia that can be counted versus outcomes that matter? Egads! #Resist!
Key Passage from the Article
When he’s using microsurgical techniques to treat unbearable facial pain, neurosurgeon Richard Zimmerman, MD, values precision above all. But as the chair of quality outcomes at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, he has come to accept that the government’s system for measuring health care quality is less than precise.
“If you’re a hematologist–oncologist, the survival rate of cancer patients might be a better indication of quality than how often you document that you have screened for depression,” he says.
But screening a patient for depression—or, more accurately, documenting that you have screened for depression, regardless of whether you actually remembered to do so—leads to higher pay from the Medicare program. Nobody’s paying more for high cancer-survival rates.
Welcome to health care’s pay-for-value movement, in which public and private payers want to reward—and penalize—physicians based on the quality of care they provide.
It’s a good idea with a big problem: Physicians don’t believe in it.
…
Article 3:
CMS: Better Data Analytics, Quality Measures will Modernize Medicaid
Clay’s summary: Looking forward to seeing the creativity of haters in coming up with a way this is a bad thing.
Key Passage from the Article
Modernizing the Medicaid program environment will require investments in data analytics and a greater reliance on meaningful quality measures, says CMS Administrator Seema Verma in a new blog post. As spending on healthcare in general – and Medicaid in particular – continues to rise, providers and regulators will need to continue to create more effective partnerships around raising quality and cutting costs, Verma stated. “As program costs have continued to rise, we have failed to deliver a level of transparency and accountability for achieving positive outcomes commiserate with our significant investment,” she wrote. “But this is finally beginning to change. Over the last several years, CMS has collaborated with states to improve how we collect and use data to modernize and measure the Medicaid and CHIP program.”
…