Posted on

New “Data Element Library” from CMS

As part of its bigger push for EHR integration, CMS is releasing information it gathers from nursing homes and rehabilitation hospitals. the Data Element Library (DEL) does not include patient data, but instead includes the data dictionary for various assessments CMS requires (fields, response options). The idea is that companies doing tech design can build in future integration with CMS data sets in this space.

 

From the DEL announcement on cms.gov:

 

What is the Data Element Library?

The CMS Data Element Library (DEL) is the centralized resource for CMS assessment instrument data elements (e.g. questions and responses) and their associated health information technology (IT) standards.

DEL Mission and Goals

The mission of the Data Element Library (DEL) is to create a comprehensive, electronic, distributable, and centralized resource of CMS assessment instrument content.

In support of the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act (IMPACT Act), the goals of the DEL are to:

Serve as a centralized resource for CMS assessment data elements (questions and response options)
Promote the sharing of electronic CMS assessment data sets and health information technology standards; and
Influence and support industry efforts to promote Electronic Health Record (EHR) and other health IT interoperability
In support of CMS’ focus on “Patients over Paperwork”, the DEL promotes interoperable health information exchange by linking CMS assessment questions and response options to nationally accepted health IT standards. Standardized and interoperable data support health information exchange across healthcare settings to facilitate care coordination, improved health outcomes, and reduced provider burden through the reuse of appropriate healthcare data.

What is included in the DEL?

CMS assessment items included in the DEL are derived from the following:

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI)
Long-Term Care Hospital Continuity Assessment Record & Evaluation (CARE) Data Set (LCDS)
Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Minimum Data Set (MDS)
Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS)
Hospice Item Set (HIS)
Functional Assessment Standardized Items (FASI) (In Progress)
The DEL does not contain patient health data. The DEL database includes post-acute care (PAC) assessment questions and their response options, as well as other associated details including the assessment version, item labels, item status, copyright information, CMS item usage, skip pattern information, lookback periods, and linked health IT Standards (e.g. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC), and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms (SNOMED) when available).

 

Posted on

Medicaid Tech as Tool to Fight Opioid Crisis- New CMS Incentives

CMS sent a new State Medicaid Director letter (read it here) in early June to help agencies understand options to use federal funding to fight opioid addiction with tech. There is particular emphasis on using the dollars to integrate the systems docs use to identify doctor-shopping for pills (Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs, or PDMPs) into other EHR-systems. The idea is to reduce the steps a doctor has to take to check for abuse if they suspect the patient is an addict and attempting to get opioids illegally.

 

Here’s a good writeup at Health Data Management

Here’s another good writeup, with more discussion of CMS’s goal of using telehealth to address Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) over at mHealth

Posted on

Wondering when a state might put out a modular tech RFP?

I get asked this question by clients all the time. Best starting point is the current MMIS contract report put out by CMS. It will show you the expected procurement schedules by CMS Region and state. Generally speaking, whenever the larger MMIS is up for bid will be the best time to expect a state to test out a modular procurement. Screenshot below, full file attached.

 

 

mmisscsr

 

Posted on

Medicaid Who’s Who Interview: Roger Gunter

Roger is the Chief Executive Officer for Virginia Medicaid at Aetna. Check out his LinkedIn profile here. 

1. Which segment of the industry are you currently involved?

A:  Medicaid Managed Care-In Virginia we manage TANF, CHIP, Foster Care, ABD, Dual Eligible, Waivered, and now Expansion

2. How many years have you been in the Medicaid industry?

A: I have been in the Medicaid industry since 1994, 24 years

3. What is your focus/passion? (Industry related or not)

A:My focus and passion for work is to eliminate roadblocks for those that I work with and those that we have the honor to serve. We want to be customer obsessed in order to create an experience that changes our members’ lives forever. Our vision is to focus on life transitions, providing solutions for each stage in our member’s life journey, by providing services in the community where a member lives. For non-work related passions; they are my wife and children.

4. What is the top item on your “bucket list?”

A: Coach my future grandkids football team

5. What do you enjoy doing most with your personal time?

A: Sitting on the beach watching for the green flash, listening for the sizzle at sunset, grilling tuna with my family. I enjoy playing golf.

6. Who is your favorite historical figure and why?

A: Jesus Christ, because He died for the sins of mankind

7. What is your favorite junk food?

A: Pizza

8. Of what accomplishment are you most proud?

A: Being the husband of a wife I don’t deserve, the father of 3 wonderful boys, and with Aetna here in Virginia achieving exponential growth to $862 million from $180 million by winning two RFPs across the entire commonwealth, which increased span of control by 560%. Increased FTEs to 433

9. For what one thing do you wish you could get a mulligan?

A:  I wish I would have been known more about managing playing football and studying pre-med while at the University of Colorado

10. What are the top 1-3 issues that you think will be important in Medicaid during the next 6 months?

A:

  1. To start to figure out how to truly integrate Physical and Behavioral health care
  2. Figure out how to implement expansion waiver services in an efficient manner
  3. Manage all the necessary resources to handle all the implementations and responses
Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: July 2nd, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

CMS to increase oversight of Medicaid enrollment, managed-care plans, Virgil Dickson, Modern Healthcare, June 26, 2018

Clay’s summary: Care’ and Caid’ blew $89B on improper payments in the last reporting year. I refuse to get my hopes up that anyone actually cares at this point.

Key Passage from the Article

  

The agency announced Tuesday that it is boosting audits to confirm that Medicaid beneficiaries are correctly identified as expansion or pre-expansion enrollees. States receive higher federal match rates of around 90% for expansion enrollees, while the match rate can be as low as 50% for pre-expansion enrollees.

“This imbalance in the federal matching rate creates financial risks for taxpayers by incentivizing states to shift cost to the federal government,” CMS Administrator Seema Verma told reporters Tuesday. “This requires us to make sure that states are making accurate eligibility determinations.”

The CMS also said it will audit states found by HHS’ Office of Inspector General to be at high risk for enrolling ineligible people in Medicaid. California, Kentucky and New York have been cited by the OIG for doing this in the past.

 

Read it here 


Article 2:   

Rx: Zucchini, brown rice, turkey soup. Medicaid plan offers food as medicine

Clay’s summary: I know I feel better when I eat healthier. Some Philly MCOs are doing SDOH via good food. Cool.

Key Passage from the Article

 Since 2015, Health Partners has joined a small group of insurers around the country to offer some members specially designed meals to improve their health. The company paid the full cost for 560,000 meals to be delivered to more than 2,100 of its members with various conditions such as diabetes, heart disease and kidney failure.

The Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition Alliance (MANNA), a Philadelphia-based nonprofit organization that provides medically appropriate food for people with serious illnesses, prepares and delivers the meals.

The service covers three meals a day and typically lasts six weeks, although members can renew for two additional six-week cycles. It also provides nutritional counseling. MANNA provides the meals to everyone in the household to help family members support patients who need to change bad diets. Health Partners, which serves Philadelphia and nearby counties, said its investment is paying off.

With the kick-start that comes from receiving these free meals and continued counseling to shop better and prepare healthy meals, the members are better able to control their diabetes, use the hospital less and reduce their medical costs, according to the health plan.

Read it here

 

 


 

Article 3:   

CMS should intensify Medicaid eligibility checks at certain facilities, government asserts, Elizabeth Newman, McKnight’s Long Term Care News, June 28, 2018

Clay’s summary:  Related to the first one, but with info and link-outs on ramping up Medicaid provider background checks.

Key Passage from the Article

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should prioritize fingerprint-based criminal background checks and conduct site visits to high-risk providers to mitigate Medicaid fraud, a government watchdog official said Wednesday.

CMS has agreed with the HHS Office of Inspector General recommendations but has extended the deadline for implementing the background checks, Brian P. Ritchie, Assistant Inspector General for Audit Services, testified Wednesday before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. CMS announced a series of Medicaid fraud initiatives Tuesday in advance of Ritchie’s testimony.

Read it here

 


 

Posted on

Clay’s Weekly Medicaid RoundUp: Week of June 25th 2018

Soundtrack for today’s RoundUp pessimist readers-

http://bit.ly/2MySpFq

For optimist readers- http://bit.ly/2MwKtEt

SIMPLIFY THE MATH, UP THE SAVINGS- Pretty entertaining to watch the debate over “savings” of the new Medicaid managed care ramp up in Iowa (I say new, its been a year or 2 now, just seems new since the media keeps tarring and feathering it anew each day). The numbers have been a roller coaster, hitting a high of $232M last year, then dropping to $47M. Now the “savings” is back up to $141M. The New New Medicaid Math is simpler and better, mainly because it shows more savings. Here’s an idea – how about fee for service sucks in terms of quality of care and that’s a good enouch reason to have managed care in Medicaid? Is that good enough to let Iowa move into the 21st century healthcare system for Medicaid members? Let me know when we start scrutinizing savings estimates of more popular “innovations” like social determinants waivers or health lifestyle / member engagement programs. Ready to have your savings math beaten up every day for 2 years on those?

 

CMS SAYS NAH (READ THAT IN YOUR BEST APPROXIMATION OF BOSTON ACCENT) TO MA- Short backstory, Massachusetts wanted to opt out of the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program because it forces them to pay for whatever drugs are approved on the federal formulary (I’m simplifying). Early analysis suggests MA was hoping to have their cake and eat it, too. They wanted to exclude some drugs in their program, but also keep getting the rebate goodness on other drugs via MDRP. CMS said that is not workable. Sort of the basic way the MDRP functions, folks. Maybe MA will revise the request to opt out of MDRP altogether? Or follow OK, which recently got its plan approved to modify its Medicaid rx program (by adding more rebate deals tied to outcomes of the drugs)?

 

CMS READY TO START CHECKING RATE CELLS- CMS will be doing some verifying of who goes in what rate cell. For non-MCO readers, think of rate-cells as buckets that members get put into. The MCO gets paid different amounts based on the bucket. If Clay is in the 20-25 year old healthy male bucket, the MCO might get $200pmpm. If instead he is in the TANF-SNAP-SSI-DISABLED-ELDERLY bucket, the rate cell would pay out much higher (maybe around $1,200 pmpm depending on the market). From a state perspective, you want to get as many people as possible in the ObamaCare Magic Money bucket / rate cell – because that’s the one feds pay almost all the costs for (going rate of 90% as we come down from the high of ACA expansion coercive fmaps). CMS will now be doing more audits to confirm that enrollees are correctly placed in the pre- or post-expansion rate cells. The agency also announced audits of states like CA that OIG found to be incorrectly enrolling people in Medicaid.

 

HOLY SMOKES BATMAN! UPDATE THE WORK REQUIREMENTS MAP TO SHOW MICHIGAN- I think this is the state that the legislators passed a law that would stop salaries for the Governor’s HHS staff if he didn’t submit a waiver request to CMS for work requirements. Looks like the strong-arm tactics worked (I have never seen anything like this in all my 87 years of doing Medicaid). The bill passed includes terminating the expansion program (people who did not have Medicaid before 2014 or so) if CMS does not allow the state to charge a 5% premium to able-bodied, non-elderly bennies at 100-133% federal poverty level. The gloves are off.

 

CONGRATS TO THE KANSAS MCO CONTRACT WINNERS- Aetna, United and Centene (Sunflower State Health Plan) all won renewals in KS this week. Amerigroup got the boot. Winners – Congrats!

 

FARRIS’S FANTASTIC FRAUD FOLLIES– And now for everybody’s favorite paragraph. Let’s start the ticker and see who wins this week’s award.  Susan Britt of Norwich, CT was arrested this week on charges of getting paid $91k for services not provided (she’s a mental health counselor). Felicia Blount and Charlotte Hunter of Gary, IN were charged with stealing $100k using inflated mileage reports in their medical transportation business. Collins Anyanwu-Mueller of Westchester, NY was sentenced on Monday for stealing $392k from Medicaid using false claims for private-duty nursing care. He got caught when investigators found claims for the same time he was in Europe and for other times when the members were in a hospital or being cared for by another nurse. Frank Patino of Livonia, MI got nabbed for stealing 112M Medicaid bucks using an illegal opioid prescribing scheme. There is something in this story about Patino giving away free hams, but I can’t verify it. Please, please, please write in if you know anything about the hams. Patricia Lancaster of Wheeling, WV was convicted on false claims charges this week. She stole $181k from Medicaid by submitting false claims for “adult companion services” (seems like personal care services, based on what I am seeing). Problem is (in addition to the bogus claims) that she lived with the patient – which made her ineligible for the payments. She knew this, which is why she tried to hide it from the agency. Mr Patino – the $112M and intrigue of the hams put you over the top this week. You win! Taxpayer you lost (about $113M to be exact, just on the ones I found this week).

 

That’s it for this week. As always, please send me a note with your thoughts to clay@mostlymedicaid.com or give me a buzz at 919.727.9231. Get outside (batten the hatches! Summer storms are here) and keep running the race (you know who you are).

FULL, FREE newsletter@ mostlymedicaid.com . News that didn’t make it and sources for those that did: twitter @mostlymedicaid . Trystero: Etseg delkhiig avrakhyn tuld Khüügee ilgeev

 

Consulting Services | Free Webinars | Training

Posted on

Medicaid Who’s Who Interview: Pam Tyranski

1. Which segment of the industry are you currently involved?

A:  Medicaid and Medicare: clinical and quality program development (including value based purchasing components); drafting MCO bids; supporting program implementations; readiness reviews and accreditation evidence preparation; program assessment and re-structure

2. How many years have you been in the Medicaid industry?

A: Do I have to answer that? I started as a youngin’….since January 1988, so that makes it 30 years. I’ve been in healthcare 35 years

3. What is your focus/passion? (Industry related or not)

A: Building provider/MCO collaboration models Non-Industry: travel

4. What is the top item on your “bucket list?”

A: Visiting the town from which my grandparents immigrated

5. What do you enjoy doing most with your personal time?

A: Spending time with my husband, friends and family at the beach-year round it is beautiful.

6. Who is your favorite historical figure and why?

A: I’m a Court of Henry the 8th junkie- Catherine of Aragon is probably my favorite in that cast of characters. Some may argue she made a few ill-advised moves and trusted people she shouldn’t have, but I view that as being human. And from all I have read about her, she exhibited strength, grace, honor, faithfulness, dignity and kindness until her death. I find the plotting, intrigue, exploitation, maneuvering fascinating in Henry the 8th’s court. As a clinician, reading about the remedies they used (in that era and) to treat the King’s maladies and his own concoctions is also interesting to me.

7. What is your favorite junk food?

A: Water Ice (pronounced- “wooter ice”, yes I’m from Philly)

8. Of what accomplishment are you most proud?

A: Two things professionally: My appointment to the Delaware Board of Nursing, on which I’ve been serving by appointment of the Governors since 2011 and leading a Medicaid MCO start-up that went live in 45 days, passed readiness review, and EQRO.

9. For what one thing do you wish you could get a mulligan?

A: I can’t think of one thing I’d like to do over professionally that I wish I could re-wind for another swing at it. I view every experience as a brick in the wall -they all have their place, and upon each I’ve tried to build on what I learned, the successes I had and more importantly the mistakes I’ve made.

10. What are the top 1-3 issues that you think will be important in Medicaid during the next 6 months?

A: 1) The copayment/cost share and buy-in models in the works or proposed in several states-that will be challenging to providers, and intuitively, I worry that members won’t access care soon enough if they have to pay when they are used to not having any out-of-pocket (initially it may save $, but in the long run, I’m skeptical). 2) The work requirements on the table in a few states-how will that impact the rolls? 3) And my biggie is the national push toward value based purchasing models. For many reasons- a) global payments in various permutations have come and gone in the decades I’ve been in managed care- what is going to make them succeed now, and are we going to invest in those resources? b) in the markets I’ve been supporting, there are very few providers equipped to meet the requirements to support the more sophisticated VBP models, and who is going to fund the resources to prepare them for those models? c) I worry that it is too ambitious, and unrealistic to set goals of converting all/vast majority of providers to VBP contracts in the next few years. Will it push the smaller providers who often are the only ones in underserved areas out of the Medicaid programs because they can’t participate or compete? Will that create access issues?

Posted on

Monday Morning Medicaid Must Reads: June 25th, 2018

Helping you consider differing viewpoints. Before it’s illegal. 

 

Article 1:  

‘Medicaid-for-All’ Rapidly Gains Interest in the States, Mattie Quinn, Governing, June 4, 2018

Clay’s summary:  You silly gooses. Geese.

Key Passage from the Article

  

Six states — Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey and Washington state — have active legislation to establish a Medicaid buy-in program. In four others, bills were proposed but stalled. New Mexico has set up a task force to study a Medicaid buy-in program, and Connecticut may do the same.

According to experts, each state likely has a different reason for considering this option.

“States are still exploring what it would even mean,” says Heather Howard, director of State Health and Value Strategies. “For one state, it could be about addressing a bare county. For another, it could be an affordability issue. For another, it could be about expanding competition. In the absence of federal legislation on health care, states are asking: ‘What tools do we have?'”

For left-leaning lawmakers, Medicaid buy-in is considered a step toward single-payer health insurance. But conservatives are wary of expanding the government’s role in health care and of funneling more money into Medicaid, which is already a huge slice of state budgets.

New Mexico state Sen. Jerry Ortiz y Pino — who co-sponsored a bill to study the issue — says Medicaid buy-in makes sense there because the majority of residents (54 percent) already have Medicaid or Medicare. It’s the only state where more than half the population uses government health care.

“Besides Medicaid, we have a high Medicare population, high VA [Veterans Affairs] population and high numbers in the Indian Health Service,” says Ortiz y Pino. “So when we talk about non-governmental insurance, it’s a small number. That small population means it’s hard to attract private insurers, particularly in the marketplace.”

New Mexico’s marketplace has four insurers covering the state, which is actually more than many part of the country. About half of Americans only had one or two insurers last open enrollment season. Still, like most other states, New Mexico’s marketplace is facing increased premiums and possible insurer dropouts this year.

 

Read it here 


Article 2:   

Fiscal Survey of the States, National Association of State Budget Officers, Spring 2018

Clay’s summary: Very important annual report that covers lots of insights from state budgets. Medicaid is always a big part of the analysis- starts on page 73 of this years report.

Key Passage from the Article

 In fiscal 2017, states reported total spending for Medicaid expansion of $87.7B, $6.7B in state funds, and $81.1B in federal funds. In fiscal 2018, states are estimated to spend $91.2B in all funds, $10.3B in state funds, and $80.9B in federal funds. 

Read it here

 

 


 

Article 3:   

Lawmakers focus on flaws in Texas Medicaid program after Dallas Morning News investigation

Clay’s summary:  Things are heating up for MCOs in the LoneStar state after a reporter decided to look into Medicaid managed care.

Key Passage from the Article

   

Part of the investigation focused on twins D’ashon and D’asia Morris, who were born with severe birth defects and were placed in foster care after they tested positive for drugs at birth. While D’ashon Morris was a foster child under Superior HealthPlan — a managed care program for foster children — he was denied 24-hour nursing care that would prevent suffocation, according to The Dallas Morning News’ report.

The report said providing that care would have cost Superior Health as much as $500 a day. One day, when D’ashon was in temporary foster care while his foster mother, Linda Badawo, was traveling outside the country, he started choking. After nurses and medics performed CPR for 40 minutes, D’ashon was taken to the hospital, where doctors concluded that he had gone too long without oxygen to his brain — he would be brain dead for the rest of his life.

“Superior is 100 percent responsible,” Badawo, who has since adopted D’ashon, told lawmakers Wednesday, her voice shaking. “I strongly believe that they don’t have any passion for what they do.”

It wasn’t until after the accident that Superior gave D’ashon 24-hour care, the Morning News reported. 

“So my question to you was: ‘Was this a matter of life and death?'” state Rep. Mark Keough, R-The Woodlands, asked Superior’s representatives regarding 24-hour care for D’ashon. 

David Harmon, Superior’s chief medical director, said his company did not believe so, based on the information it had. “If we did, we would not have authorized to continue” with 17 hours a day of care instead of 24, he said.

The story, Harmon said, “misrepresented the facts in all of these cases to make us look very bad.”

David McSwane, one of the Morning News reporters who wrote the investigative series, defended the reporting.

“The data, docs and patients in the stories tell the story,” McSwane tweeted during the hearing.

Mark Sanders, CEO of Superior HealthPlan, said Superior proposed using a “soft splint” to prevent D’ashon from pulling out a tube that helps him breathe. Badawo said she was horrified because state regulations bar her from using physical restraint on foster children in many situations. 

Sanders, who showed an example of the soft splint to lawmakers, said the device was “in no way shape or form” like a restraint.

State Rep. Richard Peña Raymond, D-Laredo, told representatives from Superior that the company needed to become more aware that there were going to be members and patients who would need more attention than others. 

“We’re going to stay on you,” Raymond warned. “We don’t want these things to happen. But if we don’t do it right, these things will bubble up.” 

Representatives of private companies that manage Medicaid in Texas slammed the newspaper report for what they said were inaccuracies. LeAnn Behrens, west region president of AmeriGroup Medicaid, took issue with the report’s assertion that AmeriGroup is withholding care from patients in order to make a profit. 

“As you all know, the state of Texas has set up a system that restricts the amount of profits that a managed care can make,” Behrens said. “Members get the best care, they get the right care at the right place — and you have confidence that I am being wise with taxpayer money.”

 

 

Read it here

 


 

Posted on

Clay’s Weekly Medicaid RoundUp: Week of June 18th 2018

Soundtrack for today’s RoundUp pessimist readers- http://bit.ly/2Ib98vV

For optimist readers- http://bit.ly/2Mdn62N

 WELL YOU SAID IF THE LEGISLATURE FUNDED IT… If you’ve been following LePage vs Expansioners, you know that the Good Guvn’r of Maine has sworn to not submit an expansion request to the federalis unless the legislature came up with the money to pay for it (seems logical, but I know desire/emotion trumps logic in our world…). On Wednesday a judge upheld LaPage’s right to not be forced to submit an expansion plan against his will. Then (also on Wednesday) the ME Senate and House approved $60M to expand the state’s program. Your move, Mr. Governor.

 NEW REPEAL / REPLACE EFFORT VIA APPROPRIATIONS? The House GOP budget teed-up on Tuesday includes $1.5T in cuts to Medicaid and “other healthcare programs.” There may also be hooks in the bill to allow for repealing ObamaCare without the Dem votes normally needed (I think this is the “reconciliation” maneuvering but not sure yet). GOP leaders are sounding the alarm over mounting debt and related fiscal crises if we don’t reduce spending. Where are my Medicaid #Resistance Fighters? Shouldn’t you be freaking out / yelling right now? By the way, the new legislation is called “A Brighter American Future.”

 

MEDICAID FRAUD UP 157% SINCE 2013 AND SENATE LEADERS SHOW CONCERN- A new report from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee shows Medicaid fraud skyrocketing since 2013 (and it was already ridiculously high). The report claims $36B is lost to Medicaid fraud each year. Some members are laying the blame at CMS’s feet for not “taking basic steps to fight Medicaid fraud.” It doesn’t help CMS’s case that GAO has been sounding the alarm for years. Of the 11 anti-fraud recommendations GAO has made in the last 3 years, guess how many CMS has implemented. Zero. I have been tracking and trying to bring emphasis on the disgrace that is Medicaid fraud for 15 years now.. Not getting my hopes up this report will change much.

 

DEMOCRATS OPPOSE FUNDING NEW OPIOID TREATMENTS VIA MEDICAID- The House passed a bill on Wednesday to cover new treatments for opioid addiction in Medicaid programs. The legislation will allow for funding for addiction treatment to go to facilities with more than 16 beds (this

gets at the IMD exclusion for those familiar with this part of the space). States have been asking – and receiving- waivers to allow exactly this funding. But proponents say the waiver process is taking too long and this law would speed up access to treatment. Opposing dems said it didn’t go far enough.

HOW MUCH DID YOU PAY IN STATE TAXES LAST YEAR? 17% OF THAT WAS FOR MEDICAID – Up from 13% in 2000, according to a new Pew study. All 50 states spent a higher percentage of their funds on Medicaid in 2016 compared to 2000. LA had the highest surge, going from 11% in 2000 to 24% in 2016 (they also expanded Medicaid in 2016).

 

PA AMBULANCES GET 33% MEDICAID PAY RAISE- Standard rates for Advanced Life Support went from $200/trip to $300 in the Keystone State. The Ambulance Lobby (usually its one dude in the state with most of the marketshare) is a real thing. I have seen it in multiple markets over the years.

 

MAJOR CHANGES FOR MDRP? MACPAC (the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission) is recommending 2 changes: 1) stop letting pharma set Avg Manufacturer Price using brand and generics, and instead use the prices actually available to wholesalers. This matters because rebates set off of generic prices are lower (and using the generics in the calculation dilutes the amount states can get back). And #2) MACPAC wants HHS to be able to punish manufacturers that don’t provide good enough data to monitor compliance.

MOLINA GETS FLORIDA LOSS OVERTURNED- The MCO had lost its business in 2 regions as part of the recent procurement cycle. After a successful protest, Molina will now continue to serve members in 2 of the 11 FL regions. The new decision is important for Molina – at $550M / year in revenue, the 5-year contract now secures $55M in profits (assuming a 2% profit rate).

FARRIS’S FANTASTIC FRAUD FOLLIES– And now for everybody’s favorite paragraph. Let’s start the ticker and see who wins this week’s award – er, not so fast. Not enough space this week. Get your fraud fix in the twitter feed (I put 20 or so fraud news items in there this week).

That’s it for this week. As always, please send me a note with your thoughts to clay@mostlymedicaid.com or give me a buzz at 919.727.9231. Get outside (pick tomatoes!) and keep running the race (you know who you are).

FULL, FREE newsletter@ mostlymedicaid.com . News that didn’t make it and sources for those that did: twitter @mostlymedicaid . Trystero: Pityānē putrālā jagācyā tāraṇāsāṭhī pāṭhavilē

 Consulting Services | Free Webinars | Training 

Posted on

Fight crime by treating substance abuse

The article below originally appeared in the Baltimore Sun. Reprinted with kind permission from the author Dr. Dan Morhaim (whom I had the good fortune of working with years ago in Maryland – Clay F)


 

– Dan K. Morhaim

On March 27, in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, I asked Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott Shellenberger what percentage of crime in Baltimore County was due to drugs. His answer: “Upwards of 85 percent.” I then asked Baltimore City Police Major Byron Conaway the same question, and his answer was “90 percent.”

As an E.R. doctor, I ask my patients who are substance abusers where they get the $50 a day needed to sustain their habit. Many get others hooked because then those new users become paying customers. There’s also petty crime, prostitution and the major crimes that plague our streets and neighborhoods.

If we are to be serious about reducing crime, then the focus must be on preventing and treating substance abuse. New multi-faceted policies are needed, both in the criminal justice system and in health care.

There is no point in saddling people arrested with small amounts of drugs with a misdemeanor conviction. Instead, users should be provided treatment instead of a criminal record that will haunt them for the rest of their lives. (The small number of people convicted of repeat violent crime felonies, however — especially with firearms — need to be vigorously prosecuted and incarcerated for extended periods.)

Substance abuse treatment ought to be immediately available, 24/7/365, and one of the best places to initiate this is in hospital emergency rooms. Persons with substance abuse disorders already show up in E.R.s for a wide variety of health issues, so why not routinely include drug treatment as part of the care? Treatment plans should be individualized, just as is done for all other medical conditions. Some patients may need long term care, others medicated assistance treatment (e.g. methadone, buprenorphine) and others faith-based approach. One size does not fit all.

Supervised consumption facilities also have been shown to work, reducing deaths, addiction, discarded needles and crime. It may seem to some that this idea condones substance abuse, but the data showing success cannot be denied. It is shortsighted to dismiss this option without seriously considering it first.

Among other efforts we should make: find ways to dispose of all medications safely, especially opioids; make naloxone more available to at least avoid some overdose deaths; allow people go to fire or police stations when they need help without fear of penalty; use methods other than narcotics to treat pain unless absolutely necessary; continue public education regarding substance use, especially in schools.

How can we afford to do this? The real question is how can we afford not to? There are about 30,000 daily drug users in the Baltimore metro area. At an average cost of $50 per day to sustain a habit, that means that $1.5 million per day — or $547 million per year — is spent solely to buy drugs. Statewide, Marylanders spend about $800 million per year on illegal drugs. Then there all the other costs in health care; the criminal justice system; and harm to families, victims, businesses and neighborhoods.

Where does all that money go? Ultimately, it goes to dangerous and violent overseas drug cartels and terrorist organizations, like ISIS and al-Qaida. We’ve been on a policy trajectory that is destroying our society from the inside while shipping vast sums of money to those who would destroy us from the outside.

The economics of the drug war now define the economic activity of many communities. Re-directing “drug money” to legitimate businesses and education would bring jobs, income and safety.

Imagine if only 10 percent or 20 percent of daily users got into treatment today, an achievable goal. Overnight the health care and criminal justice system would be decompressed because those now in treatment would tomorrow not be seeking money for drugs.

Of course, there’s a deeper question that must be confronted: Why do so many of us turn to drugs? Perhaps our focus on material wealth, our endless distractions via media, the daily stress most people endure, hurtful behaviors spanning generations and the emphasis on the individual over community leave too many of us feeling isolated, angry and unfulfilled. As author Johann Hari observed: “The opposite of addiction isn’t just sobriety; it is connection.”
But we’ve got to start somewhere.

Dan K. Morhaim is a physician and Democrat representing Baltimore County in the Maryland House of Delegates. His email is dan.morhaim@house.state.md.us.

Copyright © 2018, The Baltimore Sun, a Baltimore Sun Media Group publication | Place an Ad
MeasureMeasure